The Effects of Three Remineralizing Agents on the Microhardness and Chemical Composition of Demineralized Enamel

This study aimed to determine the effects of three different varnish materials (containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite, and fluoride) on enamel. Thirty-three extracted human third molars were used for specimen preparation. These were demineralized using pho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials 2021-10, Vol.14 (20), p.6051
Main Authors: Salinovic, Ivan, Schauperl, Zdravko, Marcius, Marijan, Miletic, Ivana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Amorphous materials
Calcium fluoride
Calcium phosphates
Casein
Chemical composition
Chemical elements
Demineralizing
Dentistry
Enamel
Fluorides
Hydroxyapatite
Medicine
Phosphoric acid
Scanning electron microscopy
Specimen preparation
Toothpaste
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to determine the effects of three different varnish materials (containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite, and fluoride) on enamel. Thirty-three extracted human third molars were used for specimen preparation. These were demineralized using phosphoric acid. Three experimental groups (n = 11) were treated with 3M™ Clinpro™ White Varnish, MI Varnish®, and Megasonex® toothpaste, respectively, every twenty-four hours for fourteen days. Analysis of the microhardness of the specimens’ enamel surfaces was carried out via the Vickers method, and by scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). Analysis was performed at three stages: at baseline value, after demineralization, and after the period of remineralization. Data were subjected to Scheffe’s post hoc test. The mean microhardness values (HV0.1) obtained for the group of samples treated with MI Varnish® were higher compared with the other two groups (p = 0.001 for both comparisons), while the first and third groups did not differ significantly from each other (p = 0.97). SEM analysis showed uneven patterns and porosities on all samples tested. EDS results showed an increase in the mineral content of the examined samples, with the highest mineral content observed in the MI Varnish® group. It can be concluded that MI Varnish® use has a better remineralization effect on enamel than the other two materials.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma14206051