Loading…

Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory

Most developmental event‐related potential (ERP) research uses experimental paradigms modified from research with adults. One major challenge is identifying how to adapt these paradigms effectively for use with younger individuals. This paper provides guidance for developmental adaptations by consid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental psychobiology 2021-09, Vol.63 (6), p.e22159-n/a
Main Authors: Rollins, Leslie, Riggins, Tracy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e22159
container_title Developmental psychobiology
container_volume 63
creator Rollins, Leslie
Riggins, Tracy
description Most developmental event‐related potential (ERP) research uses experimental paradigms modified from research with adults. One major challenge is identifying how to adapt these paradigms effectively for use with younger individuals. This paper provides guidance for developmental adaptations by considering research on the development of recognition memory. We provide a brief overview of recognition memory tasks and ERP components associated with recognition memory in children and adults. Then, we provide some general recommendations, discuss common differences between ERP studies of recognition memory in adults and children (e.g., the type of stimuli presented, response modalities), and provide suggestions for assessing the effect of task modifications on ERP components of interest. Specifically, we recommend (a) testing both children and adults on the modified paradigm to allow for a continuity of findings across development, (b) comparing children of different ages on the modified paradigm based on expectations regarding when developmental change occurs for the cognitive process of interest, and (c) empirically assessing the effect of methodological differences between paradigms. To illustrate the latter, we analyzed data from our lab comparing memory‐related ERP components when children experienced a 1‐day, 2‐day, or 1‐week delay between encoding and retrieval.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dev.22159
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8410656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557536190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi2UCDZAwQtELkMx4Mt4LikioQ2BSEg0QGt57ONdI894Ys8u2i5tujxjniSGJSQUqXw5__nOb_8IHVFyQglhpwbWJ4xR0e6gGSVtUzBO2Bs0I4Syglac7KF3Kd3nIy2behft8ZJzXtftDP04M2qc3LDAsIZh-vX9ZwSvJjB4DFO-cMrjCAlU1Es8qqiMW_QJ2xCxXjpvIgwf8TwMyRmIanJ5h20M_d-mMOBpCTh7BB_GPjNxsLmsw2Jwjw24hz7EzQF6a5VPcPi87qPbL-c388vi6vri6_zsqtBlfmHRMcEUrRuiW2GhMsq2xtTWgGg07xRvRCc60FabkiiqKWPM1pVmVrScN8D5Pvq05Y6rrgejs6GovByj61XcyKCcfF0Z3FIuwlo2JSWVqDLgwzMghm8rSJPsXdLgvRogrJJkQtSCV7QlWXq8leoYUopgX8ZQIh-jk_lb5FN0Wfv-X18vyj9ZZcHpVvDgPGz-T5Kfz--2yN815KmD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557536190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Rollins, Leslie ; Riggins, Tracy</creator><creatorcontrib>Rollins, Leslie ; Riggins, Tracy</creatorcontrib><description>Most developmental event‐related potential (ERP) research uses experimental paradigms modified from research with adults. One major challenge is identifying how to adapt these paradigms effectively for use with younger individuals. This paper provides guidance for developmental adaptations by considering research on the development of recognition memory. We provide a brief overview of recognition memory tasks and ERP components associated with recognition memory in children and adults. Then, we provide some general recommendations, discuss common differences between ERP studies of recognition memory in adults and children (e.g., the type of stimuli presented, response modalities), and provide suggestions for assessing the effect of task modifications on ERP components of interest. Specifically, we recommend (a) testing both children and adults on the modified paradigm to allow for a continuity of findings across development, (b) comparing children of different ages on the modified paradigm based on expectations regarding when developmental change occurs for the cognitive process of interest, and (c) empirically assessing the effect of methodological differences between paradigms. To illustrate the latter, we analyzed data from our lab comparing memory‐related ERP components when children experienced a 1‐day, 2‐day, or 1‐week delay between encoding and retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2302</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dev.22159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34333779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child ; children ; delay ; Electroencephalography ; ERP ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Humans ; methods ; recognition memory ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychobiology, 2021-09, Vol.63 (6), p.e22159-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4247-1412</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rollins, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggins, Tracy</creatorcontrib><title>Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory</title><title>Developmental psychobiology</title><addtitle>Dev Psychobiol</addtitle><description>Most developmental event‐related potential (ERP) research uses experimental paradigms modified from research with adults. One major challenge is identifying how to adapt these paradigms effectively for use with younger individuals. This paper provides guidance for developmental adaptations by considering research on the development of recognition memory. We provide a brief overview of recognition memory tasks and ERP components associated