Clinical management of alveolar osteitis. A systematic review

• Published in: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2021-11, Vol.26 (6), p.e691-e702
• Main Authors: Garola, F., Gilligan, G., Panico, R., Leonardi, N., Piemonte, E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry; Review
• ISSN: 1698-6946; 1698-4447; 1698-6946
• DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24256

BACKGROUNDAlveolar Osteitis (AO) is one of the most common complications of tooth extraction. Several therapeutic interventions have been described for the treatment of AO, however, there are no treatment standardized protocols. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the efficacy in pain control of the different treatments for AO. The feasibility of the application of these interventions is also discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODSA structured electronic and hand search strategy was applied to PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar between January 2010 and July 2020 to identify studies according to PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were original English and Spanish clinical trials that analyzed pain-control parameters according to visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10 scale), or pain relief patients' percentages. Those treatments that reach VAS ≤ 4 on day 2 or before; or ≥ 85% of patients with absence of pain symptoms at day 7 or before were considered acceptable for their recommendation. RESULTSThe final review included 17 clinical trials. Among them, there were analyzed a total of 39 different AO treatments. 53,8% of the treatments fulfill the proposed parameters for pain control. CONCLUSIONSTreatment alternatives are multiple, heterogeneous, and difficult to compare. The management of AO is summarized in basic (intra-alveolar irrigation) and specific procedures (Alveogyl®, Neocones®, SaliCept Patch®, Low-Level Laser, Platelet-Rich Fibrin) that reach pain control success. They could be selected according to their availability and advantages or disadvantages.