Loading…

A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System

Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have had a significant impact on the management of diabetes mellitus. We present the results of a multinational evaluation of the Cascade CGM (“C-CGM”) over 14 days of in-clinic and home use. Method: Each of the 57 enrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of diabetes science and technology 2022-03, Vol.16 (2), p.390-396
Main Authors: Rebec, Mihailo, Cai, Kevin, Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph, Anderson, Ellen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653
container_end_page 396
container_issue 2
container_start_page 390
container_title Journal of diabetes science and technology
container_volume 16
creator Rebec, Mihailo
Cai, Kevin
Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph
Anderson, Ellen
description Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have had a significant impact on the management of diabetes mellitus. We present the results of a multinational evaluation of the Cascade CGM (“C-CGM”) over 14 days of in-clinic and home use. Method: Each of the 57 enrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects wore 2 C-CGMs on the abdomen for 14 days. One part of the evaluation was the performance versus reference glucose values generated for 12 -hour in-clinic sessions on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14. Glucose blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes and analyzed with the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) 2300 glucose analyzer. The performance assessment on in-clinic days was based on paired YSI/CGM data points and on home-use days was based on paired fingerstick BGM (blood glucose monitoring)/CGM data points. Results: A total of 17 823 CGM/YSI data points during in-clinic use was analyzed. The mean absolute relative difference for glucose values between 100 and 400 mg/dL (MARD) and mean absolute difference for values between 40 and 100 mg/dL (MAD) were 11.5% and 15.1 mg/dL, respectively. The system accuracy during home use was 12.7% and 15 mg/dL for MARD and MAD, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or infectious complications reported. A modified algorithm “Hybrid Algorithm” was used in a prospective analysis of the in-clinic data, resulting in a MARD of 9.9% and MAD of 14.5 mg/dL. Conclusions: The performance of the C-CGM device over 14 days meets the safety and efficacy standards of CGM systems for managing blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. This was further confirmed when the C-CGM system was given approval for CE Mark in October 2019.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1932296820964574
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8861779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1932296820964574</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2452980909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtL5EAQbsRlfe3dk_TRS7TS6fTjIkjwBQ4r7O656fRUtCVJj93JgP_ehBlFhT1VUd-jiq8IOc7hLM-lPM91wZgWioEWvJR8h-zPo6zIQe5u-xnfIwcpPQOUXEn5k-wVBSjOc7FPFpf0IYa0Qjf4NdLF2A7eYT9gpFXre-9sSx8wNiF2tndIr9a2He3gQ09DQ4cnpFVW3Szon9c0YHdEfjS2TfhrWw_Jv-urv9Vtdv_75q66vM8cL_iQCSuU5rUAyXNkJXBQRYmS2aVjUGvllGLNUgFwYYHXpWhqUSrJUGs1acvikFxsfFdj3eFyPjja1qyi72x8NcF68xXp_ZN5DGujlJhy05PB6dYghpcR02A6nxy2re0xjMkwXjKtQMNMhQ3VTTmliM3HmhzM_AXz_QuT5OTzeR-C99gnQrYhJPuI5jmMsZ_i-r_hG6wHjl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2452980909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Rebec, Mihailo ; Cai, Kevin ; Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph ; Anderson, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Rebec, Mihailo ; Cai, Kevin ; Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph ; Anderson, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have had a significant impact on the management of diabetes mellitus. We present the results of a multinational evaluation of the Cascade CGM (“C-CGM”) over 14 days of in-clinic and home use. Method: Each of the 57 enrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects wore 2 C-CGMs on the abdomen for 14 days. One part of the evaluation was the performance versus reference glucose values generated for 12 -hour in-clinic sessions on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14. Glucose blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes and analyzed with the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) 2300 glucose analyzer. The performance assessment on in-clinic days was based on paired YSI/CGM data points and on home-use days was based on paired fingerstick BGM (blood glucose monitoring)/CGM data points. Results: A total of 17 823 CGM/YSI data points during in-clinic use was analyzed. The mean absolute relative difference for glucose values between 100 and 400 mg/dL (MARD) and mean absolute difference for values between 40 and 100 mg/dL (MAD) were 11.5% and 15.1 mg/dL, respectively. The system accuracy during home use was 12.7% and 15 mg/dL for MARD and MAD, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or infectious complications reported. A modified algorithm “Hybrid Algorithm” was used in a prospective analysis of the in-clinic data, resulting in a MARD of 9.9% and MAD of 14.5 mg/dL. Conclusions: The performance of the C-CGM device over 14 days meets the safety and efficacy standards of CGM systems for managing blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. This was further confirmed when the C-CGM system was given approval for CE Mark in October 2019.