Loading…

Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic

In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical education 2021-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1923-1929
Main Authors: Asadourian, Paul A., Murphy, Alexander I., Marano, Andrew A., Rohde, Christine H., Wu, June K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3
container_end_page 1929
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1923
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 78
creator Asadourian, Paul A.
Murphy, Alexander I.
Marano, Andrew A.
Rohde, Christine H.
Wu, June K.
description In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. Columbia University (New York). For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p > 0.05 for all). During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8635498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720421001562</els_id><sourcerecordid>2548410581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIfcAXcPGRS7LtR15III0G9iEt2hUsXC3H7mQ8SuLBTkaav8e7syBx4dStrq7qVhUh7xjkDFh5sc23cQl9zoGzHMocgL8gp6yu6qySBX-Z-kawrOIgT8hZjFuAQja8eU1OhOQMSlmcksO1H5FeOhwsXdm9nmbd4we6ihFjdFNP5w3SK_R90LuNM_Qh4GQj9d0TcD_oOKfp9_QHhgP9htFZnMyBftWz2VC7hD8a67ufN58z1tB7PVkcnXlDXnV6iPj2uZ6TH5dfHtbX2e3d1c16dZsZKco5M1BaViDjXFey6ywIbRFbCbzpWKnbBlOVTVdB29aoq1bUzEpsNEeQVlhxTj4ddXdLO6I1OM1BD2oX3KjDQXnt1L_I5Daq93tVlyL5VSeB988Cwf9aMM5qdNHgMOgJ_RIVL2QtGRQ1S6viuGqCjzFg9_cMA_UYmtqqp9DUY2gKSpVCS6yPRxYmG_YOg4rGJRfRuoBmVta7__J_Azhsoas</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548410581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Asadourian, Paul A. ; Murphy, Alexander I. ; Marano, Andrew A. ; Rohde, Christine H. ; Wu, June K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asadourian, Paul A. ; Murphy, Alexander I. ; Marano, Andrew A. ; Rohde, Christine H. ; Wu, June K.</creatorcontrib><description>In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. Columbia University (New York). For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p &gt; 0.05 for all). During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34210645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Geography ; Integrated Plastic Surgery Match ; Original Reports</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2021-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1923-1929</ispartof><rights>2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7104-3911 ; 0000-0003-3866-960X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asadourian, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Alexander I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marano, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Christine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, June K.</creatorcontrib><title>Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><description>In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. Columbia University (New York). For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p &gt; 0.05 for all). During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Integrated Plastic Surgery Match</subject><subject>Original Reports</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIfcAXcPGRS7LtR15III0G9iEt2hUsXC3H7mQ8SuLBTkaav8e7syBx4dStrq7qVhUh7xjkDFh5sc23cQl9zoGzHMocgL8gp6yu6qySBX-Z-kawrOIgT8hZjFuAQja8eU1OhOQMSlmcksO1H5FeOhwsXdm9nmbd4we6ihFjdFNP5w3SK_R90LuNM_Qh4GQj9d0TcD_oOKfp9_QHhgP9htFZnMyBftWz2VC7hD8a67ufN58z1tB7PVkcnXlDXnV6iPj2uZ6TH5dfHtbX2e3d1c16dZsZKco5M1BaViDjXFey6ywIbRFbCbzpWKnbBlOVTVdB29aoq1bUzEpsNEeQVlhxTj4ddXdLO6I1OM1BD2oX3KjDQXnt1L_I5Daq93tVlyL5VSeB988Cwf9aMM5qdNHgMOgJ_RIVL2QtGRQ1S6viuGqCjzFg9_cMA_UYmtqqp9DUY2gKSpVCS6yPRxYmG_YOg4rGJRfRuoBmVta7__J_Azhsoas</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Asadourian, Paul A.</creator><creator>Murphy, Alexander I.</creator><creator>Marano, Andrew A.</creator><creator>Rohde, Christine H.</creator><creator>Wu, June K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-3911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-960X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic</title><author>Asadourian, Paul A. ; Murphy, Alexander I. ; Marano, Andrew A. ; Rohde, Christine H. ; Wu, June K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Integrated Plastic Surgery Match</topic><topic>Original Reports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asadourian, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Alexander I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marano, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Christine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, June K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asadourian, Paul A.</au><au>Murphy, Alexander I.</au><au>Marano, Andrew A.</au><au>Rohde, Christine H.</au><au>Wu, June K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1923</spage><epage>1929</epage><pages>1923-1929</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>In previous plastic surgery residency match cycles, in-person activities at other institutions, such as away rotations, have facilitated matches outside of an applicant's home program or region. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, limited these in-person opportunities. Therefore, we hypothesized that applicants of the 2021 cycle would be more likely to match into programs with which they have existing geographic connections when compared to previous years. Residency websites and social media accounts were searched for resident names and educational information for those matching in 2021 and 2015 to 2020. Outcomes included proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school (“home program”), or matching in the same state or United States Census Map region as their medical school or undergraduate institution. Subgroup analyses were stratified by program region, incoming resident class size, and Doximity residency reputation ranking. Columbia University (New York). For the 2015 to 2020 residency cycles, 963 residents were identified from 78 (95.1%) programs. For 2021, 159 incoming interns were identified from 70 (82.3%) programs. 2021 applicants matched into their home program at higher rates than 2015-2020 applicants (36.0% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.019). This trend was similar regardless of program region or size. This increase was significant for programs ranked outside of the top 30 (41.5% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.032), but not for the top 30 programs (32.1% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.128). Excluding those who matched at their home program, 2015 to 2020 and 2021 applicants matched in the same state or region of their medical school or undergraduate institution at similar rates (p &gt; 0.05 for all). During the COVID-19 pandemic, plastic surgery residency programs matched more applicants from affiliated medical schools than in previous years. This may result from lack of in-person opportunities for applicants at other programs. Alternative relationship-building opportunities may facilitate broader geographic connections in the 2022 cycle.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34210645</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-3911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-960X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2021-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1923-1929
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8635498
source Elsevier
subjects COVID-19
Geography
Integrated Plastic Surgery Match
Original Reports
title Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A29%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home%20Field%20Advantage:%20Assessing%20the%20Geographic%20Trends%20of%20the%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Residency%20Match%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Asadourian,%20Paul%20A.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1923&rft.epage=1929&rft.pages=1923-1929&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2548410581%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-c06d15e122a74ffd03adeeb4029f16ab9e9f149f70bb8ea7b381d4e9a2e04d3d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548410581&rft_id=info:pmid/34210645&rfr_iscdi=true