Mandatory vaccination and the ‘seat belt analogy’ argument: a critical analysis in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

The seat belt analogy argument is aimed at furthering the success of coercive vaccination efforts on the basis that the latter is similar to compulsory use of seat belts. However, this article demonstrated that this argument does not work so well in practice due to several reasons. The possibility o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine, health care, and philosophy health care, and philosophy, 2022-06, Vol.25 (2), p.219-224
Main Author: de Miguel Beriain, Iñigo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accidents, Traffic
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 - prevention & control
Education
Ethics
Humans
Medical Law
Pandemics - prevention & control
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Medicine
Scientific Contribution
Seat Belts
Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Vaccination
Vaccines
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The seat belt analogy argument is aimed at furthering the success of coercive vaccination efforts on the basis that the latter is similar to compulsory use of seat belts. However, this article demonstrated that this argument does not work so well in practice due to several reasons. The possibility of saving resources in health care does not usually apply in our societies, and the paternalist mentality that contributed to the implementation of seat belt–wearing obligation was predominant 30 years ago, but it does not apply at this moment. Furthermore, the risk/benefit analysis is totally different in both scenarios. In the case of seat belts, there is no way to discriminate between the users. In the case of vaccines, individuals present with unique circumstances that may differ substantially from those of another and might be foreseen a priori. This means that an analysis must be performed individually before vaccination is imposed. Finally, one must keep in mind that seat belts are often the only way in which we can protect third parties against a tragic hit by the occupant of another vehicle and are very efficient tools for this purpose. Vaccines, in contrast, do not always create sterilising immunity and are definitely not the only way by which we can avoid spreading a virus; immunity certificates, isolation, or even confinement may also serve as viable methods to achieve this purpose.
ISSN:1386-7423
1572-8633
DOI:10.1007/s11019-022-10068-1