Loading…

Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study

Objective To determine the association of overnight extubation (OE) with extubation success. Study design Retrospective cohort study in three NICUs from 2016 to 2020. Infants without congenital anomalies, less than 1500 grams at birth, who were ventilated and received an extubation attempt were incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of perinatology 2021-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2532-2536
Main Authors: Guy, Brittany, Dye, Mary Eva, Richards, Laura, Guthrie, Scott O., Hatch, L. Dupree
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3
container_end_page 2536
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2532
container_title Journal of perinatology
container_volume 41
creator Guy, Brittany
Dye, Mary Eva
Richards, Laura
Guthrie, Scott O.
Hatch, L. Dupree
description Objective To determine the association of overnight extubation (OE) with extubation success. Study design Retrospective cohort study in three NICUs from 2016 to 2020. Infants without congenital anomalies, less than 1500 grams at birth, who were ventilated and received an extubation attempt were included. Primary exposure was OE (7:00 pm–6:59 am) and outcome was extubation success defined as no mechanical ventilation for at least 7 days after extubation. Results A total of 76/379 (20%) infants received OE. Infants extubated during the daytime were older and had higher illness severity markers. Extubation success rates did not differ for overnight (57/76, 75%) versus daytime extubations (231/303, 76%) after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). Conclusion Though infants in our cohort undergoing daytime and OE were dissimilar, extubation success rates did not differ. Larger multicenter studies are needed to test our findings and identify markers of extubation readiness in preterm infants.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41372-021-01168-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8308074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A680241112</galeid><sourcerecordid>A680241112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EosvCH-BkCQlxSfFn4uWAtKr4kipx6d1ynMnGVWIX22m7_x6HVJRFCPkw8szzjmfGg9BrSs4p4ep9EpQ3rCKMVoTSWlX1E7ShoqkrKQV_ijakEbxSXNRn6EVK14QsweY5OuOCE8EE36Bpn1KwzmQXPA49zm6CxXbmiI3vMNznuV2jabYWUsLO41uIRzyGO9y6mIc7cIchF39vfE4fsMHTPGZnwWeI2IYhxIxTnrvjS_SsN2OCVw92i64-f7q6-Fpdfv_y7WJ_WVkpdrmiO8OlVLIVnFFVbkxI4JJK0YFgSpgeOitIR7q6pn2jSiuqJTtOoVNgLd-ij2vam7mdCloKiWbUN9FNJh51ME6fRrwb9CHcasWJWoa2Re8eEsTwY4aU9eSShXE0HsKcNJNSlnp2DS3om7_Q6zBHX7orlKI1lY0Qj9TBjKDLpEJ51y5J9b5WhAlKKSvU-T-ocjqYnA0eelf8J4K3fwgGMGMeUhjn5b_SKchW0MaQUoT-9zAo0csy6XWZdFkm_WuZdF1EfBWlAvsDxMfW_qP6CetGydI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581615744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Guy, Brittany ; Dye, Mary Eva ; Richards, Laura ; Guthrie, Scott O. ; Hatch, L. Dupree</creator><creatorcontrib>Guy, Brittany ; Dye, Mary Eva ; Richards, Laura ; Guthrie, Scott O. ; Hatch, L. Dupree</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine the association of overnight extubation (OE) with extubation success. Study design Retrospective cohort study in three NICUs from 2016 to 2020. Infants without congenital anomalies, less than 1500 grams at birth, who were ventilated and received an extubation attempt were included. Primary exposure was OE (7:00 pm–6:59 am) and outcome was extubation success defined as no mechanical ventilation for at least 7 days after extubation. Results A total of 76/379 (20%) infants received OE. Infants extubated during the daytime were older and had higher illness severity markers. Extubation success rates did not differ for overnight (57/76, 75%) versus daytime extubations (231/303, 76%) after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). Conclusion Though infants in our cohort undergoing daytime and OE were dissimilar, extubation success rates did not differ. Larger multicenter studies are needed to test our findings and identify markers of extubation readiness in preterm infants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-8346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01168-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34304243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/308/174 ; 692/308/409 ; Artificial respiration ; Birth weight ; Birth weight, Low ; Care and treatment ; Cohort analysis ; Congenital anomalies ; Congenital defects ; Daytime ; Extubation ; Health aspects ; Infants ; Infants (Premature) ; Management ; Markers ; Mechanical ventilation ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methods ; Neonatal intensive care ; Patient outcomes ; Pediatric research ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Premature birth ; Success ; Time of use ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatology, 2021-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2532-2536</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9703-5266 ; 0000-0002-8735-1887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guy, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dye, Mary Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Scott O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, L. Dupree</creatorcontrib><title>Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study</title><title>Journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><description>Objective To determine the association of overnight extubation (OE) with extubation success. Study design Retrospective cohort study in three NICUs from 2016 to 2020. Infants without congenital anomalies, less than 1500 grams at birth, who were ventilated and received an extubation attempt were included. Primary exposure was OE (7:00 pm–6:59 am) and outcome was extubation success defined as no mechanical ventilation for at least 7 days after extubation. Results A total of 76/379 (20%) infants received OE. Infants extubated during the daytime were older and had higher illness severity markers. Extubation success rates did not differ for overnight (57/76, 75%) versus daytime extubations (231/303, 76%) after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). Conclusion Though infants in our cohort undergoing daytime and OE were dissimilar, extubation success rates did not differ. Larger multicenter studies are needed to test our findings and identify markers of extubation readiness in preterm infants.