Loading…

Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty

Objective The objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge. Background Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adapt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human factors 2021-12, Vol.63 (8), p.1324-1341
Main Authors: Jokinen, Jussi P. P., Kujala, Tuomo, Oulasvirta, Antti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3
container_end_page 1341
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1324
container_title Human factors
container_volume 63
creator Jokinen, Jussi P. P.
Kujala, Tuomo
Oulasvirta, Antti
description Objective The objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge. Background Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment. Method We model the driver’s decision to deploy visual attention as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem and propose hierarchical reinforcement learning as a computationally tractable solution to it. The supervisory level deploys attention based on per-task value estimates, which incorporate beliefs about risk. Model simulations are compared against human data collected in a driving simulator. Results Human data show adaptation to the attentional demands of ongoing tasks, as measured in lane deviation and in-car gaze deployment. The predictions of our model fit the human data on these metrics. Conclusion Multitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility. Safe and unsafe behaviors emerge as the driver has to arbitrate between conflicting goals and manage uncertainty about them. Application Simulations can inform studies of conditions that are likely to give rise to unsafe driving behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0018720820927687
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8593310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0018720820927687</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429784273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnR6PjYuzJN3LipciktdKOZ-E40s3HWhAId0Q4dgZr472UyvhMXPJLz3cO5XIT2AR8DMHaCMXBGMCe4JqzibA2NoKQs58BhHY2Wcr7Ut9B2CE8Y46ouyk20VRBWAKuKETq7H7poowzP1s0y67ILb1-XVxmyySLaueyysZaLKKPtXTZ12vi0K-OjtC6-7aKNVnbB7H2cO2h6dflwfpPfTa5vz8d3uaIViblkSqdVU94yqRvCC6JVA6BUCgWtwlQbKKEmFWnrqi2hkrjhDdaguGbaFDvodOW7GJq50cq46GUnFj4l9G-il1b8Vpx9FLP-VfCyLgrAyeDow8D3L4MJUcxtUKbrpDP9EAShpGacpo9J6OEf9KkfvEvtCVLWjFFaUkgUXlHK9yF4036FASyW0xF_p5NKDn428VXwOY4E5CsgyJn5fvVfw3fAvJdy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597744541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Jokinen, Jussi P. P. ; Kujala, Tuomo ; Oulasvirta, Antti</creator><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Jussi P. P. ; Kujala, Tuomo ; Oulasvirta, Antti</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge. Background Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment. Method We model the driver’s decision to deploy visual attention as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem and propose hierarchical reinforcement learning as a computationally tractable solution to it. The supervisory level deploys attention based on per-task value estimates, which incorporate beliefs about risk. Model simulations are compared against human data collected in a driving simulator. Results Human data show adaptation to the attentional demands of ongoing tasks, as measured in lane deviation and in-car gaze deployment. The predictions of our model fit the human data on these metrics. Conclusion Multitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility. Safe and unsafe behaviors emerge as the driver has to arbitrate between conflicting goals and manage uncertainty about them. Application Simulations can inform studies of conditions that are likely to give rise to unsafe driving behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0018720820927687</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32731763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Arbitration ; Attention ; Attention task ; Automobile Driving ; Behavior ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Decision making ; Humans ; Multitasking ; Simulation ; Uncertainty ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2021-12, Vol.63 (8), p.1324-1341</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2020 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8222-8540 ; 0000-0002-3024-2209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Jussi P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Tuomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulasvirta, Antti</creatorcontrib><title>Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Objective The objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge. Background Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment. Method We model the driver’s decision to deploy visual attention as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem and propose hierarchical reinforcement learning as a computationally tractable solution to it. The supervisory level deploys attention based on per-task value estimates, which incorporate beliefs about risk. Model simulations are compared against human data collected in a driving simulator. Results Human data show adaptation to the attentional demands of ongoing tasks, as measured in lane deviation and in-car gaze deployment. The predictions of our model fit the human data on these metrics. Conclusion Multitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility. Safe and unsafe behaviors emerge as the driver has to arbitrate between conflicting goals and manage uncertainty about them. Application Simulations can inform studies of conditions that are likely to give rise to unsafe driving behavior.