Loading…
Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital
PURPOSETo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16785-e16785 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993 |
container_end_page | e16785 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e16785 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Singh, Arpana Gupta, Pratima Mathuria, Yogendra P Kalita, Deepjyoti Prasad, Amber Panda, Prasan K Bahurupi, Yogesh Sahoo, Biswajeet Omar, Balram Ji |
description | PURPOSETo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODSNasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. RESULTSWe tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONThe performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.16785 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8405413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572211691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIVktv_AAfOZBi52MdX5CWbKGVKhZll16tiT3ZGiV2sJNF_Cz-YbPdqiqneZp5895oHiHvObsUopCf9BRwipd8KcriFTlP-bJMSl7mr1_gM3IR4y_GGGciZYK9JWdZXvAsk-k5-Vf5foAAoz0gvTpAN83QO-pb-h2iH-4h_HV7hI6CM3QTXna2f6ChXyCioTUM1tDtqt4mlb9LUrpyo92jo2scUT8qHvfreS3Z2R5pvUt-VDVtfaBrC3vno41H02pzd7NOuKTW0R2G0c5utIKA9NrHwY7QvSNvWugiXjzVBfn59WpXXSe3m2831eo20ankY1IIWZYNy9q8MaWWHKFolm2GYBhomS9NI1MjTCF5aYxm0ArR5HNHct02TMpsQT6fdIep6dFodGOATg3B9vNNyoNV_0-cvVd7f1Blzop8fu-CfHgSCP73hHFUvY0auw4c-imqtBBpyvlS8pn68UTVwccYsH224Uwdg1anoNVj0NkDvqOdhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572211691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Singh, Arpana ; Gupta, Pratima ; Mathuria, Yogendra P ; Kalita, Deepjyoti ; Prasad, Amber ; Panda, Prasan K ; Bahurupi, Yogesh ; Sahoo, Biswajeet ; Omar, Balram Ji</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpana ; Gupta, Pratima ; Mathuria, Yogendra P ; Kalita, Deepjyoti ; Prasad, Amber ; Panda, Prasan K ; Bahurupi, Yogesh ; Sahoo, Biswajeet ; Omar, Balram Ji</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSETo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODSNasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. RESULTSWe tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONThe performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34513392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto (CA): Cureus</publisher><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16785-e16785</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Singh et al. 2021 Singh et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405413/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405413/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pratima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathuria, Yogendra P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalita, Deepjyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panda, Prasan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahurupi, Yogesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Biswajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Balram Ji</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>PURPOSETo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODSNasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. RESULTSWe tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONThe performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis.</description><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIVktv_AAfOZBi52MdX5CWbKGVKhZll16tiT3ZGiV2sJNF_Cz-YbPdqiqneZp5895oHiHvObsUopCf9BRwipd8KcriFTlP-bJMSl7mr1_gM3IR4y_GGGciZYK9JWdZXvAsk-k5-Vf5foAAoz0gvTpAN83QO-pb-h2iH-4h_HV7hI6CM3QTXna2f6ChXyCioTUM1tDtqt4mlb9LUrpyo92jo2scUT8qHvfreS3Z2R5pvUt-VDVtfaBrC3vno41H02pzd7NOuKTW0R2G0c5utIKA9NrHwY7QvSNvWugiXjzVBfn59WpXXSe3m2831eo20ankY1IIWZYNy9q8MaWWHKFolm2GYBhomS9NI1MjTCF5aYxm0ArR5HNHct02TMpsQT6fdIep6dFodGOATg3B9vNNyoNV_0-cvVd7f1Blzop8fu-CfHgSCP73hHFUvY0auw4c-imqtBBpyvlS8pn68UTVwccYsH224Uwdg1anoNVj0NkDvqOdhg</recordid><startdate>20210731</startdate><enddate>20210731</enddate><creator>Singh, Arpana</creator><creator>Gupta, Pratima</creator><creator>Mathuria, Yogendra P</creator><creator>Kalita, Deepjyoti</creator><creator>Prasad, Amber</creator><creator>Panda, Prasan K</creator><creator>Bahurupi, Yogesh</creator><creator>Sahoo, Biswajeet</creator><creator>Omar, Balram Ji</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210731</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital</title><author>Singh, Arpana ; Gupta, Pratima ; Mathuria, Yogendra P ; Kalita, Deepjyoti ; Prasad, Amber ; Panda, Prasan K ; Bahurupi, Yogesh ; Sahoo, Biswajeet ; Omar, Balram Ji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pratima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathuria, Yogendra P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalita, Deepjyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panda, Prasan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahurupi, Yogesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Biswajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Balram Ji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Arpana</au><au>Gupta, Pratima</au><au>Mathuria, Yogendra P</au><au>Kalita, Deepjyoti</au><au>Prasad, Amber</au><au>Panda, Prasan K</au><au>Bahurupi, Yogesh</au><au>Sahoo, Biswajeet</au><au>Omar, Balram Ji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2021-07-31</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e16785</spage><epage>e16785</epage><pages>e16785-e16785</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>PURPOSETo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODSNasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. RESULTSWe tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONThe performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto (CA)</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>34513392</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.16785</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16785-e16785 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8405413 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费) |
subjects | Infectious Disease |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Nasopharyngeal%20and%20Oropharyngeal%20Swab%20Based%20Rapid%20SARS-CoV-2%20Antigen%20Detection%20and%20Real-Time%20RT-PCR%20for%20Diagnosis%20of%20COVID-19%20in%20Tertiary%20Care%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Singh,%20Arpana&rft.date=2021-07-31&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e16785&rft.epage=e16785&rft.pages=e16785-e16785&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.16785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2572211691%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-57988b03f4bd8c91ea5b6f3ead0ac946db92d7d5918ddc0af77b42d791cfb0993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572211691&rft_id=info:pmid/34513392&rfr_iscdi=true |