with recognition memory in children and adults. Then, we provide some general recommendations, discuss common differences between ERP studies of recognition memory in adults and children (e.g., the type of stimuli presented, response modalities), and provide suggestions for assessing the effect of task modifications on ERP components of interest. Specifically, we recommend (a) testing both children and adults on the modified paradigm to allow for a continuity of findings across development, (b) comparing children of different ages on the modified paradigm based on expectations regarding when developmental change occurs for the cognitive process of interest, and (c) empirically assessing the effect of methodological differences between paradigms. To illustrate the latter, we analyzed data from our lab comparing memory‐related ERP components when children experienced a 1‐day, 2‐day, or 1‐week delay between encoding and retrieval.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>delay</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>ERP</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>recognition memory</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><issn>0012-1630</issn><issn>1098-2302</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi2UCDZAwQtELkMx4Mt4LikioQ2BSEg0QGt57ONdI894Ys8u2i5tujxjniSGJSQUqXw5__nOb_8IHVFyQglhpwbWJ4xR0e6gGSVtUzBO2Bs0I4Syglac7KF3Kd3nIy2behft8ZJzXtftDP04M2qc3LDAsIZh-vX9ZwSvJjB4DFO-cMrjCAlU1Es8qqiMW_QJ2xCxXjpvIgwf8TwMyRmIanJ5h20M_d-mMOBpCTh7BB_GPjNxsLmsw2Jwjw24hz7EzQF6a5VPcPi87qPbL-c388vi6vri6_zsqtBlfmHRMcEUrRuiW2GhMsq2xtTWgGg07xRvRCc60FabkiiqKWPM1pVmVrScN8D5Pvq05Y6rrgejs6GovByj61XcyKCcfF0Z3FIuwlo2JSWVqDLgwzMghm8rSJPsXdLgvRogrJJkQtSCV7QlWXq8leoYUopgX8ZQIh-jk_lb5FN0Wfv-X18vyj9ZZcHpVvDgPGz-T5Kfz--2yN815KmD</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Rollins, Leslie</creator><creator>Riggins, Tracy</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4247-1412</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory</title><author>Rollins, Leslie ; Riggins, Tracy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>delay</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>ERP</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>recognition memory</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rollins, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggins, Tracy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rollins, Leslie</au><au>Riggins, Tracy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Psychobiol</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e22159</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e22159-n/a</pages><issn>0012-1630</issn><eissn>1098-2302</eissn><abstract>Most developmental event‐related potential (ERP) research uses experimental paradigms modified from research with adults. One major challenge is identifying how to adapt these paradigms effectively for use with younger individuals. This paper provides guidance for developmental adaptations by considering research on the development of recognition memory. We provide a brief overview of recognition memory tasks and ERP components associated with recognition memory in children and adults. Then, we provide some general recommendations, discuss common differences between ERP studies of recognition memory in adults and children (e.g., the type of stimuli presented, response modalities), and provide suggestions for assessing the effect of task modifications on ERP components of interest. Specifically, we recommend (a) testing both children and adults on the modified paradigm to allow for a continuity of findings across development, (b) comparing children of different ages on the modified paradigm based on expectations regarding when developmental change occurs for the cognitive process of interest, and (c) empirically assessing the effect of methodological differences between paradigms. To illustrate the latter, we analyzed data from our lab comparing memory‐related ERP components when children experienced a 1‐day, 2‐day, or 1‐week delay between encoding and retrieval.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34333779</pmid><doi>10.1002/dev.22159</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4247-1412</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1630
ispartof Developmental psychobiology, 2021-09, Vol.63 (6), p.e22159-n/a
issn 0012-1630
1098-2302
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8410656
source Wiley
subjects Adult
Child
children
delay
Electroencephalography
ERP
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Humans
methods
recognition memory
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
title Adapting event‐related potential research paradigms for children: Considerations from research on the development of recognition memory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A10%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adapting%20event%E2%80%90related%20potential%20research%20paradigms%20for%20children:%20Considerations%20from%20research%20on%20the%20development%20of%20recognition%20memory&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychobiology&rft.au=Rollins,%20Leslie&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e22159&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e22159-n/a&rft.issn=0012-1630&rft.eissn=1098-2302&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dev.22159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2557536190%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4159-b252a1780c95fe6daf9dd7fde58c3ba385b5becfcd40a1c1222f76c2f59338e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557536190&rft_id=info:pmid/34333779&rfr_iscdi=true