Loading…

Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation

The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical epigenetics 2022-02, Vol.14 (1), p.19-19, Article 19
Main Authors: Hentschel, Anouk E, Beijert, Irene J, Bosschieter, Judith, Kauer, Paul C, Vis, André N, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I, van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A, Steenbergen, Renske D M, Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Clinical epigenetics
container_volume 14
creator Hentschel, Anouk E
Beijert, Irene J
Bosschieter, Judith
Kauer, Paul C
Vis, André N
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I
van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A
Steenbergen, Renske D M
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A
description The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8818199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A692027542</galeid><sourcerecordid>A692027542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vEzEQtRCIVqV_gAOyxIXLFn_sh80BKS0tIFVwgbPl2LOJi9cb7N1I_fdMkhIownPwyPPe88zoEfKSswvOVfu2cMlrVTEhKsZFzSr1hJxiQVUdU_LpMe-aE3Jeyh3DI7XWnD0nJ7LhQjaNOiXlMlrvIVNnk8PLwwRuCmOiIdE5hwR0LiGt6IcvCzrAtL6Pdl8ebP4BubyjliJjnYKzkdrk6SaPZbPT2ALm4GI41LY2Br_nviDPehsLnD_cZ-T7zfW3q0_V7dePn68Wt5WrdTdV7VKqDnzb99wz5gR2r0BZrVsptbPSKdvUXkm91Np3PWMd01wIBx6hveDyjLw_6G7m5QDeQZqyjWaTAzZ_b0YbzONKCmuzGrdGKa641ijw5kEgjz9nKJMZQnEQo00wzsWIFkPITjKEvv4HejfOOeF4iJKsqVnTdH9QKxvBhNSP-K_biZpFqwUTXVMLRF38B4XhYQhuTNAHfH9EEAeCw92XDP1xRs7Mzi3m4BaDbjF7txiFpFd_b-dI-e0N-Qs2brpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630540557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Beijert, Irene J ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Kauer, Paul C ; Vis, André N ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A ; Steenbergen, Renske D M ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Beijert, Irene J ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Kauer, Paul C ; Vis, André N ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A ; Steenbergen, Renske D M ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><description>The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p &lt; 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females. This technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-7075</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1868-7083</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-7083</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35123558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Area Under Curve ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Biomarkers - urine ; Bladder cancer ; Cancer ; Cellular biology ; Comparative analysis ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diagnosis ; DNA ; DNA methylation ; DNA Methylation - genetics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Gender ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic research ; Hematuria ; Humans ; Male ; Methylation ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patients ; Population studies ; Prospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Sample size ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Tumors ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Clinical epigenetics, 2022-02, Vol.14 (1), p.19-19, Article 19</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6397-0301</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818199/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2630540557?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beijert, Irene J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauer, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, André N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><title>Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation</title><title>Clinical epigenetics</title><addtitle>Clin Epigenetics</addtitle><description>The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p &lt; 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females. This technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers - urine</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>DNA Methylation - genetics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Hematuria</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methylation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>1868-7075</issn><issn>1868-7083</issn><issn>1868-7083</issn><issn>1868-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vEzEQtRCIVqV_gAOyxIXLFn_sh80BKS0tIFVwgbPl2LOJi9cb7N1I_fdMkhIownPwyPPe88zoEfKSswvOVfu2cMlrVTEhKsZFzSr1hJxiQVUdU_LpMe-aE3Jeyh3DI7XWnD0nJ7LhQjaNOiXlMlrvIVNnk8PLwwRuCmOiIdE5hwR0LiGt6IcvCzrAtL6Pdl8ebP4BubyjliJjnYKzkdrk6SaPZbPT2ALm4GI41LY2Br_nviDPehsLnD_cZ-T7zfW3q0_V7dePn68Wt5WrdTdV7VKqDnzb99wz5gR2r0BZrVsptbPSKdvUXkm91Np3PWMd01wIBx6hveDyjLw_6G7m5QDeQZqyjWaTAzZ_b0YbzONKCmuzGrdGKa641ijw5kEgjz9nKJMZQnEQo00wzsWIFkPITjKEvv4HejfOOeF4iJKsqVnTdH9QKxvBhNSP-K_biZpFqwUTXVMLRF38B4XhYQhuTNAHfH9EEAeCw92XDP1xRs7Mzi3m4BaDbjF7txiFpFd_b-dI-e0N-Qs2brpE</recordid><startdate>20220205</startdate><enddate>20220205</enddate><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E</creator><creator>Beijert, Irene J</creator><creator>Bosschieter, Judith</creator><creator>Kauer, Paul C</creator><creator>Vis, André N</creator><creator>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creator><creator>van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A</creator><creator>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-0301</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220205</creationdate><title>Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation</title><author>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Beijert, Irene J ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Kauer, Paul C ; Vis, André N ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A ; Steenbergen, Renske D M ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers - urine</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>DNA Methylation - genetics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Hematuria</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methylation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beijert, Irene J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauer, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, André N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical epigenetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hentschel, Anouk E</au><au>Beijert, Irene J</au><au>Bosschieter, Judith</au><au>Kauer, Paul C</au><au>Vis, André N</au><au>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</au><au>van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A</au><au>Steenbergen, Renske D M</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical epigenetics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Epigenetics</addtitle><date>2022-02-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>19-19</pages><artnum>19</artnum><issn>1868-7075</issn><issn>1868-7083</issn><eissn>1868-7083</eissn><eissn>1868-7075</eissn><abstract>The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p &lt; 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females. This technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35123558</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-0301</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-7075
ispartof Clinical epigenetics, 2022-02, Vol.14 (1), p.19-19, Article 19
issn 1868-7075
1868-7083
1868-7083
1868-7075
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8818199
source Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫); PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Area Under Curve
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - analysis
Biomarkers - urine
Bladder cancer
Cancer
Cellular biology
Comparative analysis
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Diagnosis
DNA
DNA methylation
DNA Methylation - genetics
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gender
Genetic aspects
Genetic research
Hematuria
Humans
Male
Methylation
Middle Aged
Netherlands - epidemiology
Oncology, Experimental
Patients
Population studies
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sample size
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Tumors
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - epidemiology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine
Urine
title Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bladder%20cancer%20detection%20in%20urine%20using%20DNA%20methylation%20markers:%20a%20technical%20and%20prospective%20preclinical%20validation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20epigenetics&rft.au=Hentschel,%20Anouk%20E&rft.date=2022-02-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=19-19&rft.artnum=19&rft.issn=1868-7075&rft.eissn=1868-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA692027542%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6b387ed6ff1d00c23998e8a996339ca3c8a54d839b99d7f00709122ced239f213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630540557&rft_id=info:pmid/35123558&rft_galeid=A692027542&rfr_iscdi=true