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-3107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1932296820964574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33084416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Humans ; Original ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022-03, Vol.16 (2), p.390-396</ispartof><rights>2020 Diabetes Technology Society</rights><rights>2020 Diabetes Technology Society 2020 Diabetes Technology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3046-4335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861779/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861779/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33084416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rebec, Mihailo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System</title><title>Journal of diabetes science and technology</title><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have had a significant impact on the management of diabetes mellitus. We present the results of a multinational evaluation of the Cascade CGM (“C-CGM”) over 14 days of in-clinic and home use. Method: Each of the 57 enrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects wore 2 C-CGMs on the abdomen for 14 days. One part of the evaluation was the performance versus reference glucose values generated for 12 -hour in-clinic sessions on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14. Glucose blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes and analyzed with the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) 2300 glucose analyzer. The performance assessment on in-clinic days was based on paired YSI/CGM data points and on home-use days was based on paired fingerstick BGM (blood glucose monitoring)/CGM data points. Results: A total of 17 823 CGM/YSI data points during in-clinic use was analyzed. The mean absolute relative difference for glucose values between 100 and 400 mg/dL (MARD) and mean absolute difference for values between 40 and 100 mg/dL (MAD) were 11.5% and 15.1 mg/dL, respectively. The system accuracy during home use was 12.7% and 15 mg/dL for MARD and MAD, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or infectious complications reported. A modified algorithm “Hybrid Algorithm” was used in a prospective analysis of the in-clinic data, resulting in a MARD of 9.9% and MAD of 14.5 mg/dL. Conclusions: The performance of the C-CGM device over 14 days meets the safety and efficacy standards of CGM systems for managing blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. This was further confirmed when the C-CGM system was given approval for CE Mark in October 2019.</description><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1932-2968</issn><issn>1932-3107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UUtL5EAQbsRlfe3dk_TRS7TS6fTjIkjwBQ4r7O656fRUtCVJj93JgP_ehBlFhT1VUd-jiq8IOc7hLM-lPM91wZgWioEWvJR8h-zPo6zIQe5u-xnfIwcpPQOUXEn5k-wVBSjOc7FPFpf0IYa0Qjf4NdLF2A7eYT9gpFXre-9sSx8wNiF2tndIr9a2He3gQ09DQ4cnpFVW3Szon9c0YHdEfjS2TfhrWw_Jv-urv9Vtdv_75q66vM8cL_iQCSuU5rUAyXNkJXBQRYmS2aVjUGvllGLNUgFwYYHXpWhqUSrJUGs1acvikFxsfFdj3eFyPjja1qyi72x8NcF68xXp_ZN5DGujlJhy05PB6dYghpcR02A6nxy2re0xjMkwXjKtQMNMhQ3VTTmliM3HmhzM_AXz_QuT5OTzeR-C99gnQrYhJPuI5jmMsZ_i-r_hG6wHjl4</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Rebec, Mihailo</creator><creator>Cai, Kevin</creator><creator>Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph</creator><creator>Anderson, Ellen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-4335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System</title><author>Rebec, Mihailo ; Cai, Kevin ; Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph ; Anderson, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rebec, Mihailo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rebec, Mihailo</au><au>Cai, Kevin</au><au>Dutt-Ballerstadt, Ralph</au><au>Anderson, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>390-396</pages><issn>1932-2968</issn><eissn>1932-3107</eissn><abstract>Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have had a significant impact on the management of diabetes mellitus. We present the results of a multinational evaluation of the Cascade CGM (“C-CGM”) over 14 days of in-clinic and home use. Method: Each of the 57 enrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects wore 2 C-CGMs on the abdomen for 14 days. One part of the evaluation was the performance versus reference glucose values generated for 12 -hour in-clinic sessions on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14. Glucose blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes and analyzed with the Yellow Spring Instruments (YSI) 2300 glucose analyzer. The performance assessment on in-clinic days was based on paired YSI/CGM data points and on home-use days was based on paired fingerstick BGM (blood glucose monitoring)/CGM data points. Results: A total of 17 823 CGM/YSI data points during in-clinic use was analyzed. The mean absolute relative difference for glucose values between 100 and 400 mg/dL (MARD) and mean absolute difference for values between 40 and 100 mg/dL (MAD) were 11.5% and 15.1 mg/dL, respectively. The system accuracy during home use was 12.7% and 15 mg/dL for MARD and MAD, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or infectious complications reported. A modified algorithm “Hybrid Algorithm” was used in a prospective analysis of the in-clinic data, resulting in a MARD of 9.9% and MAD of 14.5 mg/dL. Conclusions: The performance of the C-CGM device over 14 days meets the safety and efficacy standards of CGM systems for managing blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. This was further confirmed when the C-CGM system was given approval for CE Mark in October 2019.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33084416</pmid><doi>10.1177/1932296820964574</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-4335</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-2968
ispartof Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022-03, Vol.16 (2), p.390-396
issn 1932-2968
1932-3107
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8861779
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Sage Journals Online
subjects Blood Glucose - analysis
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Humans
Original
Reproducibility of Results
title A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Clinical%20Performance%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20C-CGM%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20diabetes%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Rebec,%20Mihailo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=390-396&rft.issn=1932-2968&rft.eissn=1932-3107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1932296820964574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2452980909%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6a6894b60741e25040835e72adc20b98c882fd80046a04b56fb65872e9986a653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2452980909&rft_id=info:pmid/33084416&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1932296820964574&rfr_iscdi=true