Eruption rates of lower second premolars at different development stages evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography

• Published in: The Angle orthodontist 2017-07, Vol.87 (4), p.570-575
• Main Authors: Rinaldi, Mariana Roennau Lemos, de Lima, Eduardo Martinelli, de Menezes, Luciane Macedo, Rizzatto, Susana Maria Deon, Matje, Paulo Ricardo Baccarin, Ribeiro, Roberto Vanin Pinto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bicuspid - diagnostic imaging; Bicuspid - growth & development; Child; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dentistry; Female; Humans; Male; Mandible; Original; Retrospective Studies; Tooth Crown - diagnostic imaging; Tooth Crown - growth & development; Tooth Eruption
• ISSN: 0003-3219; 1945-7103
• DOI: 10.2319/071116-548.1

To evaluate and compare the eruption rates of lower second premolars (LPm2) at different developmental stages using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Retrospectively, 31 individuals (9.77 ± 1.25 years) had their LPm2 scored according to the Demirjian method, and afterwards they were split into three groups according to developmental stage, as follows: D = complete-formed crowns; E = root length less than crown height; and F = root length greater than or equal to crown height. Linear distances from the LPm2 crown tip to the anatomical reference line (ARL) and to the occlusal plane line (OPL) were measured in paired CBCT scans (T1, T2), taken with an average interval of 8.6 months between them. Eruption rates (mm/y) were calculated and then compared between groups. Eruption rates were greater for LPm2 at stage F than at stages D or E (P < .01) regardless of whether they were measured from the ARL (D = 2.84 mm/y; E = 2.55 mm/y; F = 5.38 mm/y) or from the OPL (D = 1.82 mm/y; E = 2.02 mm/y; F = 5.26 mm/y). Eruption rates evaluated from the ARL and the OPL had no statistically significant differences (P = .052), and a positive correlation (r = .79, P < .001) between them was observed. LPm2 at Demirjian stage F showed greater eruption rates than at stages D or E, regardless of whether rates were measured from the ARL or the OPL. Faster eruption is expected for LPm2 at stage F. Evaluation of the LPm2's developmental stage using CBCT can aid in clinical decision making regarding the correct timing for intervention.