Loading…

Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19

BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has till now affected about 110 million people globally. It has not spared any country and has led to 24 lakh deaths. As a result, the testing had to be increased manifold leading to depletion in the number of the quantitative reverse transcription polym...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17405-e17405
Main Authors: Pandey, Ashok Kumar, Mohanty, Aroop, Hada, Vivek, Rath, Rama S, Kumar, Subodh, Kishore, Surekha, Kant, Rajni
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613
container_end_page e17405
container_issue 8
container_start_page e17405
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 13
creator Pandey, Ashok Kumar
Mohanty, Aroop
Hada, Vivek
Rath, Rama S
Kumar, Subodh
Kishore, Surekha
Kant, Rajni
description BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has till now affected about 110 million people globally. It has not spared any country and has led to 24 lakh deaths. As a result, the testing had to be increased manifold leading to depletion in the number of the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) kits. Point-of-care rapid antigen-based tests were developed in order to meet the increasing demands. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a rapid chromatographic test (index test) with a gold standard test (RT-qPCR). METHODSA retrospective analysis was done at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the clinic for antigen-based rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RDT. RESULTSThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDT were observed to be 53.6% (39.7-67.0) and 97.35% (94.6-98.9), respectively. In symptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was higher 61.0% (44.5-75.8). The test positivity rates of RDT were found to be higher at a ​​cycle threshold value ≤20. CONCLUSIONRDT can be used as a screening test to rule in the infection especially in symptomatic patients who are more prone to spread the disease. It is an important weapon in the armamentarium of public healthcare for the containment of COVID-19.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.17405
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8459390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578148054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9LAzEQxYMotlRvfoAcPbh1ZrNpshdB1n-FilKq4ikk22wbaTc12RX89q62iJ5mmHnzewyPkBOEoRA8Py_bYNs4RJEB3yP9FEcykSiz_T99jxzH-AYACCIFAYekxzIuc4ajPnkt_Hqjg4u-pr6izdLSqd64Ob2sG7ewNZ3Z2Lh6Qe9ts_Rz-uKaJZ3OkvfHYkorH34urpxe1D66-I0oHp7HVwnmR-Sg0qtoj3d1QJ5urmfFXTJ5uB0Xl5OkTHNsEgNSylTYecm0MJpzQG7QGDApZmCxG851ZRArWzIrRyCFLQVkaBhoNkI2IBdb7qY16w5j6yboldoEt9bhU3nt1P9N7ZZq4T-UzHjOcugApztA8O9t965au1ja1UrX1rdRpVxIzCTwrJOebaVl8DEGW_3aIKjvQNQ2EPUTCPsCkWV9RQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578148054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Pandey, Ashok Kumar ; Mohanty, Aroop ; Hada, Vivek ; Rath, Rama S ; Kumar, Subodh ; Kishore, Surekha ; Kant, Rajni</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Ashok Kumar ; Mohanty, Aroop ; Hada, Vivek ; Rath, Rama S ; Kumar, Subodh ; Kishore, Surekha ; Kant, Rajni</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has till now affected about 110 million people globally. It has not spared any country and has led to 24 lakh deaths. As a result, the testing had to be increased manifold leading to depletion in the number of the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) kits. Point-of-care rapid antigen-based tests were developed in order to meet the increasing demands. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a rapid chromatographic test (index test) with a gold standard test (RT-qPCR). METHODSA retrospective analysis was done at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the clinic for antigen-based rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RDT. RESULTSThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDT were observed to be 53.6% (39.7-67.0) and 97.35% (94.6-98.9), respectively. In symptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was higher 61.0% (44.5-75.8). The test positivity rates of RDT were found to be higher at a ​​cycle threshold value ≤20. CONCLUSIONRDT can be used as a screening test to rule in the infection especially in symptomatic patients who are more prone to spread the disease. It is an important weapon in the armamentarium of public healthcare for the containment of COVID-19.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17405</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34589316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto (CA): Cureus</publisher><subject>Epidemiology/Public Health ; Infectious Disease ; Internal Medicine</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17405-e17405</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Pandey et al. 2021 Pandey et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459390/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459390/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,36996,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Ashok Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Aroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hada, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, Rama S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Subodh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishore, Surekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kant, Rajni</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has till now affected about 110 million people globally. It has not spared any country and has led to 24 lakh deaths. As a result, the testing had to be increased manifold leading to depletion in the number of the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) kits. Point-of-care rapid antigen-based tests were developed in order to meet the increasing demands. