Loading…

Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study

The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group ( = 44)-full pulpotomy performed b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2022-01, Vol.11 (3), p.787
Main Authors: Beauquis, Julien, Setbon, Hugo M, Dassargues, Charles, Carsin, Pierre, Aryanpour, Sam, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre, Leprince, Julian G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group ( = 44)-full pulpotomy performed by non-specialist junior practitioners, and a control group ( = 40)-root canal treatments performed by specialized endodontists. Short-term pain score (Heft-Parker scale) was recorded pre-operatively, then at 24 h and 7 days post-operatively. Three outcomes were considered for treatment success: , and success. For short-term evolution of pain, a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was performed (significance level = 0.05). For treatment success, a Pearson Chi square or Fisher test were performed (significance level = 0.017-Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference between and control groups neither regarding short term evolution of pain at each time point, nor regarding (80% and 90%, respectively) or success (77% and 67%, respectively). However, a significant difference in success was observed (94% and 69%, respectively). The present work adds to the existing literature to support that pulpotomy as permanent treatment could be considered as an acceptable and conservative treatment option, potentially applied by a larger population of dentists.
ISSN:2077-0383
2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm11030787