Methodology for adaptation of the ASH Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism for the Latin American context

• Published in: Blood advances 2021-08, Vol.5 (15), p.3047-3052
• Main Authors: Neumann, Ignacio, Izcovich, Ariel, Alexander, Kendall E., Castano, Jenny, Plovnick, Robert, Kunkle, Robert, Zhang, Yuan, Aguilar, Ricardo, Basantes, Guillermo León, Casais, Patricia, Colorio, Cecilia C., Guillermo Esposito, María Cecilia, García Lázaro, Pedro P., Pereira, Jaime, Meillon-García, Luis A., Rezende, Suely Meireles, Serrano, Juan Carlos, Tejerina Valle, Mario L., Schünemann, Holger
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Guidelines
• ISSN: 2473-9529; 2473-9537
• DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004268

Background: From 2017 to 2020, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) collaborated with 12 hematology societies in Latin America to adapt the ASH guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective: To describe the methods used to adapt the ASH guidelines on venous thromboembolism. Methods: Each society nominated 1 individual to serve on the guideline panel. The work of the panel was facilitated by the 2 methodologists. The methods team selected 4 of the original VTE guidelines for a first round. To select the most relevant questions, a 2-step prioritization process was conducted through an on-line survey and then through in-person discussion. During an in-person meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 23 April through 26 April 2018, the panel developed recommendations using the ADOLOPMENT approach. Evidence about health effects from the original guidelines was reused, but important data about resource use, accessibility, feasibility, and impact in health equity were added. Results: In the guideline accompanying this paper, Latin American panelists selected 17 questions from an original pool of 49. Of the 17 questions addressed, substantial changes were introduced for 5 recommendations, and remarks were added or modified for 12 recommendations. Conclusions: By using the evidence from an international guideline, a significant amount of work and time were saved; by adding regional evidence, the final recommendations were tailored to the Latin American context. This experience offers an alternative to develop guidelines relevant to local contexts through a global collaboration.