Loading…
CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments
Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2021-06, Vol.133, p.104395-104395, Article 104395 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3 |
container_end_page | 104395 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104395 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Rezaei, Asghar Giambini, Hugo Miller II, Alan L. Xu, Hao Xu, Haocheng Li, Yong Yaszemski, Michael J. Lu, Lichun |
description | Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively assess vertebral fracture risk in metastatically-involved vertebral bodies. The aim of the current study was to develop an image-based computational technique to estimate fracture force outcomes during bending. To this end, mechanical testing was performed on intact, simulated defect, PMMA-augmented, and PPF-augmented 3-level spine segments from both sexes under a compression/flexion-type loading condition. The augmentation performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) were also evaluated and compared. Cylindrical defects were created in 3-level spine segments with attached posterior elements and ligaments. Using CT images of each segment, a rigidity analysis technique was developed and used for predicting fracture forces during bending. On average, PPF strengthened the segments by about 630 N, resulting in fracture forces similar to those observed in the intact and PMMA-augmented groups. Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. Rigidity analysis, along with age, explained 66% variability in experimental outcomes. This number increased to 74% when vertebral size and age were added to the rigidity analysis as explanatory variables. Both PPF and PMMA similarly increased fracture strength to the level of intact specimens. The results suggest that PPF can be a suitable candidate for augmentation purposes and rigidity analysis can be a promising predicting tool for vertebral fracture forces.
•Image-based rigidity analysis is a promising technique to predict fracture forces in augmented spine segments.•Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) can be a suitable candidate for augmenting metastatic vertebral bodies.•Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104395 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8750312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001048252100189X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2533270360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2P0zAUtBCILQt_AVninPIcO3HMAWmp-JJW4tK75TgvW1dJHGynqDd-Os52WeDEydK8mXnPM4RQBlsGrH573Fo_zq3zI3bbEkqWYcFV9YRsWCNVARUXT8kGgEEhmrK6Ii9iPAKAAA7PyRXnjSxVLTfk525ftCZiR2MKi01LMAM1kxnOESP1PT1hSNiuaB_MOs_wD5cOdPbDecTgLDXL3YhTMsn56R29yU5Ld1611nTmdE9Jh4BYDHjCgcbZTUgj3oviS_KsN0PEVw_vNdl_-rjffSluv33-uru5LayQIhVVXVspbNt3yLgQompaW5XKSKgUoEDVd4pJ0bBWgrWWYSut6nhpmDK1avk1eX-xnZc2h2bz6vwnPQc3mnDW3jj972RyB33nT7qRFXBWZoM3DwbBf18wJn30S8hBRV1WnJcSeA2Z1VxYNvgYA_aPGxjotTp91H-q02t1-lJdlr7--8JH4e-uMuHDhYA5ppPDoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_7f8AsJ1s5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533270360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Rezaei, Asghar ; Giambini, Hugo ; Miller II, Alan L. ; Xu, Hao ; Xu, Haocheng ; Li, Yong ; Yaszemski, Michael J. ; Lu, Lichun</creator><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Asghar ; Giambini, Hugo ; Miller II, Alan L. ; Xu, Hao ; Xu, Haocheng ; Li, Yong ; Yaszemski, Michael J. ; Lu, Lichun</creatorcontrib><description>Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively assess vertebral fracture risk in metastatically-involved vertebral bodies. The aim of the current study was to develop an image-based computational technique to estimate fracture force outcomes during bending. To this end, mechanical testing was performed on intact, simulated defect, PMMA-augmented, and PPF-augmented 3-level spine segments from both sexes under a compression/flexion-type loading condition. The augmentation performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) were also evaluated and compared. Cylindrical defects were created in 3-level spine segments with attached posterior elements and ligaments. Using CT images of each segment, a rigidity analysis technique was developed and used for predicting fracture forces during bending. On average, PPF strengthened the segments by about 630 N, resulting in fracture forces similar to those observed in the intact and PMMA-augmented groups. Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. Rigidity analysis, along with age, explained 66% variability in experimental outcomes. This number increased to 74% when vertebral size and age were added to the rigidity analysis as explanatory variables. Both PPF and PMMA similarly increased fracture strength to the level of intact specimens. The results suggest that PPF can be a suitable candidate for augmentation purposes and rigidity analysis can be a promising predicting tool for vertebral fracture forces.
