Loading…
Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial
To investigate efficiency, behavior, and properties of superelastic NiTi vs multistranded stainless steel wires in Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) under moderate to severe crowding conditions. Ninety-six participants (48 male, 48 female), aged 12-18 years old (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.95)...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Angle orthodontist 2012-09, Vol.82 (5), p.915-921 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-dc40edfde6009ed805356ea9cb6254d0940e80b36db327caea9b1fa463334d753 |
container_end_page | 921 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 915 |
container_title | The Angle orthodontist |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Sandhu, Satpal S Shetty, V Surendra Mogra, Subraya Varghese, Joseph Sandhu, Jasleen Sandhu, Jagpreet S |
description | To investigate efficiency, behavior, and properties of superelastic NiTi vs multistranded stainless steel wires in Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) under moderate to severe crowding conditions.
Ninety-six participants (48 male, 48 female), aged 12-18 years old (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.95), with moderate (≤ 6 mm; mean = 5.3 ± 0.48) to severe (> 6 mm; mean = 7.9 ± 0.66) initial crowding were distributed into four groups: superelastic NiTi PEA (n = 24), superelastic NiTi Begg (n = 24), multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA (n = 25), and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg (n = 23). In this study, 0.16-inch superelastic (austenitic active) NiTi and 0.175-inch multistranded (six stranded, coaxial) stainless steel wires were used in a 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) PEA and Begg appliance with a follow-up of six weeks.
Analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in reduction of crowding between superelastic NiTi PEA and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA groups, but reduction in crowding was significantly greater in the superelastic NiTi Begg group compared with the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group with F (3, 44) = 8.896, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.57 in moderate crowding and F (3, 44) = 122.341, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.93 in severe crowding. Linear regression demonstrated significant (P < .05) positive correlation between amount of initial crowding and reduction in crowding in all groups except the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group, wherein a negative correlation did exist.
Superelastic NiTi performed significantly better than multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel wire in the Begg appliance. However, in PEA, there was no significant difference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2319/100311-622.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8823112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1038603429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-dc40edfde6009ed805356ea9cb6254d0940e80b36db327caea9b1fa463334d753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRAV3RZunCsfOWxaf8TZpAekqmoBqYJLOVuOPaGDvEnqcRb1N_CncbWlhbnMWO_Nm_E8xt5Lcaq07M6kEFrKqlHqVL5iK9nVptpIoV-zlShQpZXsDtkR0U8hlDG1esMOVQljtFix31fDgB5h9A9r3sOd2-GU1tyNgfuII3oX-ZymGVJGID4NnJbygOgoo-df8Rb5DhItxLdLzEg5lV4InLLDMQJRqQAi_4UJ6Jy7RzWawWfcwcuInNDFt-xgcJHg3VM-Zt-vr24vP1c33z59uby4qbwWOlfB1wLCEKARooPQCqNNA67zfaNMHURX4Fb0ugm9VhvvCtTLwdWN1roOG6OP2ce97rz0WwgexrJ0tHPCrUsPdnJo_0dGvLM_pp1t23JxqYrAhyeBNN0vQNlukTzE6EaYFrLl-m0jdK26Ql3vqb58mxIMz2OksI_-2b1_tvhnZaGf_LvaM_mvYfoP6ZWZwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038603429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sandhu, Satpal S ; Shetty, V Surendra ; Mogra, Subraya ; Varghese, Joseph ; Sandhu, Jasleen ; Sandhu, Jagpreet S</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Satpal S ; Shetty, V Surendra ; Mogra, Subraya ; Varghese, Joseph ; Sandhu, Jasleen ; Sandhu, Jagpreet S</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate efficiency, behavior, and properties of superelastic NiTi vs multistranded stainless steel wires in Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) under moderate to severe crowding conditions.
