Loading…

Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running

Three foot-strike techniques are common in runners. If these techniques generate different sounds at the point of impact with the ground, lower limb kinetics may be influenced. No previous authors have determined whether such relationships exist. To determine foot-ground impact sound characteristics...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of athletic training 2021-12, Vol.56 (12), p.1362-1366
Main Authors: Hung Au, Ivan Pui, Ng, Leo, Davey, Paul, So, Marco, Chan, Brian, Li, Pinky, Wong, Will, Althorpe, Tania, Stearne, Sarah Michelle, Cheung, Roy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3
container_end_page 1366
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1362
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume 56
creator Hung Au, Ivan Pui
Ng, Leo
Davey, Paul
So, Marco
Chan, Brian
Li, Pinky
Wong, Will
Althorpe, Tania
Stearne, Sarah Michelle
Cheung, Roy
description Three foot-strike techniques are common in runners. If these techniques generate different sounds at the point of impact with the ground, lower limb kinetics may be influenced. No previous authors have determined whether such relationships exist. To determine foot-ground impact sound characteristics and compare the impact-sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques and the relationships between impact-sound characteristics and vertical loading rates. Cross-sectional study. Gait analysis laboratory. A total of 30 runners (15 women, 15 men; age = 23.5 ± 4.0 years, height = 1.67 ± 0.1 m, mass = 58.1 ± 8.2 kg) completed overground running trials with rearfoot-strike, midfoot-strike (MFS), and forefoot-strike (FFS) techniques in a gait analysis laboratory. Impact sound was measured using a shotgun microphone, and the peak sound amplitude, median frequency, and sound duration were analyzed. Separate linear regressions, clustering participants due to repeated measures, were used to compare the sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques. Kinetic data were collected from a force plate, and the vertical loading rates were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between sound characteristics and kinetics. Landing with an MFS or FFS resulted in greater peak sound amplitude (P < .001) and shorter sound duration (P < .001) than a rearfoot strike. The MFS exhibited the highest median frequency among the 3 foot-strike patterns, followed by the FFS (P < .001). We did not find a significant relationship between vertical loading rates and any impact sound characteristics (P > .115). The results suggest that impact-sound characteristics may be used to differentiate foot-strike patterns in runners. However, these did not relate to lower limb kinetics. Therefore, clinicians should not solely rely on impact sound to infer impact loading.
doi_str_mv 10.4085/1062-6050-0708.20
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8675315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610281093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUd9LwzAQDqI4nf4BvkjBFx_svEuatH0RhjodKIKb4FtI23RW22amreB_b7rpUJ9yue8Hd_cRcoQwCiDi5wiC-gI4-BBCNKKwRfYwZpGPgj5vu_oHH5D9pnkFQMpjsUsGLIgRIRR7ZD6tliptvZnp6swbp9Y0jfeolc2Nac-8-yJbF8qhE2N1__NmrS3etHfV2aJeeA8f2i7sSv_Y1bVrHZCdXJWNPvx-h-Rpcj2_vPXvHm6ml-M7Pw1o2PqBiAItMGM04yrIE8YhUYnI3ZgJIqeQZxGLspjlsVAhapanQlCOAYaZ1kHKhuRi7bvskkpnqa5bq0q5tEWl7Kc0qpB_kbp4kQvzISMRcobcGZx-G1jz3ummlVXRpLosVa1N10gqEGIQTISOevKP-mo6W7v1ViwaOSZzLFyzVod059oMgyD7zGSfiewzkX1mkoLTHP_eYqP4CYl9AfcJkW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610281093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><creator>Hung Au, Ivan Pui ; Ng, Leo ; Davey, Paul ; So, Marco ; Chan, Brian ; Li, Pinky ; Wong, Will ; Althorpe, Tania ; Stearne, Sarah Michelle ; Cheung, Roy</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung Au, Ivan Pui ; Ng, Leo ; Davey, Paul ; So, Marco ; Chan, Brian ; Li, Pinky ; Wong, Will ; Althorpe, Tania ; Stearne, Sarah Michelle ; Cheung, Roy</creatorcontrib><description>Three foot-strike techniques are common in runners. If these techniques generate different sounds at the point of impact with the ground, lower limb kinetics may be influenced. No previous authors have determined whether such relationships exist. To determine foot-ground impact sound characteristics and compare the impact-sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques and the relationships between impact-sound characteristics and vertical loading rates. Cross-sectional study. Gait analysis laboratory. A total of 30 runners (15 women, 15 men; age = 23.5 ± 4.0 years, height = 1.67 ± 0.1 m, mass = 58.1 ± 8.2 kg) completed overground running trials with rearfoot-strike, midfoot-strike (MFS), and