Loading…
High-resolution three‑dimensional contrast‑enhanced magnetic resonance venography in children: comparison of gadofosveset trisodium with ferumoxytol
Background Gadofosveset is a gadolinium-based blood pool contrast agent that was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2008. Its unanticipated withdrawal from production in 2016 created a void in the blood pool agent inventory and highlighted the need for an alternative agent...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric radiology 2022-03, Vol.52 (3), p.501-512 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Gadofosveset is a gadolinium-based blood pool contrast agent that was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2008. Its unanticipated withdrawal from production in 2016 created a void in the blood pool agent inventory and highlighted the need for an alternative agent with comparable imaging properties.
Objective
The purpose of our study is to compare the diagnostic image quality, vascular contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and temporal signal characteristics of gadofosveset trisodium and ferumoxytol at similar molar doses for high-resolution, three-dimensional (3-D) magnetic resonance (MR) venography in children.
Materials and methods
The medical records and imaging data sets of patients who underwent high-resolution 3-D gadofosveset-enhanced MR venography (GE-MRV) or ferumoxytol-enhanced MR venography (FE-MRV) were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups of 20 pediatric patients (age- and weight-matched with one patient common to both groups; age range: 2 days–15 years) who underwent high-resolution 3-D GE-MRV or FE-MRV at similar molar doses were identified and analyzed. Qualitative analysis of image quality and vessel definition was performed by two blinded pediatric radiologists. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the AC1 (first-order agreement coefficient) statistic. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and CNR of the inferior vena cava and aorta were measured in the steady-state venous phase. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for any adverse reactions associated with either contrast agent.
Results
Measured SNR and CNR of the inferior vena cava were higher for FE-MRV than GE-MRV (
P
= 0.034 and
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00247-021-05225-2 |