Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Sedated with Intravenous Lormetazepam or Midazolam: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The benzodiazepine, midazolam, is one of the most frequently used sedatives in intensive care medicine, but it has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile when continuously applied. As a consequence, patients are frequently prolonged and more deeply sedated than intended. Due to its distinct pharmaco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2021-09, Vol.10 (18), p.4091
Main Authors: Weiss, Björn, Hilfrich, David, Vorderwülbecke, Gerald, Heinrich, Maria, Grunow, Julius J., Paul, Nicolas, Kruppa, Jochen, Neuner, Bruno, Drexler, Berthold, Balzer, Felix, Spies, Claudia D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesia
Benzodiazepines
Clinical medicine
Cohort analysis
Cytochrome
Delirium
Hospitals
Intensive care
Length of stay
Metabolites
Mortality
Pain
Patients
Values
Ventilators
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The benzodiazepine, midazolam, is one of the most frequently used sedatives in intensive care medicine, but it has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile when continuously applied. As a consequence, patients are frequently prolonged and more deeply sedated than intended. Due to its distinct pharmacological features, including a cytochrome P450-independent metabolization, intravenous lormetazepam might be clinically advantageous compared to midazolam. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared patients who received either intravenous lormetazepam or midazolam with respect to their survival and sedation characteristics. The cohort included 3314 mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients that received one of the two drugs in a tertiary medical center in Germany between 2006 and 2018. A Cox proportional hazards model with mortality as outcome and APACHE II, age, gender, and admission mode as covariates revealed a hazard ratio of 1.75 [95% CI 1.46–2.09; p < 0.001] for in-hospital mortality associated with the use of midazolam. After additionally adjusting for sedation intensity, the HR became 1.04 [95% CI 0.83–1.31; p = 0.97]. Thus, we concluded that excessive sedation occurs more frequently in critically ill patients treated with midazolam than in patients treated with lormetazepam. These findings require further investigation in prospective trials to assess if lormetazepam, due to its ability to maintain light sedation, might be favorable over other benzodiazepines for sedation in the ICU.
ISSN:2077-0383
2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm10184091