forefoot-strike (FFS) techniques in a gait analysis laboratory. Impact sound was measured using a shotgun microphone, and the peak sound amplitude, median frequency, and sound duration were analyzed. Separate linear regressions, clustering participants due to repeated measures, were used to compare the sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques. Kinetic data were collected from a force plate, and the vertical loading rates were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between sound characteristics and kinetics. Landing with an MFS or FFS resulted in greater peak sound amplitude (P &lt; .001) and shorter sound duration (P &lt; .001) than a rearfoot strike. The MFS exhibited the highest median frequency among the 3 foot-strike patterns, followed by the FFS (P &lt; .001). We did not find a significant relationship between vertical loading rates and any impact sound characteristics (P &gt; .115). The results suggest that impact-sound characteristics may be used to differentiate foot-strike patterns in runners. However, these did not relate to lower limb kinetics. Therefore, clinicians should not solely rely on impact sound to infer impact loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0708.20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34911076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Composition ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Ethics ; Female ; Foot ; Gait ; Humans ; Injuries ; Kinetics ; Laboratories ; Male ; Motion ; Running ; Running Medicine ; Software ; Sound ; Strikes ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2021-12, Vol.56 (12), p.1362-1366</ispartof><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Dec 2021</rights><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc 2021 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2610281093/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2610281093?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21376,21392,27922,27923,33609,33610,33875,33876,43731,43878,53789,53791,73991,74167</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung Au, Ivan Pui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pinky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althorpe, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearne, Sarah Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Roy</creatorcontrib><title>Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><description>Three foot-strike techniques are common in runners. If these techniques generate different sounds at the point of impact with the ground, lower limb kinetics may be influenced. No previous authors have determined whether such relationships exist. To determine foot-ground impact sound characteristics and compare the impact-sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques and the relationships between impact-sound characteristics and vertical loading rates. Cross-sectional study. Gait analysis laboratory. A total of 30 runners (15 women, 15 men; age = 23.5 ± 4.0 years, height = 1.67 ± 0.1 m, mass = 58.1 ± 8.2 kg) completed overground running trials with rearfoot-strike, midfoot-strike (MFS), and forefoot-strike (FFS) techniques in a gait analysis laboratory. Impact sound was measured using a shotgun microphone, and the peak sound amplitude, median frequency, and sound duration were analyzed. Separate linear regressions, clustering participants due to repeated measures, were used to compare the sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques. Kinetic data were collected from a force plate, and the vertical loading rates were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between sound characteristics and kinetics. Landing with an MFS or FFS resulted in greater peak sound amplitude (P &lt; .001) and shorter sound duration (P &lt; .001) than a rearfoot strike. The MFS exhibited the highest median frequency among the 3 foot-strike patterns, followed by the FFS (P &lt; .001). We did not find a significant relationship between vertical loading rates and any impact sound characteristics (P &gt; .115). The results suggest that impact-sound characteristics may be used to differentiate foot-strike patterns in runners. However, these did not relate to lower limb kinetics. Therefore, clinicians should not solely rely on impact sound to infer impact loading.