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention task</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multitasking</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnR6PjYuzJN3LipciktdKOZ-E40s3HWhAId0Q4dgZr472UyvhMXPJLz3cO5XIT2AR8DMHaCMXBGMCe4JqzibA2NoKQs58BhHY2Wcr7Ut9B2CE8Y46ouyk20VRBWAKuKETq7H7poowzP1s0y67ILb1-XVxmyySLaueyysZaLKKPtXTZ12vi0K-OjtC6-7aKNVnbB7H2cO2h6dflwfpPfTa5vz8d3uaIViblkSqdVU94yqRvCC6JVA6BUCgWtwlQbKKEmFWnrqi2hkrjhDdaguGbaFDvodOW7GJq50cq46GUnFj4l9G-il1b8Vpx9FLP-VfCyLgrAyeDow8D3L4MJUcxtUKbrpDP9EAShpGacpo9J6OEf9KkfvEvtCVLWjFFaUkgUXlHK9yF4036FASyW0xF_p5NKDn428VXwOY4E5CsgyJn5fvVfw3fAvJdy</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Jokinen, Jussi P. P.</creator><creator>Kujala, Tuomo</creator><creator>Oulasvirta, Antti</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8222-8540</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-2209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty</title><author>Jokinen, Jussi P. P. ; Kujala, Tuomo ; Oulasvirta, Antti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention task</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multitasking</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jokinen, Jussi P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujala, Tuomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulasvirta, Antti</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jokinen, Jussi P. P.</au><au>Kujala, Tuomo</au><au>Oulasvirta, Antti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1324</spage><epage>1341</epage><pages>1324-1341</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective was to better understand how people adapt multitasking behavior when circumstances in driving change and how safe versus unsafe behaviors emerge. Background Multitasking strategies in driving adapt to changes in the task environment, but the cognitive mechanisms of this adaptation are not well known. Missing is a unifying account to explain the joint contribution of task constraints, goals, cognitive capabilities, and beliefs about the driving environment. Method We model the driver’s decision to deploy visual attention as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem and propose hierarchical reinforcement learning as a computationally tractable solution to it. The supervisory level deploys attention based on per-task value estimates, which incorporate beliefs about risk. Model simulations are compared against human data collected in a driving simulator. Results Human data show adaptation to the attentional demands of ongoing tasks, as measured in lane deviation and in-car gaze deployment. The predictions of our model fit the human data on these metrics. Conclusion Multitasking strategies can be understood as optimal adaptation under uncertainty, wherein the driver adapts to cognitive constraints and the task environment’s uncertainties, aiming to maximize the expected long-term utility. Safe and unsafe behaviors emerge as the driver has to arbitrate between conflicting goals and manage uncertainty about them. Application Simulations can inform studies of conditions that are likely to give rise to unsafe driving behavior.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32731763</pmid><doi>10.1177/0018720820927687</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8222-8540</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-2209</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 2021-12, Vol.63 (8), p.1324-1341
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8593310
source SAGE
subjects Adaptation
Arbitration
Attention
Attention task
Automobile Driving
Behavior
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Decision making
Humans
Multitasking
Simulation
Uncertainty
Visual perception
title Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A54%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multitasking%20in%20Driving%20as%20Optimal%20Adaptation%20Under%20Uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Jokinen,%20Jussi%20P.%20P.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1324&rft.epage=1341&rft.pages=1324-1341&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0018720820927687&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2429784273%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a7cda7c948f7adb2832dcb11cc0001fc04de1519262f96f516a0b8b0d1c8d7de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597744541&rft_id=info:pmid/32731763&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0018720820927687&rfr_iscdi=true