•Image-based rigidity analysis is a promising technique to predict fracture forces in augmented spine segments.•Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) can be a suitable candidate for augmenting metastatic vertebral bodies.•Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104395</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33872967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Augmentation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics of spine ; Bone surgery ; Cadaver ; Cadavers ; Compression ; Computational neuroscience ; Computed tomography ; Defects ; Female ; Fracture strength ; Fractures ; Humans ; Male ; Mechanical properties ; Mechanical testing ; Mechanical tests ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Pain ; Polymers ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Polypropylene fumarate ; Rigidity ; Rigidity analysis ; Segments ; Software ; Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Spine ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vertebrae ; Vertebral augmentation ; Vertebral fracture ; Vertebroplasty</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-06, Vol.133, p.104395-104395, Article 104395</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33872967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Asghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giambini, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller II, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaszemski, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lichun</creatorcontrib><title>CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively assess vertebral fracture risk in metastatically-involved vertebral bodies. The aim of the current study was to develop an image-based computational technique to estimate fracture force outcomes during bending. To this end, mechanical testing was performed on intact, simulated defect, PMMA-augmented, and PPF-augmented 3-level spine segments from both sexes under a compression/flexion-type loading condition. The augmentation performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) were also evaluated and compared. Cylindrical defects were created in 3-level spine segments with attached posterior elements and ligaments. Using CT images of each segment, a rigidity analysis technique was developed and used for predicting fracture forces during bending. On average, PPF strengthened the segments by about 630 N, resulting in fracture forces similar to those observed in the intact and PMMA-augmented groups. Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. Rigidity analysis, along with age, explained 66% variability in experimental outcomes. This number increased to 74% when vertebral size and age were added to the rigidity analysis as explanatory variables. Both PPF and PMMA similarly increased fracture strength to the level of intact specimens. The results suggest that PPF can be a suitable candidate for augmentation purposes and rigidity analysis can be a promising predicting tool for vertebral fracture forces.
•Image-based rigidity analysis is a promising technique to predict fracture forces in augmented spine segments.•Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) can be a suitable candidate for augmenting metastatic vertebral bodies.•Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines.</description><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics of spine</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Cadavers</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Computational neuroscience</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture strength</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechanical testing</subject><subject>Mechanical tests</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Polypropylene fumarate</subject><subject>Rigidity</subject><subject>Rigidity analysis</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Vertebral augmentation</subject><subject>Vertebral fracture</subject><subject>Vertebroplasty</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU2P0zAUtBCILQt_AVninPIcO3HMAWmp-JJW4tK75TgvW1dJHGynqDd-Os52WeDEydK8mXnPM4RQBlsGrH573Fo_zq3zI3bbEkqWYcFV9YRsWCNVARUXT8kGgEEhmrK6Ii9iPAKAAA7PyRXnjSxVLTfk525ftCZiR2MKi01LMAM1kxnOESP1PT1hSNiuaB_MOs_wD5cOdPbDecTgLDXL3YhTMsn56R29yU5Ld1611nTmdE9Jh4BYDHjCgcbZTUgj3oviS_KsN0PEVw_vNdl_-rjffSluv33-uru5LayQIhVVXVspbNt3yLgQompaW5XKSKgUoEDVd4pJ0bBWgrWWYSut6nhpmDK1avk1eX-xnZc2h2bz6vwnPQc3mnDW3jj972RyB33nT7qRFXBWZoM3DwbBf18wJn30S8hBRV1WnJcSeA2Z1VxYNvgYA_aPGxjotTp91H-q02t1-lJdlr7--8JH4e-uMuHDhYA5ppPDoKN1OFnsXECbdOfd_7f8AsJ1s5I</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Rezaei, Asghar</creator><creator>Giambini, Hugo</creator><creator>Miller II, Alan L.</creator><creator>Xu, Hao</creator><creator>Xu, Haocheng</creator><creator>Li, Yong</creator><creator>Yaszemski, Michael J.