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Running Medicine</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUd9LwzAQDqI4nf4BvkjBFx_svEuatH0RhjodKIKb4FtI23RW22amreB_b7rpUJ9yue8Hd_cRcoQwCiDi5wiC-gI4-BBCNKKwRfYwZpGPgj5vu_oHH5D9pnkFQMpjsUsGLIgRIRR7ZD6tliptvZnp6swbp9Y0jfeolc2Nac-8-yJbF8qhE2N1__NmrS3etHfV2aJeeA8f2i7sSv_Y1bVrHZCdXJWNPvx-h-Rpcj2_vPXvHm6ml-M7Pw1o2PqBiAItMGM04yrIE8YhUYnI3ZgJIqeQZxGLspjlsVAhapanQlCOAYaZ1kHKhuRi7bvskkpnqa5bq0q5tEWl7Kc0qpB_kbp4kQvzISMRcobcGZx-G1jz3ummlVXRpLosVa1N10gqEGIQTISOevKP-mo6W7v1ViwaOSZzLFyzVod059oMgyD7zGSfiewzkX1mkoLTHP_eYqP4CYl9AfcJkW4</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Hung Au, Ivan Pui</creator><creator>Ng, Leo</creator><creator>Davey, Paul</creator><creator>So, Marco</creator><creator>Chan, Brian</creator><creator>Li, Pinky</creator><creator>Wong, Will</creator><creator>Althorpe, Tania</creator><creator>Stearne, Sarah Michelle</creator><creator>Cheung, Roy</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running</title><author>Hung Au, Ivan Pui ; Ng, Leo ; Davey, Paul ; So, Marco ; Chan, Brian ; Li, Pinky ; Wong, Will ; Althorpe, Tania ; Stearne, Sarah Michelle ; Cheung, Roy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Running Medicine</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung Au, Ivan Pui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pinky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althorpe, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearne, Sarah Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Roy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung Au, Ivan Pui</au><au>Ng, Leo</au><au>Davey, Paul</au><au>So, Marco</au><au>Chan, Brian</au><au>Li, Pinky</au><au>Wong, Will</au><au>Althorpe, Tania</au><au>Stearne, Sarah Michelle</au><au>Cheung, Roy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1362</spage><epage>1366</epage><pages>1362-1366</pages><issn>1062-6050</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract>Three foot-strike techniques are common in runners. If these techniques generate different sounds at the point of impact with the ground, lower limb kinetics may be influenced. No previous authors have determined whether such relationships exist. To determine foot-ground impact sound characteristics and compare the impact-sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques and the relationships between impact-sound characteristics and vertical loading rates. Cross-sectional study. Gait analysis laboratory. A total of 30 runners (15 women, 15 men; age = 23.5 ± 4.0 years, height = 1.67 ± 0.1 m, mass = 58.1 ± 8.2 kg) completed overground running trials with rearfoot-strike, midfoot-strike (MFS), and forefoot-strike (FFS) techniques in a gait analysis laboratory. Impact sound was measured using a shotgun microphone, and the peak sound amplitude, median frequency, and sound duration were analyzed. Separate linear regressions, clustering participants due to repeated measures, were used to compare the sound characteristics across foot-strike techniques. Kinetic data were collected from a force plate, and the vertical loading rates were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between sound characteristics and kinetics. Landing with an MFS or FFS resulted in greater peak sound amplitude (P &lt; .001) and shorter sound duration (P &lt; .001) than a rearfoot strike. The MFS exhibited the highest median frequency among the 3 foot-strike patterns, followed by the FFS (P &lt; .001). We did not find a significant relationship between vertical loading rates and any impact sound characteristics (P &gt; .115). The results suggest that impact-sound characteristics may be used to differentiate foot-strike patterns in runners. However, these did not relate to lower limb kinetics. Therefore, clinicians should not solely rely on impact sound to infer impact loading.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><pmid>34911076</pmid><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-0708.20</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-6050
ispartof Journal of athletic training, 2021-12, Vol.56 (12), p.1362-1366
issn 1062-6050
1938-162X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8675315
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); SPORTDiscus
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Body Composition
Cross-Sectional Studies
Ethics
Female
Foot
Gait
Humans
Injuries
Kinetics
Laboratories
Male
Motion
Running
Running Medicine
Software
Sound
Strikes
Young Adult
title Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20Sound%20Across%20Rearfoot,%20Midfoot,%20and%20Forefoot%20Strike%20During%20Overground%20Running&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Hung%20Au,%20Ivan%20Pui&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1362&rft.epage=1366&rft.pages=1362-1366&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-0708.20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2610281093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-4684e61d32d5a4fb350bab6f012b11520fd838d93f96a71e3fc66251417dee4c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610281093&rft_id=info:pmid/34911076&rfr_iscdi=true