Midterm Results Following Minimally Invasive Distal Chevron Osteotomy: Comparison With the Minimally Invasive Reverdin-Isham Osteotomy by Means of Meta-analysis

To date, multiple different surgical techniques have been established for hallux valgus surgery, with each technique having its unique advantages and limitations. The open distal chevron osteotomy is widely accepted, but increasing patient demands have led several minimally invasive (MIS) techniques...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:In vivo (Athens) 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.2187-2196
Main Authors: Kaufmann, Gerhard, Weiskopf, Daniel, Liebensteiner, Michael, Ulmer, Hanno, Braito, Matthias, Endstrasser, Franz, Wagner, Moritz, Ban, Michael, Dammerer, Dietmar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cohort Studies
Hallux Valgus - diagnostic imaging
Hallux Valgus - surgery
Humans
Osteotomy
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To date, multiple different surgical techniques have been established for hallux valgus surgery, with each technique having its unique advantages and limitations. The open distal chevron osteotomy is widely accepted, but increasing patient demands have led several minimally invasive (MIS) techniques to be described in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after minimally invasive (MIS) distal chevron osteotomy and the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method. We assessed clinical and radiographic outcomes after MIS chevron osteotomy in 57 feet of 49 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 58.9 (range=39.0-85.4) months. Outcomes after MIS Reverdin-Isham osteotomy were analyzed by means of a systematic literature review with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Radiographic outcomes were significantly better in the MIS chevron cohort for intermetatarsal angle (p
ISSN:0258-851X
1791-7549
1791-7549
DOI:10.21873/INVIVO.12490