Public Perspectives on Decisions About Emergency Care Seeking for Care Unrelated to COVID-19 During the COVID-19 Pandemic

• Published in: JAMA network open 2021-08, Vol.4 (8), p.e2120940-e2120940
• Main Authors: Gale, Rebecca, Eberlein, Samuel, Fuller, Garth, Khalil, Carine, Almario, Christopher V., Spiegel, Brennan M.R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Appendicitis; Conjoint analysis; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Decision making; Emergency medical care; Heart attacks; Infectious Diseases; Online Only; Original Investigation; Pandemics; Sociodemographics
• ISSN: 2574-3805; 2574-3805
• DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20940

Importance Delaying critical care for treatable conditions owing to fear of contracting COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED) is associated with avoidable morbidity and mortality. Objective To assess and quantify how people decided whether to present to the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic for care unrelated to COVID-19 using conjoint analysis, a form of trade-off analysis that examines how individuals make complex decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a nationwide sample from June 1, 2020, during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Included participants were adults aged 18 years or older in the US who self-reported that they had not tested positive for COVID-19. Data were analyzed from July 2020 through May 2021. Exposures Participants completed a self-administered online survey. Main Outcomes and Measures Using a choice-based conjoint analysis survey, the relative importance was assessed for the following attributes for individuals in deciding whether to seek ED care for symptoms consistent with myocardial infarction or appendicitis: reduction in chance of dying because of ED treatment, crowdedness of ED with other patients, and chance of contracting COVID-19 in the ED. We also performed latent class analyses using conjoint data to identify distinct segments of the respondent population with similar choice patterns. Logistic regression was then used to explore whether patient sociodemographics and political affiliations were factors associated with decision-making. Results Among 1981 individuals invited to participate, 933 respondents (47.1%) completed the survey; participants’ mean (SD) age was 40.1 (13.0) years, and 491 (52.6%) were women. In latent class analyses, 158 individuals (16.9%) with symptoms of myocardial infarction and 238 individuals (25.5%) with symptoms of appendicitis prioritized avoidance of COVID-19 exposure in the ED (ie, chance of contracting COVID-19 in the ED or crowdedness of ED with other patients) over seeking appropriate care for symptoms. Having a usual source of care was a factor associated with lower odds of prioritizing avoidance of COVID-19 exposure (myocardial infarction scenario: adjusted odds ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32-0.76];P = .001; appendicitis scenario: adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40-0.82];P = .003), but most sociodemographic factors and political affiliations were not factors associated with decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance Th