Loading…
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were predicted to have a major impact on mental health; however, studies on this issue present contradictory findings. Mental ill-health indicators have exhibited strong upward trends over the past decade, but recent studies exploring psychotropic medic...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S2-S2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-5ed5602ec94723b2128cbf5d252c97626cb9f136e4daf50bdf4605429794195d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | S2 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S2 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 398 |
creator | Kent, Lisa O'Reilly, Dermot Maguire, Aideen |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were predicted to have a major impact on mental health; however, studies on this issue present contradictory findings. Mental ill-health indicators have exhibited strong upward trends over the past decade, but recent studies exploring psychotropic medication uptake have relied on simple counts in the year before and after lockdown, which can give a false impression of the scale of the pandemic's effect. This study uses 9 years of linked, individual-level, administrative data to identify changes in psychotropic medication uptake before and after the pandemic.
Psychotropic and antiepileptic (counterfactual comparator) medication data were extracted from the population-wide Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), which captures all medications dispensed in community pharmacies across Northern Ireland. Prescriptions remain free in Northern Ireland; therefore, EPD captures more than 99% of medications dispensed, but monthly scan rates can be lower. Individual-level demographic and socioeconomic indicators were obtained from general practitioner registration data for everyone aged older than 10 years (approximately 1·5 million). Denominators varied monthly, including all individuals alive and resident that month. Monthly prescription counts were split (prelockdown Jan 1, 2012 to Feb 29, 2020; post lockdown March 1 to Oct 31, 2020). Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average models were trained in R, version 4.1.0, taking into consideration trends and seasonal effects. The forecast (expected) monthly values were compared to actual monthly values, stratified by demographic factors.
Over the study period, approximately 31·4% (n=566 594) of the study population had received antidepressant, 13·6% (n=244 515) hypnotic, 3·6% (n=65 565) antipsychotic, 17·4% (n=312 849) anxiolytic, and 9·3% (n=167 518) antiepileptic medications at some point, with strong upward trends for all medications 2012–20. In March, 2020, when restrictions began, all medication uptake increased beyond the CIs of the expected value, followed by a decrease April–May, 2020, mostly returning to the expected trend thereafter. Uptake of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics remained as expected when stratified by gender, age, single-person household, deprivation, and urbanicity. Significant increases were observed in uptake of hypnotics in people younger than 18 years and older than 65 years, and in anxiolytics for people older than 65 years.
Our |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02545-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8617338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673621025459</els_id><sourcerecordid>2602583879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-5ed5602ec94723b2128cbf5d252c97626cb9f136e4daf50bdf4605429794195d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKOfYELiRhelQPEoXGhM--pk4ix8xB2hgLIZqwGBmkn_vXT3ZBJXrm7uveec-zgAPMXoJUaYv_qKMEUdFz1_TvALRBhlnbwHVpgK2jEqft4HqzvIGXhUyhVCiHLEHoKznhIiJMMrcLPZJW0qjBOsWwfXlz827zssYdLBup03MAaYyt5sY80xtXznrDe6-lZfUtW_HfQBfom5sXOAm-zmxnwNNUwxLfMR2N1462DNLliog573xZfH4MGk5-Ke3MZz8P3jh2_rz93F5afN-t1FZ8hAZcecZRwRZyQVpB8JJoMZJ2YJI0YKTrgZ5YR77qjVE0OjnQ4XUiKFpFgy25-DNyfdtIxtdeNCzXpWKfudznsVtVf_doLfql_xWg0ci74fmsCzW4Ec_yyuVHUVl9yuKIq0zdjQD0I2FDuhTI6lZDfdTcBIHfxSR7_UwQxFsDr6pQ68tyeeaz-49i6rYrwLpj05O1OVjf4_Cn8BxAKcPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602583879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Kent, Lisa ; O'Reilly, Dermot ; Maguire, Aideen</creator><creatorcontrib>Kent, Lisa ; O'Reilly, Dermot ; Maguire, Aideen</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were predicted to have a major impact on mental health; however, studies on this issue present contradictory findings. Mental ill-health indicators have exhibited strong upward trends over the past decade, but recent studies exploring psychotropic medication uptake have relied on simple counts in the year before and after lockdown, which can give a false impression of the scale of the pandemic's effect. This study uses 9 years of linked, individual-level, administrative data to identify changes in psychotropic medication uptake before and after the pandemic.
Psychotropic and antiepileptic (counterfactual comparator) medication data were extracted from the population-wide Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), which captures all medications dispensed in community pharmacies across Northern Ireland. Prescriptions remain free in Northern Ireland; therefore, EPD captures more than 99% of medications dispensed, but monthly scan rates can be lower. Individual-level demographic and socioeconomic indicators were obtained from general practitioner registration data for everyone aged older than 10 years (approximately 1·5 million). Denominators varied monthly, including all individuals alive and resident that month. Monthly prescription counts were split (prelockdown Jan 1, 2012 to Feb 29, 2020; post lockdown March 1 to Oct 31, 2020). Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average models were trained in R, version 4.1.0, taking into consideration trends and seasonal effects. The forecast (expected) monthly values were compared to actual monthly values, stratified by demographic factors.