Ninety-six participants (48 male, 48 female), aged 12-18 years old (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.95), with moderate (≤ 6 mm; mean = 5.3 ± 0.48) to severe (> 6 mm; mean = 7.9 ± 0.66) initial crowding were distributed into four groups: superelastic NiTi PEA (n = 24), superelastic NiTi Begg (n = 24), multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA (n = 25), and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg (n = 23). In this study, 0.16-inch superelastic (austenitic active) NiTi and 0.175-inch multistranded (six stranded, coaxial) stainless steel wires were used in a 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) PEA and Begg appliance with a follow-up of six weeks.
Analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in reduction of crowding between superelastic NiTi PEA and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA groups, but reduction in crowding was significantly greater in the superelastic NiTi Begg group compared with the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group with F (3, 44) = 8.896, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.57 in moderate crowding and F (3, 44) = 122.341, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.93 in severe crowding. Linear regression demonstrated significant (P < .05) positive correlation between amount of initial crowding and reduction in crowding in all groups except the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group, wherein a negative correlation did exist.
Superelastic NiTi performed significantly better than multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel wire in the Begg appliance. However, in PEA, there was no significant difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/100311-622.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22225530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Edward H Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Analysis of Variance ; Child ; Dental Alloys - chemistry ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Elasticity ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion - therapy ; Mandible - anatomy & histology ; Materials Testing ; Nickel - chemistry ; Original ; Orthodontic Appliance Design - instrumentation ; Orthodontic Wires ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Stainless Steel - chemistry ; Titanium - chemistry ; Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2012-09, Vol.82 (5), p.915-921</ispartof><rights>2012 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-dc40edfde6009ed805356ea9cb6254d0940e80b36db327caea9b1fa463334d753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823112/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823112/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22225530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Satpal S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, V Surendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogra, Subraya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Jasleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Jagpreet S</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To investigate efficiency, behavior, and properties of superelastic NiTi vs multistranded stainless steel wires in Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) under moderate to severe crowding conditions.
Ninety-six participants (48 male, 48 female), aged 12-18 years old (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.95), with moderate (≤ 6 mm; mean = 5.3 ± 0.48) to severe (> 6 mm; mean = 7.9 ± 0.66) initial crowding were distributed into four groups: superelastic NiTi PEA (n = 24), superelastic NiTi Begg (n = 24), multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA (n = 25), and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg (n = 23). In this study, 0.16-inch superelastic (austenitic active) NiTi and 0.175-inch multistranded (six stranded, coaxial) stainless steel wires were used in a 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) PEA and Begg appliance with a follow-up of six weeks.
Analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in reduction of crowding between superelastic NiTi PEA and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA groups, but reduction in crowding was significantly greater in the superelastic NiTi Begg group compared with the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group with F (3, 44) = 8.896, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.57 in moderate crowding and F (3, 44) = 122.341, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.93 in severe crowding. Linear regression demonstrated significant (P < .05) positive correlation between amount of initial crowding and reduction in crowding in all groups except the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group, wherein a negative correlation did exist.