</description><subject>692/308/174</subject><subject>692/308/409</subject><subject>Artificial respiration</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Birth weight, Low</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Congenital anomalies</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Time of use</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0743-8346</issn><issn>1476-5543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi0EosvCH-BkCQlxSfFn4uWAtKr4kipx6d1ynMnGVWIX22m7_x6HVJRFCPkw8szzjmfGg9BrSs4p4ep9EpQ3rCKMVoTSWlX1E7ShoqkrKQV_ijakEbxSXNRn6EVK14QsweY5OuOCE8EE36Bpn1KwzmQXPA49zm6CxXbmiI3vMNznuV2jabYWUsLO41uIRzyGO9y6mIc7cIchF39vfE4fsMHTPGZnwWeI2IYhxIxTnrvjS_SsN2OCVw92i64-f7q6-Fpdfv_y7WJ_WVkpdrmiO8OlVLIVnFFVbkxI4JJK0YFgSpgeOitIR7q6pn2jSiuqJTtOoVNgLd-ij2vam7mdCloKiWbUN9FNJh51ME6fRrwb9CHcasWJWoa2Re8eEsTwY4aU9eSShXE0HsKcNJNSlnp2DS3om7_Q6zBHX7orlKI1lY0Qj9TBjKDLpEJ51y5J9b5WhAlKKSvU-T-ocjqYnA0eelf8J4K3fwgGMGMeUhjn5b_SKchW0MaQUoT-9zAo0csy6XWZdFkm_WuZdF1EfBWlAvsDxMfW_qP6CetGydI</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Guy, Brittany</creator><creator>Dye, Mary Eva</creator><creator>Richards, Laura</creator><creator>Guthrie, Scott O.</creator><creator>Hatch, L. Dupree</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-5266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-1887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study</title><author>Guy, Brittany ; Dye, Mary Eva ; Richards, Laura ; Guthrie, Scott O. ; Hatch, L. Dupree</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>692/308/174</topic><topic>692/308/409</topic><topic>Artificial respiration</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Birth weight, Low</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Congenital anomalies</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Time of use</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guy, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dye, Mary Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Scott O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, L. Dupree</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guy, Brittany</au><au>Dye, Mary Eva</au><au>Richards, Laura</au><au>Guthrie, Scott O.</au><au>Hatch, L. Dupree</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle><stitle>J Perinatol</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2532</spage><epage>2536</epage><pages>2532-2536</pages><issn>0743-8346</issn><eissn>1476-5543</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine the association of overnight extubation (OE) with extubation success. Study design Retrospective cohort study in three NICUs from 2016 to 2020. Infants without congenital anomalies, less than 1500 grams at birth, who were ventilated and received an extubation attempt were included. Primary exposure was OE (7:00 pm–6:59 am) and outcome was extubation success defined as no mechanical ventilation for at least 7 days after extubation. Results A total of 76/379 (20%) infants received OE. Infants extubated during the daytime were older and had higher illness severity markers. Extubation success rates did not differ for overnight (57/76, 75%) versus daytime extubations (231/303, 76%) after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.11). Conclusion Though infants in our cohort undergoing daytime and OE were dissimilar, extubation success rates did not differ. Larger multicenter studies are needed to test our findings and identify markers of extubation readiness in preterm infants.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>34304243</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41372-021-01168-6</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-5266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-1887</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-8346
ispartof Journal of perinatology, 2021-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2532-2536
issn 0743-8346
1476-5543
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8308074
source Nexis UK; Springer Nature
subjects 692/308/174
692/308/409
Artificial respiration
Birth weight
Birth weight, Low
Care and treatment
Cohort analysis
Congenital anomalies
Congenital defects
Daytime
Extubation
Health aspects
Infants
Infants (Premature)
Management
Markers
Mechanical ventilation
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Neonatal intensive care
Patient outcomes
Pediatric research
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Premature birth
Success
Time of use
Ventilation
title Association of time of day and extubation success in very low birthweight infants: a multicenter cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20time%20of%20day%20and%20extubation%20success%20in%20very%20low%20birthweight%20infants:%20a%20multicenter%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Guy,%20Brittany&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2532&rft.epage=2536&rft.pages=2532-2536&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.eissn=1476-5543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41372-021-01168-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA680241112%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-19a35585b4321819a245e35154de4284afedc40d0d661f784248b0931ed8ecc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581615744&rft_id=info:pmid/34304243&rft_galeid=A680241112&rfr_iscdi=true