Over the study period, approximately 31·4% (n=566 594) of the study population had received antidepressant, 13·6% (n=244 515) hypnotic, 3·6% (n=65 565) antipsychotic, 17·4% (n=312 849) anxiolytic, and 9·3% (n=167 518) antiepileptic medications at some point, with strong upward trends for all medications 2012–20. In March, 2020, when restrictions began, all medication uptake increased beyond the CIs of the expected value, followed by a decrease April–May, 2020, mostly returning to the expected trend thereafter. Uptake of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics remained as expected when stratified by gender, age, single-person household, deprivation, and urbanicity. Significant increases were observed in uptake of hypnotics in people younger than 18 years and older than 65 years, and in anxiolytics for people older than 65 years.
Our results suggest stockpiling of medications in March, 2020, with lockdown associated with increased hypnotics in children, and hypnotics and anxiolytics in older people. There remains no evidence of restrictions impacting antidepressant or antipsychotic uptake.
UK Research and Innovation Administrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (grant number ES/S00744X/1) and the Northern Ireland Public Health Agency Health and Social Care Research and Development (grant number COM/5625/20).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02545-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34227951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antidepressants ; Antipsychotics ; Anxiolytics ; COVID-19 ; Demographics ; Deprivation ; Drugs ; Hypnotics ; Indicators ; Meeting Abstracts ; Mental health ; Older people ; Pandemics ; Population studies ; Psychotropic drugs ; Public health ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research facilities ; Trend analysis ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S2-S2</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-5ed5602ec94723b2128cbf5d252c97626cb9f136e4daf50bdf4605429794195d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kent, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Dermot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Aideen</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were predicted to have a major impact on mental health; however, studies on this issue present contradictory findings. Mental ill-health indicators have exhibited strong upward trends over the past decade, but recent studies exploring psychotropic medication uptake have relied on simple counts in the year before and after lockdown, which can give a false impression of the scale of the pandemic's effect. This study uses 9 years of linked, individual-level, administrative data to identify changes in psychotropic medication uptake before and after the pandemic.
Psychotropic and antiepileptic (counterfactual comparator) medication data were extracted from the population-wide Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), which captures all medications dispensed in community pharmacies across Northern Ireland. Prescriptions remain free in Northern Ireland; therefore, EPD captures more than 99% of medications dispensed, but monthly scan rates can be lower. Individual-level demographic and socioeconomic indicators were obtained from general practitioner registration data for everyone aged older than 10 years (approximately 1·5 million). Denominators varied monthly, including all individuals alive and resident that month. Monthly prescription counts were split (prelockdown Jan 1, 2012 to Feb 29, 2020; post lockdown March 1 to Oct 31, 2020). Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average models were trained in R, version 4.1.0, taking into consideration trends and seasonal effects. The forecast (expected) monthly values were compared to actual monthly values, stratified by demographic factors.
Over the study period, approximately 31·4% (n=566 594) of the study population had received antidepressant, 13·6% (n=244 515) hypnotic, 3·6% (n=65 565) antipsychotic, 17·4% (n=312 849) anxiolytic, and 9·3% (n=167 518) antiepileptic medications at some point, with strong upward trends for all medications 2012–20. In March, 2020, when restrictions began, all medication uptake increased beyond the CIs of the expected value, followed by a decrease April–May, 2020, mostly returning to the expected trend thereafter. Uptake of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics remained as expected when stratified by gender, age, single-person household, deprivation, and urbanicity. Significant increases were observed in uptake of hypnotics in people younger than 18 years and older than 65 years, and in anxiolytics for people older than 65 years.
Our results suggest stockpiling of medications in March, 2020, with lockdown associated with increased hypnotics in children, and hypnotics and anxiolytics in older people. There remains no evidence of restrictions impacting antidepressant or antipsychotic uptake.
