An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials

To assess and compare the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth when the retrograde preparations were restored either with Biodentine or Endosequence BC RRM Fast set putty or Geristore. One hundred and twenty human mandibular premolars were used and allocated randomly into five groups (n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European endodontic journal 2021-01, Vol.6 (3), p.319-324
Main Authors: Penmatsa, Prasanthi, Boddeda, Mohan, Mandava, Jyothi, Ravi, Ravichandra, Priyanka, Angadala, Pulidindi, Hema
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bicuspid - surgery
Data analysis
Endodontics
Flexural Strength
Humans
Original
Root Canal Filling Materials
Root Canal Obturation - methods
Tooth, Nonvital - therapy
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 324
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title European endodontic journal
container_volume 6
creator Penmatsa, Prasanthi
Boddeda, Mohan
Mandava, Jyothi
Ravi, Ravichandra
Priyanka, Angadala
Pulidindi, Hema
description To assess and compare the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth when the retrograde preparations were restored either with Biodentine or Endosequence BC RRM Fast set putty or Geristore. One hundred and twenty human mandibular premolars were used and allocated randomly into five groups (n=24 each). Following conventional root canal treatment, and apical root resection, retrograde cavities of 3 mm were prepared using ultrasonic tips. Group 1 (intact, sound teeth), Group 2 (without rootend filling), Groups 3, 4 and 5were allocated for Biodentine, Endosequence BC RRM putty, and Geristore respectively. Thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (TMC) was performed for one section of samples in each group (n=12 each) following which immediate and after TMC fracture resistance was evaluated using the Instron machine. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures was used for data analysis. Intact teeth had shown the highest fracture strength values than all other four groups (P
doi_str_mv 10.14744/eej.2021.55265
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8842430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615476982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-23bf2030a169ce381ecbdf7bf2d8ff9aa4153bff817e08df6da9534811e90b993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhkVpiUOac25F0Esva-trd6VLweSrgYRC656FvDtKZNZSKmkd_O-jOK5Jc9EI6ZmXGR6EziiZUtEKMQNYTRlhdFrXrKk_oGNWC1kRydXHN_cJOk1pRQhhrRKEsSM04UI1LefyGK3mHt_4auNyDPgqmi6PEfDvHMHf5wc8TwlSWoPPOFh86fvQB59dZ4ZhixcRTIYeLwAK-uTKceGshfiC_wohV6UB3xUmOjOkz-iTLQVO9_UE_bm6XJz_qG5_Xt-cz2-rjrd1rhhfWkY4MbRRHXBJoVv2ti2PvbRWGSNoXRAraQtE9rbpjaq5kJSCIkul-An6_pr7OC7X0HdlmmgG_Rjd2sStDsbp_3-8e9D3YaOlFExwUgK-7QNi-DtCynrtUgfDYDyEMWnW0Fq0jZKsoF_foaswRl_W05woKjgTTVOo2SvVxZBSBHsYhhK9U6mLSv2iUu9Ulo4vb3c48P_E8We27Zud</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3091432466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Penmatsa, Prasanthi ; Boddeda, Mohan ; Mandava, Jyothi ; Ravi, Ravichandra ; Priyanka, Angadala ; Pulidindi, Hema</creator><creatorcontrib>Penmatsa, Prasanthi ; Boddeda, Mohan ; Mandava, Jyothi ; Ravi, Ravichandra ; Priyanka, Angadala ; Pulidindi, Hema</creatorcontrib><description>To assess and compare the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth when the retrograde preparations were restored either with Biodentine or Endosequence BC RRM Fast set putty or Geristore. One hundred and twenty human mandibular premolars were used and allocated randomly into five groups (n=24 each). Following conventional root canal treatment, and apical root resection, retrograde cavities of 3 mm were prepared using ultrasonic tips. Group 1 (intact, sound teeth), Group 2 (without rootend filling), Groups 3, 4 and 5were allocated for Biodentine, Endosequence BC RRM putty, and Geristore respectively. Thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (TMC) was performed for one section of samples in each group (n=12 each) following which immediate and after TMC fracture resistance was evaluated using the Instron machine. