Loading…
Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological resul...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2022-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Takeuchi, Takumi Yamagishi, Kenichiro Konishi, Kazumasa Sano, Hideto Takahashi, Masato Ichimura, Shoichi Kono, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Masaichi Hosogane, Naobumi |
description | The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above-two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above-two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above-two below fixation (
= 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above-two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm11030629 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8836420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627591672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdklFv0zAQxyMEYtPYE-_IEi9IqJsdJ07KA1Kp1m1Sp6LBeI0c-9K6SuxgO0X9pHwdLuo2lfnFPvt3f__PviR5z-gF51N6uVUdY5RTkU5fJacpLYoJ5SV_fbQ-Sc5D2FIcZZmlrHibnPCcCQzpafL3XmrjWrc2SrbkaifbQUbjLHENmbuuNhY0mdkI3vUu4GScJ4shjMgfEzfkF_gItcfkb07vyT30rVTQgY3kIRi7JpLcGWs62bZ7cmt3MpgdkKVEKcyZ9b13Um1Ig7Ir1MdbvItGHekuvFRx8BC-jJumQadPDld9HJXJj8EfCvjunQKN8LvkTSPbAOeP81nysLj6Ob-ZLFfXt_PZcqIyOo2TOpMZ1RwwUKmoc42vJEot80KqnJasAaYZ17rOhCobUUBdC8GgoFxmXNKGnyVfD7r9UHegFdaNnqveoy-_r5w01f8n1myqtdtVZclFllIU-PQo4N3vAUKsOhMUtK204IZQpfizVLCMpoh-fIFu3eAtljdSRT5lohipzwdKeReCh-bZDKPV2DPVUc8g_eHY_zP71CH8H_FRwvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627591672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Takeuchi, Takumi ; Yamagishi, Kenichiro ; Konishi, Kazumasa ; Sano, Hideto ; Takahashi, Masato ; Ichimura, Shoichi ; Kono, Hitoshi ; Hasegawa, Masaichi ; Hosogane, Naobumi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Takumi ; Yamagishi, Kenichiro ; Konishi, Kazumasa ; Sano, Hideto ; Takahashi, Masato ; Ichimura, Shoichi ; Kono, Hitoshi ; Hasegawa, Masaichi ; Hosogane, Naobumi</creatorcontrib><description>The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above-two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above-two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above-two below fixation (
= 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above-two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030629</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35160080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Back surgery ; Clinical medicine ; Fractures ; Osteoporosis ; Surgeons ; Surgical outcomes ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627591672/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627591672?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Hideto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kono, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Masaichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosogane, Naobumi</creatorcontrib><title>Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above-two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above-two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above-two below fixation (
= 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above-two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.</description><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdklFv0zAQxyMEYtPYE-_IEi9IqJsdJ07KA1Kp1m1Sp6LBeI0c-9K6SuxgO0X9pHwdLuo2lfnFPvt3f__PviR5z-gF51N6uVUdY5RTkU5fJacpLYoJ5SV_fbQ-Sc5D2FIcZZmlrHibnPCcCQzpafL3XmrjWrc2SrbkaifbQUbjLHENmbuuNhY0mdkI3vUu4GScJ4shjMgfEzfkF_gItcfkb07vyT30rVTQgY3kIRi7JpLcGWs62bZ7cmt3MpgdkKVEKcyZ9b13Um1Ig7Ir1MdbvItGHekuvFRx8BC-jJumQadPDld9HJXJj8EfCvjunQKN8LvkTSPbAOeP81nysLj6Ob-ZLFfXt_PZcqIyOo2TOpMZ1RwwUKmoc42vJEot80KqnJasAaYZ17rOhCobUUBdC8GgoFxmXNKGnyVfD7r9UHegFdaNnqveoy-_r5w01f8n1myqtdtVZclFllIU-PQo4N3vAUKsOhMUtK204IZQpfizVLCMpoh-fIFu3eAtljdSRT5lohipzwdKeReCh-bZDKPV2DPVUc8g_eHY_zP71CH8H_FRwvs</recordid><startdate>20220126</startdate><enddate>20220126</enddate><creator>Takeuchi, Takumi</creator><creator>Yamagishi, Kenichiro</creator><creator>Konishi, Kazumasa</creator><creator>Sano, Hideto</creator><creator>Takahashi, Masato</creator><creator>Ichimura, Shoichi</creator><creator>Kono, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Masaichi</creator><creator>Hosogane, Naobumi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220126</creationdate><title>Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure</title><author>Takeuchi, Takumi ; Yamagishi, Kenichiro ; Konishi, Kazumasa ; Sano, Hideto ; Takahashi, Masato ; Ichimura, Shoichi ; Kono, Hitoshi ; Hasegawa, Masaichi ; Hosogane, Naobumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Hideto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kono, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Masaichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosogane, Naobumi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeuchi, Takumi</au><au>Yamagishi, Kenichiro</au><au>Konishi, Kazumasa</au><au>Sano, Hideto</au><au>Takahashi, Masato</au><au>Ichimura, Shoichi</au><au>Kono, Hitoshi</au><au>Hasegawa, Masaichi</au><au>Hosogane, Naobumi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-01-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>629</spage><pages>629-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above-two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above-two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above-two below fixation (
= 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above-two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35160080</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11030629</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-01, Vol.11 (3), p.629 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8836420 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Back surgery Clinical medicine Fractures Osteoporosis Surgeons Surgical outcomes Vertebrae |
title | Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A33%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiological%20Evaluation%20of%20Combined%20Anteroposterior%20Fusion%20with%20Vertebral%20Body%20Replacement%20Using%20a%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Lateral%20Approach%20for%20Osteoporotic%20Vertebral%20Fractures:%20Verification%20of%20Optimal%20Surgical%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Takeuchi,%20Takumi&rft.date=2022-01-26&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=629&rft.pages=629-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11030629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2627591672%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b4a40d3e409c26b5d00068da57ac5081fe1d13ddb46c8f67ebb661e703a43a0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627591672&rft_id=info:pmid/35160080&rfr_iscdi=true |