UK Research and Innovation Administrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (grant number ES/S00744X/1) and the Northern Ireland Public Health Agency Health and Social Care Research and Development (grant number COM/5625/20).</description><subject>Antidepressants</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Anxiolytics</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Hypnotics</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Meeting Abstracts</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Trend analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKOfYELiRhelQPEoXGhM--pk4ix8xB2hgLIZqwGBmkn_vXT3ZBJXrm7uveec-zgAPMXoJUaYv_qKMEUdFz1_TvALRBhlnbwHVpgK2jEqft4HqzvIGXhUyhVCiHLEHoKznhIiJMMrcLPZJW0qjBOsWwfXlz827zssYdLBup03MAaYyt5sY80xtXznrDe6-lZfUtW_HfQBfom5sXOAm-zmxnwNNUwxLfMR2N1462DNLliog573xZfH4MGk5-Ke3MZz8P3jh2_rz93F5afN-t1FZ8hAZcecZRwRZyQVpB8JJoMZJ2YJI0YKTrgZ5YR77qjVE0OjnQ4XUiKFpFgy25-DNyfdtIxtdeNCzXpWKfudznsVtVf_doLfql_xWg0ci74fmsCzW4Ec_yyuVHUVl9yuKIq0zdjQD0I2FDuhTI6lZDfdTcBIHfxSR7_UwQxFsDr6pQ68tyeeaz-49i6rYrwLpj05O1OVjf4_Cn8BxAKcPQ</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Kent, Lisa</creator><creator>O'Reilly, Dermot</creator><creator>Maguire, Aideen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis</title><author>Kent, Lisa ; O'Reilly, Dermot ; Maguire, Aideen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-5ed5602ec94723b2128cbf5d252c97626cb9f136e4daf50bdf4605429794195d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antidepressants</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Anxiolytics</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Hypnotics</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Meeting Abstracts</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Trend analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kent, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Dermot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Aideen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kent, Lisa</au><au>O'Reilly, Dermot</au><au>Maguire, Aideen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>398</volume><spage>S2</spage><epage>S2</epage><pages>S2-S2</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were predicted to have a major impact on mental health; however, studies on this issue present contradictory findings. Mental ill-health indicators have exhibited strong upward trends over the past decade, but recent studies exploring psychotropic medication uptake have relied on simple counts in the year before and after lockdown, which can give a false impression of the scale of the pandemic's effect. This study uses 9 years of linked, individual-level, administrative data to identify changes in psychotropic medication uptake before and after the pandemic.
Psychotropic and antiepileptic (counterfactual comparator) medication data were extracted from the population-wide Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD), which captures all medications dispensed in community pharmacies across Northern Ireland. Prescriptions remain free in Northern Ireland; therefore, EPD captures more than 99% of medications dispensed, but monthly scan rates can be lower. Individual-level demographic and socioeconomic indicators were obtained from general practitioner registration data for everyone aged older than 10 years (approximately 1·5 million). Denominators varied monthly, including all individuals alive and resident that month. Monthly prescription counts were split (prelockdown Jan 1, 2012 to Feb 29, 2020; post lockdown March 1 to Oct 31, 2020). Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average models were trained in R, version 4.1.0, taking into consideration trends and seasonal effects. The forecast (expected) monthly values were compared to actual monthly values, stratified by demographic factors.
Over the study period, approximately 31·4% (n=566 594) of the study population had received antidepressant, 13·6% (n=244 515) hypnotic, 3·6% (n=65 565) antipsychotic, 17·4% (n=312 849) anxiolytic, and 9·3% (n=167 518) antiepileptic medications at some point, with strong upward trends for all medications 2012–20. In March, 2020, when restrictions began, all medication uptake increased beyond the CIs of the expected value, followed by a decrease April–May, 2020, mostly returning to the expected trend thereafter. Uptake of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics remained as expected when stratified by gender, age, single-person household, deprivation, and urbanicity. Significant increases were observed in uptake of hypnotics in people younger than 18 years and older than 65 years, and in anxiolytics for people older than 65 years.
Our results suggest stockpiling of medications in March, 2020, with lockdown associated with increased hypnotics in children, and hypnotics and anxiolytics in older people. There remains no evidence of restrictions impacting antidepressant or antipsychotic uptake.
UK Research and Innovation Administrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (grant number ES/S00744X/1) and the Northern Ireland Public Health Agency Health and Social Care Research and Development (grant number COM/5625/20).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34227951</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02545-9</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2021-11, Vol.398, p.S2-S2 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8617338 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Antidepressants Antipsychotics Anxiolytics COVID-19 Demographics Deprivation Drugs Hypnotics Indicators Meeting Abstracts Mental health Older people Pandemics Population studies Psychotropic drugs Public health R&D Research & development Research facilities Trend analysis Trends |
title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychotropic medication uptake in Northern Ireland: a population-wide trend analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T03%3A01%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20on%20psychotropic%20medication%20uptake%20in%20Northern%20Ireland:%20a%20population-wide%20trend%20analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Kent,%20Lisa&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=398&rft.spage=S2&rft.epage=S2&rft.pages=S2-S2&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02545-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2602583879%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-5ed5602ec94723b2128cbf5d252c97626cb9f136e4daf50bdf4605429794195d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602583879&rft_id=info:pmid/34227951&rfr_iscdi=true |