Loading…

Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial

Objective Post-coercion review is increasingly regarded as a mean to reduce the negative consequences of coercive interventions, including the development of posttraumatic symptoms. However, the efficacy of this intervention in preventing posttraumatic symptoms or PTSD has not been sufficiently stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2021-09, Vol.271 (6), p.1077-1087
Main Authors: Wullschleger, Alexandre, Vandamme, Angelika, Mielau, Juliane, Renner, Lara, Bermpohl, Felix, Heinz, Andreas, Montag, Christiane, Mahler, Lieselotte
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23
container_end_page 1087
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1077
container_title European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
container_volume 271
creator Wullschleger, Alexandre
Vandamme, Angelika
Mielau, Juliane
Renner, Lara
Bermpohl, Felix
Heinz, Andreas
Montag, Christiane
Mahler, Lieselotte
description Objective Post-coercion review is increasingly regarded as a mean to reduce the negative consequences of coercive interventions, including the development of posttraumatic symptoms. However, the efficacy of this intervention in preventing posttraumatic symptoms or PTSD has not been sufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of a single, standardized post-coercion review session on the development or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders. Methods In a multi-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial, patients who experienced coercive interventions during current hospitalization were either randomized to standard treatment or an intervention group receiving a guideline-based, standardized reflecting review session. Factorial MANCOVA and subsequent ANCOVAs investigated the effects of the post-coercion reflecting review session on post-traumatic symptoms as measured by the subscales of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Similarly, the effect of the intervention on the intensity of the peritraumatic reactions measured by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) was analyzed by conducting a factorial ANCOVA. Results N  = 82 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. MANCOVA and post hoc ANCOVAs revealed a significant main effect of the intervention for the IES-R subscales intrusion and hyperarousal, when controlling for levels of peritraumatic distress, whereby intervention group participants presented lower respective mean scores. There was no significant difference regarding the intensity of the peritraumatic reaction. Conclusion Standardized post-coercion review contributes to a reduction of the burden of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders experiencing coercive interventions in acute settings and shall be recommended as a measure of trauma-informed care. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT03512925) on 01/30/2018 (retrospectively registered).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00406-020-01215-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8354865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559950841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhoNY7LH1D3ghC954Ezv52ux6IUhbtVBQsL0O2WxSt-xujplsP_z15vTUWr0QQjJhnnlnhpeQlwzeMgB9gAASagocKDDOFL15QlZMCkEb2bKnZAWtBMqEkLvkOeIlADDF4RnZFYILpjVbETwOwbtcxVBhtnNvUz_89H21jpipiz65Ic5V8leDv67QI26-5eDttM5xwk3h17NvR-8Kg8uYsQopTpWtUhGL052Wi3NOcRxLmNNgx32yE-yI_sX9u0fOPx6fHX6mp18-nRx-OKVOgc60a0GH3rrAgnV1J8Bz7hrJZKfKJTwXdS-41hokd0wLyaEpeNcJ2eq-42KPvN_qrpdu8r3zZQw7mnUaJptuTbSD-TszD9_NRbwyjVCyqVUReHMvkOKPxWM204DOj6OdfVzQcFlLphgTm16v_0Ev45Lmsp7hSrWtgjJ5ofiWcikiJh8ehmFgNp6araemeGruPDU3pejV4zUeSn6bWACxBbCk5guf_vT-j-wvmsyu-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559950841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Wullschleger, Alexandre ; Vandamme, Angelika ; Mielau, Juliane ; Renner, Lara ; Bermpohl, Felix ; Heinz, Andreas ; Montag, Christiane ; Mahler, Lieselotte</creator><creatorcontrib>Wullschleger, Alexandre ; Vandamme, Angelika ; Mielau, Juliane ; Renner, Lara ; Bermpohl, Felix ; Heinz, Andreas ; Montag, Christiane ; Mahler, Lieselotte</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Post-coercion review is increasingly regarded as a mean to reduce the negative consequences of coercive interventions, including the development of posttraumatic symptoms. However, the efficacy of this intervention in preventing posttraumatic symptoms or PTSD has not been sufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of a single, standardized post-coercion review session on the development or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders. Methods In a multi-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial, patients who experienced coercive interventions during current hospitalization were either randomized to standard treatment or an intervention group receiving a guideline-based, standardized reflecting review session. Factorial MANCOVA and subsequent ANCOVAs investigated the effects of the post-coercion reflecting review session on post-traumatic symptoms as measured by the subscales of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Similarly, the effect of the intervention on the intensity of the peritraumatic reactions measured by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) was analyzed by conducting a factorial ANCOVA. Results N  = 82 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. MANCOVA and post hoc ANCOVAs revealed a significant main effect of the intervention for the IES-R subscales intrusion and hyperarousal, when controlling for levels of peritraumatic distress, whereby intervention group participants presented lower respective mean scores. There was no significant difference regarding the intensity of the peritraumatic reaction. Conclusion Standardized post-coercion review contributes to a reduction of the burden of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders experiencing coercive interventions in acute settings and shall be recommended as a measure of trauma-informed care. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT03512925) on 01/30/2018 (retrospectively registered).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01215-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33231771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Coercion ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intervention ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Psychiatry ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Psychotic Disorders - therapy ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology ; Trauma ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021-09, Vol.271 (6), p.1077-1087</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>2020. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9282-8064</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33231771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wullschleger, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandamme, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielau, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bermpohl, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Lieselotte</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>Objective Post-coercion review is increasingly regarded as a mean to reduce the negative consequences of coercive interventions, including the development of posttraumatic symptoms. However, the efficacy of this intervention in preventing posttraumatic symptoms or PTSD has not been sufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of a single, standardized post-coercion review session on the development or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders. Methods In a multi-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial, patients who experienced coercive interventions during current hospitalization were either randomized to standard treatment or an intervention group receiving a guideline-based, standardized reflecting review session. Factorial MANCOVA and subsequent ANCOVAs investigated the effects of the post-coercion reflecting review session on post-traumatic symptoms as measured by the subscales of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Similarly, the effect of the intervention on the intensity of the peritraumatic reactions measured by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) was analyzed by conducting a factorial ANCOVA. Results N  = 82 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. MANCOVA and post hoc ANCOVAs revealed a significant main effect of the intervention for the IES-R subscales intrusion and hyperarousal, when controlling for levels of peritraumatic distress, whereby intervention group participants presented lower respective mean scores. There was no significant difference regarding the intensity of the peritraumatic reaction. Conclusion Standardized post-coercion review contributes to a reduction of the burden of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders experiencing coercive interventions in acute settings and shall be recommended as a measure of trauma-informed care. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT03512925) on 01/30/2018 (retrospectively registered).</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhoNY7LH1D3ghC954Ezv52ux6IUhbtVBQsL0O2WxSt-xujplsP_z15vTUWr0QQjJhnnlnhpeQlwzeMgB9gAASagocKDDOFL15QlZMCkEb2bKnZAWtBMqEkLvkOeIlADDF4RnZFYILpjVbETwOwbtcxVBhtnNvUz_89H21jpipiz65Ic5V8leDv67QI26-5eDttM5xwk3h17NvR-8Kg8uYsQopTpWtUhGL052Wi3NOcRxLmNNgx32yE-yI_sX9u0fOPx6fHX6mp18-nRx-OKVOgc60a0GH3rrAgnV1J8Bz7hrJZKfKJTwXdS-41hokd0wLyaEpeNcJ2eq-42KPvN_qrpdu8r3zZQw7mnUaJptuTbSD-TszD9_NRbwyjVCyqVUReHMvkOKPxWM204DOj6OdfVzQcFlLphgTm16v_0Ev45Lmsp7hSrWtgjJ5ofiWcikiJh8ehmFgNp6araemeGruPDU3pejV4zUeSn6bWACxBbCk5guf_vT-j-wvmsyu-Q</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Wullschleger, Alexandre</creator><creator>Vandamme, Angelika</creator><creator>Mielau, Juliane</creator><creator>Renner, Lara</creator><creator>Bermpohl, Felix</creator><creator>Heinz, Andreas</creator><creator>Montag, Christiane</creator><creator>Mahler, Lieselotte</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-8064</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Wullschleger, Alexandre ; Vandamme, Angelika ; Mielau, Juliane ; Renner, Lara ; Bermpohl, Felix ; Heinz, Andreas ; Montag, Christiane ; Mahler, Lieselotte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wullschleger, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandamme, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielau, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bermpohl, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Lieselotte</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wullschleger, Alexandre</au><au>Vandamme, Angelika</au><au>Mielau, Juliane</au><au>Renner, Lara</au><au>Bermpohl, Felix</au><au>Heinz, Andreas</au><au>Montag, Christiane</au><au>Mahler, Lieselotte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>271</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1077-1087</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>Objective Post-coercion review is increasingly regarded as a mean to reduce the negative consequences of coercive interventions, including the development of posttraumatic symptoms. However, the efficacy of this intervention in preventing posttraumatic symptoms or PTSD has not been sufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of a single, standardized post-coercion review session on the development or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders. Methods In a multi-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial, patients who experienced coercive interventions during current hospitalization were either randomized to standard treatment or an intervention group receiving a guideline-based, standardized reflecting review session. Factorial MANCOVA and subsequent ANCOVAs investigated the effects of the post-coercion reflecting review session on post-traumatic symptoms as measured by the subscales of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Similarly, the effect of the intervention on the intensity of the peritraumatic reactions measured by the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) was analyzed by conducting a factorial ANCOVA. Results N  = 82 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. MANCOVA and post hoc ANCOVAs revealed a significant main effect of the intervention for the IES-R subscales intrusion and hyperarousal, when controlling for levels of peritraumatic distress, whereby intervention group participants presented lower respective mean scores. There was no significant difference regarding the intensity of the peritraumatic reaction. Conclusion Standardized post-coercion review contributes to a reduction of the burden of PTSD symptoms in patients with psychotic disorders experiencing coercive interventions in acute settings and shall be recommended as a measure of trauma-informed care. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT03512925) on 01/30/2018 (retrospectively registered).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33231771</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-020-01215-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-8064</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-1334
ispartof European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021-09, Vol.271 (6), p.1077-1087
issn 0940-1334
1433-8491
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8354865
source Springer Nature
subjects Clinical trials
Coercion
Hospitalization
Humans
Intervention
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosciences
Original Paper
Patients
Post traumatic stress disorder
Psychiatry
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Psychotic Disorders - therapy
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology
Trauma
Treatment Outcome
title Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20standardized%20post-coercion%20review%20session%20on%20symptoms%20of%20PTSD:%20results%20from%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Wullschleger,%20Alexandre&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=271&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1077-1087&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-020-01215-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2559950841%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-b907fdacf1fac6b30e22c8414b54143e236d32777042c1734208dacbb3497db23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559950841&rft_id=info:pmid/33231771&rfr_iscdi=true