Superelastic NiTi performed significantly better than multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel wire in the Begg appliance. However, in PEA, there was no significant difference.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dental Alloys - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion - therapy</subject><subject>Mandible - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Nickel - chemistry</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Stainless Steel - chemistry</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRAV3RZunCsfOWxaf8TZpAekqmoBqYJLOVuOPaGDvEnqcRb1N_CncbWlhbnMWO_Nm_E8xt5Lcaq07M6kEFrKqlHqVL5iK9nVptpIoV-zlShQpZXsDtkR0U8hlDG1esMOVQljtFix31fDgB5h9A9r3sOd2-GU1tyNgfuII3oX-ZymGVJGID4NnJbygOgoo-df8Rb5DhItxLdLzEg5lV4InLLDMQJRqQAi_4UJ6Jy7RzWawWfcwcuInNDFt-xgcJHg3VM-Zt-vr24vP1c33z59uby4qbwWOlfB1wLCEKARooPQCqNNA67zfaNMHURX4Fb0ugm9VhvvCtTLwdWN1roOG6OP2ce97rz0WwgexrJ0tHPCrUsPdnJo_0dGvLM_pp1t23JxqYrAhyeBNN0vQNlukTzE6EaYFrLl-m0jdK26Ql3vqb58mxIMz2OksI_-2b1_tvhnZaGf_LvaM_mvYfoP6ZWZwQ</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Sandhu, Satpal S</creator><creator>Shetty, V Surendra</creator><creator>Mogra, Subraya</creator><creator>Varghese, Joseph</creator><creator>Sandhu, Jasleen</creator><creator>Sandhu, Jagpreet S</creator><general>Edward H Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial</title><author>Sandhu, Satpal S ; Shetty, V Surendra ; Mogra, Subraya ; Varghese, Joseph ; Sandhu, Jasleen ; Sandhu, Jagpreet S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-dc40edfde6009ed805356ea9cb6254d0940e80b36db327caea9b1fa463334d753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dental Alloys - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion - therapy</topic><topic>Mandible - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Nickel - chemistry</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Stainless Steel - chemistry</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Satpal S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, V Surendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogra, Subraya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varghese, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Jasleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Jagpreet S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandhu, Satpal S</au><au>Shetty, V Surendra</au><au>Mogra, Subraya</au><au>Varghese, Joseph</au><au>Sandhu, Jasleen</au><au>Sandhu, Jagpreet S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>915</spage><epage>921</epage><pages>915-921</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To investigate efficiency, behavior, and properties of superelastic NiTi vs multistranded stainless steel wires in Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) under moderate to severe crowding conditions.
Ninety-six participants (48 male, 48 female), aged 12-18 years old (mean age = 15.2 ± 1.95), with moderate (≤ 6 mm; mean = 5.3 ± 0.48) to severe (> 6 mm; mean = 7.9 ± 0.66) initial crowding were distributed into four groups: superelastic NiTi PEA (n = 24), superelastic NiTi Begg (n = 24), multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA (n = 25), and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg (n = 23). In this study, 0.16-inch superelastic (austenitic active) NiTi and 0.175-inch multistranded (six stranded, coaxial) stainless steel wires were used in a 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) PEA and Begg appliance with a follow-up of six weeks.
Analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in reduction of crowding between superelastic NiTi PEA and multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel PEA groups, but reduction in crowding was significantly greater in the superelastic NiTi Begg group compared with the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group with F (3, 44) = 8.896, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.57 in moderate crowding and F (3, 44) = 122.341, P < .001, and effect size (ω) 0.93 in severe crowding. Linear regression demonstrated significant (P < .05) positive correlation between amount of initial crowding and reduction in crowding in all groups except the multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel Begg group, wherein a negative correlation did exist.
Superelastic NiTi performed significantly better than multistranded (coaxial) stainless steel wire in the Begg appliance. However, in PEA, there was no significant difference.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Edward H Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc</pub><pmid>22225530</pmid><doi>10.2319/100311-622.1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3219 |
ispartof | The Angle orthodontist, 2012-09, Vol.82 (5), p.915-921 |
issn | 0003-3219 1945-7103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8823112 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Analysis of Variance Child Dental Alloys - chemistry Dental Stress Analysis Elasticity Female Humans Male Malocclusion - therapy Mandible - anatomy & histology Materials Testing Nickel - chemistry Original Orthodontic Appliance Design - instrumentation Orthodontic Wires Prospective Studies Regression Analysis Stainless Steel - chemistry Titanium - chemistry Tooth Movement Techniques - instrumentation |
title | Efficiency, behavior, and clinical properties of superelastic NiTi versus multistranded stainless steel wires: a prospective clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency,%20behavior,%20and%20clinical%20properties%20of%20superelastic%20NiTi%20versus%20multistranded%20stainless%20steel%20wires:%20a%20prospective%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Sandhu,%20Satpal%20S&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=915&rft.epage=921&rft.pages=915-921&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/100311-622.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1038603429%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-dc40edfde6009ed805356ea9cb6254d0940e80b36db327caea9b1fa463334d753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038603429&rft_id=info:pmid/22225530&rfr_iscdi=true |