Using Low-Cost Sensors to Assess Fine Particulate Matter Infiltration (PM2.5) during a Wildfire Smoke Episode at a Large Inpatient Healthcare Facility

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-09, Vol.18 (18), p.9811
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Phuong D. M., Martinussen, Nika, Mallach, Gary, Ebrahimi, Ghazal, Jones, Kori, Zimmerman, Naomi, Henderson, Sarah B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air quality; Airborne particulates; Building construction; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cooling; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Eggs; Flooring; Health care; Health care facilities; Health facilities; Humidity; HVAC; Indoor air pollution; Indoor air quality; Indoor environments; Infiltration coefficient; Low cost; Outdoor air quality; Pandemics; Particulate matter; Precipitation; Rehabilitation; Relative humidity; Sensors; Smoke; Ventilation; Wildfires
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189811

Wildfire smoke exposure is associated with a range of acute health outcomes, which can be more severe in individuals with underlying health conditions. Currently, there is limited information on the susceptibility of healthcare facilities to smoke infiltration. As part of a larger study to address this gap, a rehabilitation facility in Vancouver, Canada was outfitted with one outdoor and seven indoor low-cost fine particulate matter (PM2.5) sensors in Air Quality Eggs (EGG) during the summer of 2020. Raw measurements were calibrated using temperature, relative humidity, and dew point derived from the EGG data. The infiltration coefficient was quantified using a distributed lag model. Indoor concentrations during the smoke episode were elevated throughout the building, though non-uniformly. After censoring indoor-only peaks, the average infiltration coefficient (range) during typical days was 0.32 (0.22–0.39), compared with 0.37 (0.31–0.47) during the smoke episode, a 19% increase on average. Indoor PM2.5 concentrations quickly reflected outdoor conditions during and after the smoke episode. It is unclear whether these results will be generalizable to other years due to COVID-related changes to building operations, but some of the safety protocols may offer valuable lessons for future wildfire seasons. For example, points of building entry and exit were reduced from eight to two during the pandemic, which likely helped to protect the building from wildfire smoke infiltration. Overall, these results demonstrate the utility of indoor low-cost sensors in understanding the impacts of extreme smoke events on facilities where highly susceptible individuals are present. Furthermore, they highlight the need to employ interventions that enhance indoor air quality in such facilities during smoke events.