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures was used for data analysis. Intact teeth had shown the highest fracture strength values than all other four groups (P&lt;0.05) and resected roots without root-end filling group exhibited the lowest resistance to fracture. Amongst the test groups, Endosequence BC RRM putty displayed improved fracture strength, and Geristore exhibited the least resistance to fracture. Fracture strength values were not statistically different among Endosequence fast set putty and Biodentine group samples immediately and after thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (P=0.5987 and 0.9999 respectively). The fracture strength was notsignificantly different between Geristore and without root-end filling groups (P=0.3530). Endodontically treated teeth with Endosequence BC RRM putty or Biodentine root-end filled teeth had shown better fracture resistance compared to Geristore. Retrofilling with Geristore was not able to improve fracture strength of root canal-treated teeth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2548-0839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2548-0839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14744/eej.2021.55265</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34967338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Kare Publishing</publisher><subject>Bicuspid - surgery ; Data analysis ; Endodontics ; Flexural Strength ; Humans ; Original ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</subject><ispartof>European endodontic journal, 2021-01, Vol.6 (3), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 European Endodontic Journal 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842430/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3091432466?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34967338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penmatsa, Prasanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddeda, Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandava, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Ravichandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priyanka, Angadala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulidindi, Hema</creatorcontrib><title>An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials</title><title>European endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Eur Endod J</addtitle><description>To assess and compare the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth when the retrograde preparations were restored either with Biodentine or Endosequence BC RRM Fast set putty or Geristore. One hundred and twenty human mandibular premolars were used and allocated randomly into five groups (n=24 each). Following conventional root canal treatment, and apical root resection, retrograde cavities of 3 mm were prepared using ultrasonic tips. Group 1 (intact, sound teeth), Group 2 (without rootend filling), Groups 3, 4 and 5were allocated for Biodentine, Endosequence BC RRM putty, and Geristore respectively. Thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (TMC) was performed for one section of samples in each group (n=12 each) following which immediate and after TMC fracture resistance was evaluated using the Instron machine. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures was used for data analysis. Intact teeth had shown the highest fracture strength values than all other four groups (P&lt;0.05) and resected roots without root-end filling group exhibited the lowest resistance to fracture. Amongst the test groups, Endosequence BC RRM putty displayed improved fracture strength, and Geristore exhibited the least resistance to fracture. Fracture strength values were not statistically different among Endosequence fast set putty and Biodentine group samples immediately and after thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (P=0.5987 and 0.9999 respectively). The fracture strength was notsignificantly different between Geristore and without root-end filling groups (P=0.3530). Endodontically treated teeth with Endosequence BC RRM putty or Biodentine root-end filled teeth had shown better fracture resistance compared to Geristore. Retrofilling with Geristore was not able to improve fracture strength of root canal-treated teeth.</description><subject>Bicuspid - surgery</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Flexural Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</subject><issn>2548-0839</issn><issn>2548-0839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhkVpiUOac25F0Esva-trd6VLweSrgYRC656FvDtKZNZSKmkd_O-jOK5Jc9EI6ZmXGR6EziiZUtEKMQNYTRlhdFrXrKk_oGNWC1kRydXHN_cJOk1pRQhhrRKEsSM04UI1LefyGK3mHt_4auNyDPgqmi6PEfDvHMHf5wc8TwlSWoPPOFh86fvQB59dZ4ZhixcRTIYeLwAK-uTKceGshfiC_wohV6UB3xUmOjOkz-iTLQVO9_UE_bm6XJz_qG5_Xt-cz2-rjrd1rhhfWkY4MbRRHXBJoVv2ti2PvbRWGSNoXRAraQtE9rbpjaq5kJSCIkul-An6_pr7OC7X0HdlmmgG_Rjd2sStDsbp_3-8e9D3YaOlFExwUgK-7QNi-DtCynrtUgfDYDyEMWnW0Fq0jZKsoF_foaswRl_W05woKjgTTVOo2SvVxZBSBHsYhhK9U6mLSv2iUu9Ulo4vb3c48P_E8We27Zud</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Penmatsa, Prasanthi</creator><creator>Boddeda, Mohan</creator><creator>Mandava, Jyothi</creator><creator>Ravi, Ravichandra</creator><creator>Priyanka, Angadala</creator><creator>Pulidindi, Hema</creator><general>Kare