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a rapid chromatographic test (index test) with a gold standard test (RT-qPCR). METHODSA retrospective analysis was done at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the clinic for antigen-based rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RDT. RESULTSThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDT were observed to be 53.6% (39.7-67.0) and 97.35% (94.6-98.9), respectively. In symptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was higher 61.0% (44.5-75.8). The test positivity rates of RDT were found to be higher at a ​​cycle threshold value ≤20. CONCLUSIONRDT can be used as a screening test to rule in the infection especially in symptomatic patients who are more prone to spread the disease. It is an important weapon in the armamentarium of public healthcare for the containment of COVID-19.</description><subject>Epidemiology/Public Health</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU9LAzEQxYMotlRvfoAcPbh1ZrNpshdB1n-FilKq4ikk22wbaTc12RX89q62iJ5mmHnzewyPkBOEoRA8Py_bYNs4RJEB3yP9FEcykSiz_T99jxzH-AYACCIFAYekxzIuc4ajPnkt_Hqjg4u-pr6izdLSqd64Ob2sG7ewNZ3Z2Lh6Qe9ts_Rz-uKaJZ3OkvfHYkorH34urpxe1D66-I0oHp7HVwnmR-Sg0qtoj3d1QJ5urmfFXTJ5uB0Xl5OkTHNsEgNSylTYecm0MJpzQG7QGDApZmCxG851ZRArWzIrRyCFLQVkaBhoNkI2IBdb7qY16w5j6yboldoEt9bhU3nt1P9N7ZZq4T-UzHjOcugApztA8O9t965au1ja1UrX1rdRpVxIzCTwrJOebaVl8DEGW_3aIKjvQNQ2EPUTCPsCkWV9RQ</recordid><startdate>20210824</startdate><enddate>20210824</enddate><creator>Pandey, Ashok Kumar</creator><creator>Mohanty, Aroop</creator><creator>Hada, Vivek</creator><creator>Rath, Rama S</creator><creator>Kumar, Subodh</creator><creator>Kishore, Surekha</creator><creator>Kant, Rajni</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210824</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19</title><author>Pandey, Ashok Kumar ; Mohanty, Aroop ; Hada, Vivek ; Rath, Rama S ; Kumar, Subodh ; Kishore, Surekha ; Kant, Rajni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Epidemiology/Public Health</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Ashok Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Aroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hada, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, Rama S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Subodh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishore, Surekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kant, Rajni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandey, Ashok Kumar</au><au>Mohanty, Aroop</au><au>Hada, Vivek</au><au>Rath, Rama S</au><au>Kumar, Subodh</au><au>Kishore, Surekha</au><au>Kant, Rajni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2021-08-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e17405</spage><epage>e17405</epage><pages>e17405-e17405</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has till now affected about 110 million people globally. It has not spared any country and has led to 24 lakh deaths. As a result, the testing had to be increased manifold leading to depletion in the number of the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) kits. Point-of-care rapid antigen-based tests were developed in order to meet the increasing demands. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a rapid chromatographic test (index test) with a gold standard test (RT-qPCR). METHODSA retrospective analysis was done at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Paired samples were taken from all patients reporting to the clinic for antigen-based rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) and RT-qPCR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the RDT. RESULTSThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDT were observed to be 53.6% (39.7-67.0) and 97.35% (94.6-98.9), respectively. In symptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was higher 61.0% (44.5-75.8). The test positivity rates of RDT were found to be higher at a ​​cycle threshold value ≤20. CONCLUSIONRDT can be used as a screening test to rule in the infection especially in symptomatic patients who are more prone to spread the disease. It is an important weapon in the armamentarium of public healthcare for the containment of COVID-19.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto (CA)</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>34589316</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.17405</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17405-e17405
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8459390
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Epidemiology/Public Health
Infectious Disease
Internal Medicine
title Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Rapid%20Antigen%20Testing%20Method%20With%20RT-qPCR%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Pandey,%20Ashok%20Kumar&rft.date=2021-08-24&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e17405&rft.epage=e17405&rft.pages=e17405-e17405&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.17405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2578148054%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-b088827edc3a7ba55015b1bb0b2140e1a7bdafb11fec3e86087ec7041b30a3613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578148054&rft_id=info:pmid/34589316&rfr_iscdi=true