Loading…

Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital

Background: Reliable vascular access is key to sustainable haemodialysis treatment. Guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred modality in preference to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). There are limited data on vascular access in subSaharan A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cardiovascular Journal of Africa 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.98-101
Main Authors: Grant, Ian R, Freercks, Robert J, Honiball, Eduard J, Dube, Bhekifa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 98
container_title Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
container_volume 32
creator Grant, Ian R
Freercks, Robert J
Honiball, Eduard J
Dube, Bhekifa
description Background: Reliable vascular access is key to sustainable haemodialysis treatment. Guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred modality in preference to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). There are limited data on vascular access in subSaharan Africa. This study aimed to evaluate the vascular access used in a South African tertiary hospital and identify problems with achieving the recommended access goals. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the haemodialysis programme at Livingstone Tertiary Hospital. Current and initial vascular access used, timing until the creation of permanent access, and any complications experienced were recorded. Results: CVCs were used in 56% of subjects, 38% were using an AVF and 5% were using an AVG. Only 12% of the group had no AVF attempt. The overwhelming majority (95%) had dialysis initiated with a CVC. The rate of pre-emptive AVF creation was low and a delay in AVF creation was seen in 63% of patients. Central venous stenosis or occlusion was present in 26% of patients and likely due to prior or current CVC use. Conclusions: The prevalence of CVC use was high and there were significant delays to AVF creation. High rates of central venous stenosis compromise future AVF use and are likely due to prolonged CVC use. Changes needed to improve the vascular access service include a multidisciplinary access clinic, dedicated theatre list, vascular access co-ordinator and further data collection to continually evaluate the vascular access service.
doi_str_mv 10.5830/CVJA-2020-049
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8756047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1-v32-n2-a7</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1-v32-n2-a7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p329t-152d9c115759c9162044a1b00c7259f4d7a6cc3695187d89ac60ac1ca1c069c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhYMobk4ffc8fqCZp0zQvwhjOKQNf1DcJd7fpmtGlpckK-_d2bC8-nQPnno_DJeSRsydZpOx58fMxTwQTLGGZviJTnhejVZm8Hr3WMuGFFhNyF8KOMSEKJW_JJE250orLKfmde2iOwQXaVjTWlg4Q8NBATwHRhkCD7QeHllZtTzuIzvo43npag923pbuUnadrNzi_DbH1lq7a0LkIzT25qaAJ9uGiM_K9fP1arJL159v7Yr5OulTomHApSo2cSyU1ap4LlmXAN4yhElJXWakgR0xzLXmhykID5gyQI3BkuUaVzsjLmdsdNntb4jiyh8Z0vdtDfzQtOPM_8a4223Yw4ztylp0AyzMgwMZ5G00AOzZMHWMXTF02pgZfNtacMs6kYMbu0CD0pWu5GVJhvDCg0j8qenxH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grant, Ian R ; Freercks, Robert J ; Honiball, Eduard J ; Dube, Bhekifa</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ian R ; Freercks, Robert J ; Honiball, Eduard J ; Dube, Bhekifa</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Reliable vascular access is key to sustainable haemodialysis treatment. Guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred modality in preference to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). There are limited data on vascular access in subSaharan Africa. This study aimed to evaluate the vascular access used in a South African tertiary hospital and identify problems with achieving the recommended access goals. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the haemodialysis programme at Livingstone Tertiary Hospital. Current and initial vascular access used, timing until the creation of permanent access, and any complications experienced were recorded. Results: CVCs were used in 56% of subjects, 38% were using an AVF and 5% were using an AVG. Only 12% of the group had no AVF attempt. The overwhelming majority (95%) had dialysis initiated with a CVC. The rate of pre-emptive AVF creation was low and a delay in AVF creation was seen in 63% of patients. Central venous stenosis or occlusion was present in 26% of patients and likely due to prior or current CVC use. Conclusions: The prevalence of CVC use was high and there were significant delays to AVF creation. High rates of central venous stenosis compromise future AVF use and are likely due to prolonged CVC use. Changes needed to improve the vascular access service include a multidisciplinary access clinic, dedicated theatre list, vascular access co-ordinator and further data collection to continually evaluate the vascular access service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1995-1892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1680-0745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33179715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Clinics Cardive Publishing</publisher><subject>Arteriovenous fistula ; arteriovenous graft ; Cardiovascular Topics ; haemodialysis access ; tunnelled central venous catheter</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.98-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Clinics Cardive Publishing 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756047/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756047/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freercks, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honiball, Eduard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dube, Bhekifa</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital</title><title>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</title><description>Background: Reliable vascular access is key to sustainable haemodialysis treatment. Guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred modality in preference to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). There are limited data on vascular access in subSaharan Africa. This study aimed to evaluate the vascular access used in a South African tertiary hospital and identify problems with achieving the recommended access goals. