Diagnostic Value of Single-Photon Emission Tomography Stress Test in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease in Saudi Arabia

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2021-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e19071-e19071
• Main Authors: Alqarni, Mohammed S, Bukhari, Ziad M, Abukhodair, Abdulkarim W, Binammar, Dina Y, Alzahrani, Atif, Alkahtani, Abdulkareem, Albugami, Saad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agreements; Angina pectoris; Body mass index; Cardiac stress tests; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Coronary vessels; Demographics; Diabetes; Females; Heart attacks; High density lipoprotein; Hypertension; Laboratories; Lipoproteins; Medical diagnosis; Medical imaging; Mortality; Nuclear Medicine; Patients; Population; Tomography; Vein & artery diseases
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19071

BackgroundInvasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard procedure for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). ICA allows for clear visualization of the coronary arterial blood flow. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is currently in widespread use to non-invasively evaluate patients known or suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to examine the association between (SPECT) stress test and elective ICA in terms of diagnostic value in patients suspected of coronary artery disease at the King Faisal Cardiac Center (KFCC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.MethodsThis study is a retrospective diagnostic validation study using a consecutive sampling technique to select the study sample at KFCC. The study included all patients who presented with chest pain that were investigated with either exercise or pharmacologic myocardial perfusion SPECT study followed by elective ICA within six months from January 2015 to January 2020.ResultsA total of 207 patients met the inclusion criteria, where 43% (n = 90) of patients were females and 57% (n = 117) were males; 68% (n = 141) of the patients had both test results concordant (both SPECT and ICA results were in agreement). In 32% of the patients (n = 66), there was a discordant result (discrepant result between SPECT and ICA). SPECT had a sensitivity of 92.4% and a specificity of 26.3%. SPECT had a negative predictive value of 0.68 and a positive predictive value of 0.66 compared to ICA. There was a low degree of reliability between SPECT and ICA.ConclusionReliability between the SPECT and ICA in exclusion of significant CAD is high. The rate of false-positive tests was high while the accuracy of SPECT in detecting CAD in patients with diabetes and hypertension was high. The overall reliability of SPECT to ICA in the Saudi population was low.