Loading…

Psychological distress associated with the COVID-19 lockdown: A two-wave network analysis

•Covid-related psychological distress network was evaluated during and after lockdown phase.•Network models provide insight into how distress symptoms may interact with each other.•Depression showed high centrality in both T1 and T2 networks.•Results revealed stability of distress symptom networks o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of affective disorders 2021-04, Vol.284, p.18-26
Main Authors: Di Blasi, Maria, Gullo, Salvatore, Mancinelli, Elisa, Freda, Maria Francesca, Esposito, Giovanna, Gelo, Omar Carlo Gioacchino, Lagetto, Gloria, Giordano, Cecilia, Mazzeschi, Claudia, Pazzagli, Chiara, Salcuni, Silvia, Lo Coco, Gianluca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Covid-related psychological distress network was evaluated during and after lockdown phase.•Network models provide insight into how distress symptoms may interact with each other.•Depression showed high centrality in both T1 and T2 networks.•Results revealed stability of distress symptom networks over time. Although preliminary research has evidenced negative psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic among the general population, little research has been carried out examining the interplay among the broader dimensions and correlates of individual distress. Via network analysis, the current study investigated the pathways that underlie some components of psychological distress and their changes over time (during and post COVID-19-related lockdown). 1,129 adult participants (79.1% women) completed a two-wave online survey during and after the lockdown, and reported on variables such as depression, anxiety, stress, fear of COVID, intolerance of uncertainty, emotion regulation and social support. The networks were estimated via Gaussian Graphical Models and their temporal changes were compared through the centrality measures. Depression, stress, anxiety and fear of COVID formed a spatially contiguous pattern, which remained unchanged in both the two waves. After the lockdown, the fear of COVID node reduced its strength in the network, whereas inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty and emotion suppression were associated with depression. Emotion regulation was connected to depression, but not to stress and anxiety during both waves. Perceived emotional support had few connections to the other nodes. Only 32.7% of participants provided complete responses for both waves. The COVID-19 outbreak has had a significant psychosocial impact on adults. In the context of the network approach, depressive symptoms had the highest strength and their associations to other dimensions of individual distress may be key factors in understanding the influence of exposure to the COVID-19 outbreak on mental health.
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.016