Loading…

MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the latest test for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), was assessed against clinical evidence in 74 patients with definite or probable MS. MR imaging was positive in 55 (85%) of 65 patients with definite MS but in only one (11 %) of nine patients wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 1985, Vol.6 (5), p.683-690
Main Authors: SHELDON, J. J, SIDDHARTHAN, R, TOBIAS, J, SHEREMATA, W. A, SOILA, K, VIAMONTE, M. JR
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 690
container_issue 5
container_start_page 683
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 6
creator SHELDON, J. J
SIDDHARTHAN, R
TOBIAS, J
SHEREMATA, W. A
SOILA, K
VIAMONTE, M. JR
description Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the latest test for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), was assessed against clinical evidence in 74 patients with definite or probable MS. MR imaging was positive in 55 (85%) of 65 patients with definite MS but in only one (11 %) of nine patients with probable MS. The examination is most likely to be positive when the patient is classified clinically as having definite MS; when the disease is active and not in remission; and if the constellation of symptoms indicates a multiplicity of regions with neurologic dysfunction. The examination was most sensitive for detecting lesions in the cerebral hemispheres, the posterior fossa, and the cervical spinal cord, in that order; it did not detect any lesions in the optic nerves. The paraclinical tests and MR imaging were of equal sensitivity in detecting MS lesions, but the latter method was more specific in localization. Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation was slightly less sensitive than the other two tests. There was no correlation between MR imaging and these examinations. The authors conclude that MR imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT), which was positive in 25% of 59 patients with definite MS; it is always positive when CT is positive; and it probably can replace CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MS.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8367719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8367719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-f68a7d46d1864aca3baf61a20346bca37d8adac62b1b80360fa1cf480c118a2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LxDAYhIMo61r9Dzl4LSRNN0k9CLKoK6wIsoIXKW_TZPeVNClN149_b8FF8DQMA88wc0TmvBIyrxbV6zGZM14tcsmZPiVnKb0zxhaVKmZkxphkUos5eXt8ptjBFsOWRke7vR-x95Ym4-0QE6YramLXw4ApBvqJ444ajwENeAqhpcsNtV_QYYARY0gUA1Ul7Sdnw5jOyYkDn-zFQTPycne7Wa7y9dP9w_JmnfeFUGPupAbVlrLlWpZgQDTgJIeCiVI2k1WthhaMLBreaCYkc8CNKzUznGsorMjI9S-33zedbc3UPYCv-2GaNnzXEbD-nwTc1dv4UWshlZoey8jlAQBpmuYGCAbTH0CXWhS6Ej-bfWrt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><creator>SHELDON, J. J ; SIDDHARTHAN, R ; TOBIAS, J ; SHEREMATA, W. A ; SOILA, K ; VIAMONTE, M. JR</creator><creatorcontrib>SHELDON, J. J ; SIDDHARTHAN, R ; TOBIAS, J ; SHEREMATA, W. A ; SOILA, K ; VIAMONTE, M. JR</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the latest test for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), was assessed against clinical evidence in 74 patients with definite or probable MS. MR imaging was positive in 55 (85%) of 65 patients with definite MS but in only one (11 %) of nine patients with probable MS. The examination is most likely to be positive when the patient is classified clinically as having definite MS; when the disease is active and not in remission; and if the constellation of symptoms indicates a multiplicity of regions with neurologic dysfunction. The examination was most sensitive for detecting lesions in the cerebral hemispheres, the posterior fossa, and the cervical spinal cord, in that order; it did not detect any lesions in the optic nerves. The paraclinical tests and MR imaging were of equal sensitivity in detecting MS lesions, but the latter method was more specific in localization. Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation was slightly less sensitive than the other two tests. There was no correlation between MR imaging and these examinations. The authors conclude that MR imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT), which was positive in 25% of 59 patients with definite MS; it is always positive when CT is positive; and it probably can replace CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 0060683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 60683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJNDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Medical sciences ; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis ; Neurology</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 1985, Vol.6 (5), p.683-690</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>American Roentgen Ray Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367719/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367719/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8483289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHELDON, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIDDHARTHAN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOBIAS, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHEREMATA, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOILA, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VIAMONTE, M. JR</creatorcontrib><title>MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the latest test for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), was