Effects of climate variables on the transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review of 62 ecological studies

• Published in: Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-10, Vol.28 (39), p.54299-54316
• Main Authors: Zheng, Hu-Li, Guo, Ze-Li, Wang, Mei-ling, Yang, Chuan, An, Shu-Yi, Wu, Wei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic Pollution; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Bias; China; Climate; Climate change; Climate effects; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Disease control; Disease transmission; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecological studies; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental Health; Environmental science; Epidemics; Health Policy; High temperature; Humans; Public health; Quality assessment; Quality control; Respiratory diseases; Review; Review Article; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Systematic review; Viral diseases; Waste Water Technology; Water Management; Water Pollution Control
• ISSN: 0944-1344; 1614-7499
• DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15929-5

The new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was initially discovered at the end of 2019 in Wuhan City in China and has caused one of the most serious global public health crises. A collection and analysis of studies related to the association between COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) transmission and meteorological factors, such as humidity, is vital and indispensable for disease prevention and control. A comprehensive literature search using various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, was systematically performed to identify eligible studies from Dec 2019 to Feb 1, 2021. We also established six criteria to screen the literature to obtain high-quality literature with consistent research purposes. This systematic review included a total of 62 publications. The study period ranged from 1 to 8 months, with 6 papers considering incubation, and the lag effect of climate factors on COVID-19 activity being taken into account in 22 studies. After quality assessment, no study was found to have a high risk of bias, 30 studies were scored as having moderate risks of bias, and 32 studies were classified as having low risks of bias. The certainty of evidence was also graded as being low. When considering the existing scientific evidence, higher temperatures may slow the progression of the COVID-19 epidemic. However, during the course of the epidemic, these climate variables alone could not account for most of the variability. Therefore, countries should focus more on health policies while also taking into account the influence of weather.