Opportunities and Limitations of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery

• Published in: Cancers 2021-12, Vol.13 (24), p.6162
• Main Authors: Lampe, Björn, Luengas-Würzinger, Verónica, Weitz, Jürgen, Roth, Stephan, Rawert, Friederike, Schuler, Esther, Classen-von Spee, Sabrina, Fix, Nando, Baransi, Saher, Dizdar, Anca, Mallmann, Peter, Schaser, Klaus-Dieter, Bogner, Andreas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bladder; Cancer therapies; Carcinoma; Cervix; Chemotherapy; Clinical trials; Disease; Gynecology; Laparoscopy; Literature reviews; Metastases; Metastasis; Morbidity; Mortality; Ostomy; Patients; Pelvis; Prostate; Quality of life; Rectum; Robotics; Sarcoma; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Surgical mesh; Surgical outcomes; Tumors; Uterus; Vagina
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246162

The practice of exenterative surgery is sometimes controversial and has garnered a certain scepticism. Surgical studies are difficult to conduct due to insufficient data. The aim of this review is to present the current standing of pelvic exenteration from a surgical, gynaecological and urological point of view. This review is based upon a literature review (MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL (Cochrane) and EMBASE (Elsevier)) of retrospective studies on exenterative surgery from 1993-2020. Using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) search terms, 1572 publications were found. These were evaluated and screened with respect to their eligibility using algorithms and well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Therefore, the guidelines for systematic reviews (PRISMA) were used. A complete tumour resection (R0) often represents the only curative option for advanced pelvic carcinomas and their recurrences. A recent systematic review showed significant symptom relief in 80% of palliative patients after pelvic exenteration. Surgical limitations (distant metastases, involvement of the pelvic wall, etc.) are diminished by adequate surgical expertise and close interdisciplinary cooperation. While the mortality rate is low (2-5%), the still relatively high morbidity rate (32-84%) can be minimized by optimizing the perioperative setting. Following exenterations, roughly 79-82% of patients report satisfying results according to PROs (patient-reported outcomes). Due to multimodality treatment strategies combined with extended surgical expertise and patients' preferences, pelvic exenteration can be offered nowadays with low mortality and acceptable postoperative quality of life. The possibilities of surgical treatment are often underestimated. A multi-centre database (PelvEx Collaborative) was established to collect data and experiences to optimize the research in this field.