assessed against clinical evidence in 74 patients with definite or probable MS. MR imaging was positive in 55 (85%) of 65 patients with definite MS but in only one (11 %) of nine patients with probable MS. The examination is most likely to be positive when the patient is classified clinically as having definite MS; when the disease is active and not in remission; and if the constellation of symptoms indicates a multiplicity of regions with neurologic dysfunction. The examination was most sensitive for detecting lesions in the cerebral hemispheres, the posterior fossa, and the cervical spinal cord, in that order; it did not detect any lesions in the optic nerves. The paraclinical tests and MR imaging were of equal sensitivity in detecting MS lesions, but the latter method was more specific in localization. Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation was slightly less sensitive than the other two tests. There was no correlation between MR imaging and these examinations. The authors conclude that MR imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT), which was positive in 25% of 59 patients with definite MS; it is always positive when CT is positive; and it probably can replace CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MS.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LxDAYhIMo61r9Dzl4LSRNN0k9CLKoK6wIsoIXKW_TZPeVNClN149_b8FF8DQMA88wc0TmvBIyrxbV6zGZM14tcsmZPiVnKb0zxhaVKmZkxphkUos5eXt8ptjBFsOWRke7vR-x95Ym4-0QE6YramLXw4ApBvqJ444ajwENeAqhpcsNtV_QYYARY0gUA1Ul7Sdnw5jOyYkDn-zFQTPycne7Wa7y9dP9w_JmnfeFUGPupAbVlrLlWpZgQDTgJIeCiVI2k1WthhaMLBreaCYkc8CNKzUznGsorMjI9S-33zedbc3UPYCv-2GaNnzXEbD-nwTc1dv4UWshlZoey8jlAQBpmuYGCAbTH0CXWhS6Ej-bfWrt</recordid><startdate>1985</startdate><enddate>1985</enddate><creator>SHELDON, J. J</creator><creator>SIDDHARTHAN, R</creator><creator>TOBIAS, J</creator><creator>SHEREMATA, W. A</creator><creator>SOILA, K</creator><creator>VIAMONTE, M. JR</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1985</creationdate><title>MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients</title><author>SHELDON, J. J ; SIDDHARTHAN, R ; TOBIAS, J ; SHEREMATA, W. A ; SOILA, K ; VIAMONTE, M. JR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-f68a7d46d1864aca3baf61a20346bca37d8adac62b1b80360fa1cf480c118a2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHELDON, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIDDHARTHAN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOBIAS, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHEREMATA, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOILA, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VIAMONTE, M. JR</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHELDON, J. J</au><au>SIDDHARTHAN, R</au><au>TOBIAS, J</au><au>SHEREMATA, W. A</au><au>SOILA, K</au><au>VIAMONTE, M. JR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><date>1985</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>683-690</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><coden>AAJNDL</coden><abstract>Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the latest test for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), was assessed against clinical evidence in 74 patients with definite or probable MS. MR imaging was positive in 55 (85%) of 65 patients with definite MS but in only one (11 %) of nine patients with probable MS. The examination is most likely to be positive when the patient is classified clinically as having definite MS; when the disease is active and not in remission; and if the constellation of symptoms indicates a multiplicity of regions with neurologic dysfunction. The examination was most sensitive for detecting lesions in the cerebral hemispheres, the posterior fossa, and the cervical spinal cord, in that order; it did not detect any lesions in the optic nerves. The paraclinical tests and MR imaging were of equal sensitivity in detecting MS lesions, but the latter method was more specific in localization. Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation was slightly less sensitive than the other two tests. There was no correlation between MR imaging and these examinations. The authors conclude that MR imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT), which was positive in 25% of 59 patients with definite MS; it is always positive when CT is positive; and it probably can replace CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MS.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>0060683</pmid><pmid>60683</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 1985, Vol.6 (5), p.683-690
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8367719
source PMC (PubMed Central)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Medical sciences
Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis
Neurology
title MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20imaging%20of%20multiple%20sclerosis:%20comparison%20with%20clinical%20and%20CT%20examinations%20in%2074%20patients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=SHELDON,%20J.%20J&rft.date=1985&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=683-690&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft.coden=AAJNDL&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_pasca%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8367719%3C/pubmedcentral_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-f68a7d46d1864aca3baf61a20346bca37d8adac62b1b80360fa1cf480c118a2e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/0060683&rfr_iscdi=true