</creator><creator>Lu, Lichun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments</title><author>Rezaei, Asghar ; Giambini, Hugo ; Miller II, Alan L. ; Xu, Hao ; Xu, Haocheng ; Li, Yong ; Yaszemski, Michael J. ; Lu, Lichun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics of spine</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Cadavers</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Computational neuroscience</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture strength</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechanical testing</topic><topic>Mechanical tests</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Polypropylene fumarate</topic><topic>Rigidity</topic><topic>Rigidity analysis</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Vertebral augmentation</topic><topic>Vertebral fracture</topic><topic>Vertebroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Asghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giambini, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller II, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaszemski, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Lichun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezaei, Asghar</au><au>Giambini, Hugo</au><au>Miller II, Alan L.</au><au>Xu, Hao</au><au>Xu, Haocheng</au><au>Li, Yong</au><au>Yaszemski, Michael J.</au><au>Lu, Lichun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>133</volume><spage>104395</spage><epage>104395</epage><pages>104395-104395</pages><artnum>104395</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>Pathologic vertebral fractures due to metastasis can occur under normal physiologic activities, leading to pain and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic vertebroplasty is a technique used to augment vertebral strength and reduce the risk of fracture. Currently, no technique is available to objectively assess vertebral fracture risk in metastatically-involved vertebral bodies. The aim of the current study was to develop an image-based computational technique to estimate fracture force outcomes during bending. To this end, mechanical testing was performed on intact, simulated defect, PMMA-augmented, and PPF-augmented 3-level spine segments from both sexes under a compression/flexion-type loading condition. The augmentation performance of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) were also evaluated and compared. Cylindrical defects were created in 3-level spine segments with attached posterior elements and ligaments. Using CT images of each segment, a rigidity analysis technique was developed and used for predicting fracture forces during bending. On average, PPF strengthened the segments by about 630 N, resulting in fracture forces similar to those observed in the intact and PMMA-augmented groups. Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines. Rigidity analysis, along with age, explained 66% variability in experimental outcomes. This number increased to 74% when vertebral size and age were added to the rigidity analysis as explanatory variables. Both PPF and PMMA similarly increased fracture strength to the level of intact specimens. The results suggest that PPF can be a suitable candidate for augmentation purposes and rigidity analysis can be a promising predicting tool for vertebral fracture forces.
•Image-based rigidity analysis is a promising technique to predict fracture forces in augmented spine segments.•Poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) can be a suitable candidate for augmenting metastatic vertebral bodies.•Female spines fractured at about 1150 N smaller force than did male spines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33872967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104395</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-06, Vol.133, p.104395-104395, Article 104395 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8750312 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Augmentation Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics of spine Bone surgery Cadaver Cadavers Compression Computational neuroscience Computed tomography Defects Female Fracture strength Fractures Humans Male Mechanical properties Mechanical testing Mechanical tests Metastases Metastasis Pain Polymers Polymethyl methacrylate Polymethylmethacrylate Polypropylene fumarate Rigidity Rigidity analysis Segments Software Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging Spine Tomography, X-Ray Computed Vertebrae Vertebral augmentation Vertebral fracture Vertebroplasty |
title | CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CT-based%20structural%20analyses%20of%20vertebral%20fractures%20with%20polymeric%20augmentation:%20A%20study%20of%20cadaveric%20three-level%20spine%20segments&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Rezaei,%20Asghar&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=133&rft.spage=104395&rft.epage=104395&rft.pages=104395-104395&rft.artnum=104395&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104395&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2533270360%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-566c74cbfde1344458bc529a70590e4e9fd917481b70ccc1eb7c9d32a19a69b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533270360&rft_id=info:pmid/33872967&rfr_iscdi=true |