When apologies become meaningful: Perceptions of apologies in environmental justice communities

• Published in: Journal of environmental psychology 2021-10, Vol.77, p.101675, Article 101675
• Main Authors: Perez, Michael J., Crist, Jaren D., Kirsch, Katie R., Salter, Phia S., Horney, Jennifer A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Environmental justice communities; Environmental racism; Public apologies
• ISSN: 0272-4944; 1522-9610
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101675

In the United States, people of color from low income and working-class backgrounds are at disproportionate risk to pollution and other environmental stressors. These environmental justice communities (EJCs) can also experience increased risk when a natural disaster collides with a preexisting environmental risk. The current research is an exploratory field study that examines perceptions of environmental risk after a natural disaster and how meaningful a public apology would be in three communities. Residents (N = 161) in two EJCs and a community without documented risks reported their environmental concerns and perceptions of public apologies. Overall, EJC residents reported greater concern about chemical hazard exposure than did residents with decreased risk. Furthermore, chemical exposure concerns facilitated public apology meaningfulness within the EJCs, but not in the decreased risk community. •Communities of color report the greatest concerns for chemical exposure risk.•Chemical risk concerns facilitate public apology support in communities of color.•Residents in Houston, TX are concerned about environmental hazards and their health.