Loading…

Contemporary short-term outcomes of surgery for aortic stenosis: transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement

Objectives This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacements (TAVR and SAVR) in high-, intermediate-, and low-preoperative risk patients. Methods A total of 454 patients who underwent TAVR or SAVR were included. Patients were categorized into...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2022-02, Vol.70 (2), p.124-131
Main Authors: Saito, Shunsuke, Sairenchi, Toshimi, Tezuka, Masahiro, Takei, Yusuke, Tsuchiya, Go, Ogata, Koji, Monta, Osamu, Shibasaki, Ikuko, Tsutsumi, Yasushi, Fukuda, Hirotsugu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacements (TAVR and SAVR) in high-, intermediate-, and low-preoperative risk patients. Methods A total of 454 patients who underwent TAVR or SAVR were included. Patients were categorized into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk according to the Society of Thoracic Surgery-Predicted Risk of Mortality score and clinical outcomes were compared between TAVR and SAVR groups. Results TAVR was less invasive, with less bleeding and transfusion ( p  
ISSN:1863-6705
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-021-01672-8