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the haemodialysis programme at Livingstone Tertiary Hospital. Current and initial vascular access used, timing until the creation of permanent access, and any complications experienced were recorded. Results: CVCs were used in 56% of subjects, 38% were using an AVF and 5% were using an AVG. Only 12% of the group had no AVF attempt. The overwhelming majority (95%) had dialysis initiated with a CVC. The rate of pre-emptive AVF creation was low and a delay in AVF creation was seen in 63% of patients. Central venous stenosis or occlusion was present in 26% of patients and likely due to prior or current CVC use. Conclusions: The prevalence of CVC use was high and there were significant delays to AVF creation. High rates of central venous stenosis compromise future AVF use and are likely due to prolonged CVC use. Changes needed to improve the vascular access service include a multidisciplinary access clinic, dedicated theatre list, vascular access co-ordinator and further data collection to continually evaluate the vascular access service.</description><subject>Arteriovenous fistula</subject><subject>arteriovenous graft</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Topics</subject><subject>haemodialysis access</subject><subject>tunnelled central venous catheter</subject><issn>1995-1892</issn><issn>1680-0745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkFFLwzAUhYMobk4ffc8fqCZp0zQvwhjOKQNf1DcJd7fpmtGlpckK-_d2bC8-nQPnno_DJeSRsydZpOx58fMxTwQTLGGZviJTnhejVZm8Hr3WMuGFFhNyF8KOMSEKJW_JJE250orLKfmde2iOwQXaVjTWlg4Q8NBATwHRhkCD7QeHllZtTzuIzvo43npag923pbuUnadrNzi_DbH1lq7a0LkIzT25qaAJ9uGiM_K9fP1arJL159v7Yr5OulTomHApSo2cSyU1ap4LlmXAN4yhElJXWakgR0xzLXmhykID5gyQI3BkuUaVzsjLmdsdNntb4jiyh8Z0vdtDfzQtOPM_8a4223Yw4ztylp0AyzMgwMZ5G00AOzZMHWMXTF02pgZfNtacMs6kYMbu0CD0pWu5GVJhvDCg0j8qenxH</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Grant, Ian R</creator><creator>Freercks, Robert J</creator><creator>Honiball, Eduard J</creator><creator>Dube, Bhekifa</creator><general>Clinics Cardive Publishing</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital</title><author>Grant, Ian R ; Freercks, Robert J ; Honiball, Eduard J ; Dube, Bhekifa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p329t-152d9c115759c9162044a1b00c7259f4d7a6cc3695187d89ac60ac1ca1c069c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arteriovenous fistula</topic><topic>arteriovenous graft</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Topics</topic><topic>haemodialysis access</topic><topic>tunnelled central venous catheter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freercks, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honiball, Eduard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dube, Bhekifa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Ian R</au><au>Freercks, Robert J</au><au>Honiball, Eduard J</au><au>Dube, Bhekifa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular Journal of Africa</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>98-101</pages><issn>1995-1892</issn><eissn>1680-0745</eissn><abstract>Background: Reliable vascular access is key to sustainable haemodialysis treatment. Guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred modality in preference to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). There are limited data on vascular access in subSaharan Africa. This study aimed to evaluate the vascular access used in a South African tertiary hospital and identify problems with achieving the recommended access goals. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of the haemodialysis programme at Livingstone Tertiary Hospital. Current and initial vascular access used, timing until the creation of permanent access, and any complications experienced were recorded. Results: CVCs were used in 56% of subjects, 38% were using an AVF and 5% were using an AVG. Only 12% of the group had no AVF attempt. The overwhelming majority (95%) had dialysis initiated with a CVC. The rate of pre-emptive AVF creation was low and a delay in AVF creation was seen in 63% of patients. Central venous stenosis or occlusion was present in 26% of patients and likely due to prior or current CVC use. Conclusions: The prevalence of CVC use was high and there were significant delays to AVF creation. High rates of central venous stenosis compromise future AVF use and are likely due to prolonged CVC use. Changes needed to improve the vascular access service include a multidisciplinary access clinic, dedicated theatre list, vascular access co-ordinator and further data collection to continually evaluate the vascular access service.</abstract><pub>Clinics Cardive Publishing</pub><pmid>33179715</pmid><doi>10.5830/CVJA-2020-049</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1995-1892
ispartof Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 2021-03, Vol.32 (2), p.98-101
issn 1995-1892
1680-0745
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8756047
source PubMed Central
subjects Arteriovenous fistula
arteriovenous graft
Cardiovascular Topics
haemodialysis access
tunnelled central venous catheter
title Analysis of the vascular access service for patients on haemodialysis in Livingstone Hospital
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20the%20vascular%20access%20service%20for%20patients%20on%20haemodialysis%20in%20Livingstone%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20Journal%20of%20Africa&rft.au=Grant,%20Ian%20R&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=98-101&rft.issn=1995-1892&rft.eissn=1680-0745&rft_id=info:doi/10.5830/CVJA-2020-049&rft_dat=%3Csabinet_pubme%3Ehttps://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1-v32-n2-a7%3C/sabinet_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p329t-152d9c115759c9162044a1b00c7259f4d7a6cc3695187d89ac60ac1ca1c069c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33179715&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cardio1-v32-n2-a7&rfr_iscdi=true