Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2022-02, Vol.26 (2), p.1797-1810
• Main Authors: Andrade, Carlos Alexandre Soares, Paz, João Lucas Carvalho, de Melo, Gabriel Simino, Mahrouseh, Nour, Januário, Alessandro Lourenço, Capeletti, Lucas Raineri
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bone loss; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental prosthetics; Dental Restoration Failure; Dentistry; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent); Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications; Humans; Hygiene; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Mechanical loading; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Oral hygiene; Original; Original Article; Patients; Rehabilitation; Risk factors; Survival; Survival Rate
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04154-6

Objectives To evaluate the survival rate, success rate, and peri-implant biological changes of immediately loaded dental implants (ILs) placed in type 2 diabetic patients (DM2). Materials and methods The present study was registered on PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA checklist. The search was performed by the first reviewer in January 2021. The electronic databases used were MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature. The risk of bias analysis was performed using an instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results A total of 3566 titles and abstracts were obtained. The qualitative synthesis included 7 studies, while the quantitative synthesis included 5 studies. The meta-analysis of IL in individuals with DM2 compared to nondiabetic individuals showed no significant difference among the groups regarding the survival rate of dental implants (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.96–1.04; p  = 0.91; I 2  = 0%), even if the patient had poor glycemic control (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.87–1.33; p  = 0.48; I 2  = 70%). Meta-analysis of marginal bone loss in IL compared to conventional loading in DM2 patients also showed no significant difference (mean difference =  − 0.08, 95% CI − 0.25–0.08; p  = 0.33; I 2  = 83%). Conclusions Type 2 diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a risk factor for immediately loaded implants if the glycemic level is controlled, the oral hygiene is satisfactory, and the technical steps are strictly followed. Clinical relevance Rehabilitation in diabetic individuals is more common due to the highest prevalence of edentulism in this population. It is essential to establish appropriate protocols for loading dental implants.