Publishing</general><general>Carol Davila University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials</title><author>Penmatsa, Prasanthi ; Boddeda, Mohan ; Mandava, Jyothi ; Ravi, Ravichandra ; Priyanka, Angadala ; Pulidindi, Hema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-23bf2030a169ce381ecbdf7bf2d8ff9aa4153bff817e08df6da9534811e90b993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bicuspid - surgery</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Flexural Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penmatsa, Prasanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddeda, Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandava, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Ravichandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priyanka, Angadala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulidindi, Hema</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penmatsa, Prasanthi</au><au>Boddeda, Mohan</au><au>Mandava, Jyothi</au><au>Ravi, Ravichandra</au><au>Priyanka, Angadala</au><au>Pulidindi, Hema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials</atitle><jtitle>European endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Endod J</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>2548-0839</issn><eissn>2548-0839</eissn><abstract>To assess and compare the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth when the retrograde preparations were restored either with Biodentine or Endosequence BC RRM Fast set putty or Geristore. One hundred and twenty human mandibular premolars were used and allocated randomly into five groups (n=24 each). Following conventional root canal treatment, and apical root resection, retrograde cavities of 3 mm were prepared using ultrasonic tips. Group 1 (intact, sound teeth), Group 2 (without rootend filling), Groups 3, 4 and 5were allocated for Biodentine, Endosequence BC RRM putty, and Geristore respectively. Thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (TMC) was performed for one section of samples in each group (n=12 each) following which immediate and after TMC fracture resistance was evaluated using the Instron machine. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple post-hoc procedures was used for data analysis. Intact teeth had shown the highest fracture strength values than all other four groups (P&lt;0.05) and resected roots without root-end filling group exhibited the lowest resistance to fracture. Amongst the test groups, Endosequence BC RRM putty displayed improved fracture strength, and Geristore exhibited the least resistance to fracture. Fracture strength values were not statistically different among Endosequence fast set putty and Biodentine group samples immediately and after thermo-mechanical cyclic loading (P=0.5987 and 0.9999 respectively). The fracture strength was notsignificantly different between Geristore and without root-end filling groups (P=0.3530). Endodontically treated teeth with Endosequence BC RRM putty or Biodentine root-end filled teeth had shown better fracture resistance compared to Geristore. Retrofilling with Geristore was not able to improve fracture strength of root canal-treated teeth.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Kare Publishing</pub><pmid>34967338</pmid><doi>10.14744/eej.2021.55265</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2548-0839
ispartof European endodontic journal, 2021-01, Vol.6 (3), p.319-324
issn 2548-0839
2548-0839
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8842430
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Bicuspid - surgery
Data analysis
Endodontics
Flexural Strength
Humans
Original
Root Canal Filling Materials
Root Canal Obturation - methods
Tooth, Nonvital - therapy
title An In-vitro Fracture Strength Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Root-End Materials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T04%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20In-vitro%20Fracture%20Strength%20Assessment%20of%20Endodontically%20Treated%20Teeth%20with%20Different%20Root-End%20Materials&rft.jtitle=European%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Penmatsa,%20Prasanthi&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=2548-0839&rft.eissn=2548-0839&rft_id=info:doi/10.14744/eej.2021.55265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2615476982%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-23bf2030a169ce381ecbdf7bf2d8ff9aa4153bff817e08df6da9534811e90b993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3091432466&rft_id=info:pmid/34967338&rfr_iscdi=true