Influence of clinicians' experience and gender on extraction decision in orthodontics

• Published in: The Angle orthodontist 2017-09, Vol.87 (5), p.641-650
• Main Authors: Saghafi, Niousha, Heaton, Lisa J, Bayirli, Burcu, Turpin, David L, Khosravi, Roozbeh, Bollen, Anne-Marie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Decision Making; Esthetics, Dental; Female; Humans; Incisor; Male; Malocclusion, Angle Class I - therapy; Mandible; Observer Variation; Online Systems; Original; Orthodontics - statistics & numerical data; Orthodontics, Corrective - methods; Orthodontics, Corrective - statistics & numerical data; Orthodontists - education; Orthodontists - psychology; Pilot Projects; Practice Patterns, Physicians; Sex Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tooth Extraction - statistics & numerical data; Washington
• ISSN: 0003-3219; 1945-7103
• DOI: 10.2319/020117-80.1

To determine whether, in Class I borderline cases, experienced orthodontists choose nonextraction treatment more frequently than do orthodontists with less experience. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether clinicians' gender and place of education play a role in extraction decision making. An online survey was developed using three Class I borderline patient cases. The survey included questions about clinicians' demographics as well as questions about the selected cases. The survey was distributed to approximately 2000 clinicians through the American Association of Orthodontics. Of the 253 responses collected, a trend was observed wherein clinicians with more than 15 years of experience preferred an extraction treatment option more frequently than did clinicians with less than 5 years of experience. There was no association between gender and place of education and the decision to extract in the selected borderline cases. Crowding, patient's profile, and mandibular incisor inclination were among the top three reasons chosen by clinicians for both the extraction and nonextraction treatment decisions. A trend was observed in which clinicians with more experience chose an extraction treatment option more frequently in borderline cases than did those with less experience. Clinicians' gender did not play a role in extraction decision making.