Loading…

Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2022-06, Vol.103 (2), p.115683-115683, Article 115683
Main Authors: García-Fernández, Sergio, Pablo-Marcos, Daniel, de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco, Rodríguez, María José Reina, Gozalo, Mónica, Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús, Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel, Calvo, Jorge
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3
container_end_page 115683
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115683
container_title Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
container_volume 103
creator García-Fernández, Sergio
Pablo-Marcos, Daniel
de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco
Rodríguez, María José Reina
Gozalo, Mónica
Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús
Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel
Calvo, Jorge
description The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8931994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0732889322000517</els_id><sourcerecordid>2651690079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshixWaC7fmzu0AaZRKIVFGpKd1ajn1n6mhmPNiTqH0HHhqnKVXZsfLinnvO9fkQ-kTJnBJafNnNjVVtb7V3W-vmjDA2pzQvePoKzSgvRUJISV6jGSlTlnAu0jP0LoQdIZSJjLxFZ2meMVoWZIZ-Lw-q26vJugG7Bk93gL0arcFqmGwLAzYwgX4cTxAmvLmpftTVdY1XeHF1u64TKnDV4tW6wo3z-HjY4IIdWryprjfJwt0m7ALD_QjewqABN9710Rwve_DRXz_gGkblpx6G6T1606guwIen9xz9XC1vFt-Ty6tv60V1meiMllNiskZzorgWJeFCQPxIwYstYwUnTINRTZkpnROqBUtzIwrITUpz2lBOeSaa9Bx9PfmO-20PRsdorzo5etsr_yCdsvLfyWDvZOsOMlZJhciiwecnA-9-7WMvsrdBQ9epAdw-SFbktBCRgojSi5M00grBQ_McQ4k84pQ7-RKnPOKUJ5xx-ePLQ59X__KLgvokgFjXwYKXQT_2bKyP2KRx9n9y_gCFu7co</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2651690079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>García-Fernández, Sergio ; Pablo-Marcos, Daniel ; de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco ; Rodríguez, María José Reina ; Gozalo, Mónica ; Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús ; Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel ; Calvo, Jorge</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Fernández, Sergio ; Pablo-Marcos, Daniel ; de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco ; Rodríguez, María José Reina ; Gozalo, Mónica ; Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús ; Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel ; Calvo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35421760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens, Viral - analysis ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 Serological Testing ; Emergency Department ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Rapid antigen test ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2022-06, Vol.103 (2), p.115683-115683, Article 115683</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3282-2132 ; 0000-0003-2898-6599 ; 0000-0003-3760-6981 ; 0000-0002-5509-349X ; 0000-0002-3908-7057 ; 0000-0002-3802-3457</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Fernández, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pablo-Marcos, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María José Reina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozalo, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department</title><title>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department.</description><subject>Antigens, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing</subject><subject>Emergency Department</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Rapid antigen test</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCshixWaC7fmzu0AaZRKIVFGpKd1ajn1n6mhmPNiTqH0HHhqnKVXZsfLinnvO9fkQ-kTJnBJafNnNjVVtb7V3W-vmjDA2pzQvePoKzSgvRUJISV6jGSlTlnAu0jP0LoQdIZSJjLxFZ2meMVoWZIZ-Lw-q26vJugG7Bk93gL0arcFqmGwLAzYwgX4cTxAmvLmpftTVdY1XeHF1u64TKnDV4tW6wo3z-HjY4IIdWryprjfJwt0m7ALD_QjewqABN9710Rwve_DRXz_gGkblpx6G6T1606guwIen9xz9XC1vFt-Ty6tv60V1meiMllNiskZzorgWJeFCQPxIwYstYwUnTINRTZkpnROqBUtzIwrITUpz2lBOeSaa9Bx9PfmO-20PRsdorzo5etsr_yCdsvLfyWDvZOsOMlZJhciiwecnA-9-7WMvsrdBQ9epAdw-SFbktBCRgojSi5M00grBQ_McQ4k84pQ7-RKnPOKUJ5xx-ePLQ59X__KLgvokgFjXwYKXQT_2bKyP2KRx9n9y_gCFu7co</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>García-Fernández, Sergio</creator><creator>Pablo-Marcos, Daniel</creator><creator>de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco</creator><creator>Rodríguez, María José Reina</creator><creator>Gozalo, Mónica</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús</creator><creator>Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel</creator><creator>Calvo, Jorge</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-6599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-6981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-349X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-7057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3802-3457</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department</title><author>García-Fernández, Sergio ; Pablo-Marcos, Daniel ; de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco ; Rodríguez, María José Reina ; Gozalo, Mónica ; Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús ; Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel ; Calvo, Jorge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing</topic><topic>Emergency Department</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Rapid antigen test</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Fernández, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pablo-Marcos, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María José Reina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozalo, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Fernández, Sergio</au><au>Pablo-Marcos, Daniel</au><au>de la Fuente, Silvia Velasco</au><au>Rodríguez, María José Reina</au><au>Gozalo, Mónica</au><au>Rodríguez-Lozano, Jesús</au><au>Méndez-Legaza, José Manuel</au><au>Calvo, Jorge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115683</spage><epage>115683</epage><pages>115683-115683</pages><artnum>115683</artnum><issn>0732-8893</issn><eissn>1879-0070</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, in patients attended at the Emergency Department with signs or symptoms compatible with COVID-19 that had started in the last 5 days. The clinical performance of the antigen test was compared with RT-PCR, the reference standard. We included 663 specimens from non-repetitive patients. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were 84.0% (95% CI 76.1−89.7) and 99.6% (95% CI 98.5−99.9), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 98.1% (95% CI 92.7−99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI 94.4−97.7), respectively. The kappa index agreement between RT-PCR and the RADT was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84−0.93). We concluded that STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA is an excellent first-line RADT method to diagnose symptomatic patients in the emergency department.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35421760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-6599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-6981</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-349X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-7057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3802-3457</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-8893
ispartof Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2022-06, Vol.103 (2), p.115683-115683, Article 115683
issn 0732-8893
1879-0070
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8931994
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Antigens, Viral - analysis
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 Serological Testing
Emergency Department
Emergency Service, Hospital
Humans
Rapid antigen test
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A18%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20rapid%20antigen%20detection%20test%20STANDARD%20F%20COVID-19%20Ag%20FIA%20for%20diagnosing%20SARS-CoV-2:%20experience%20from%20an%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Fern%C3%A1ndez,%20Sergio&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115683&rft.epage=115683&rft.pages=115683-115683&rft.artnum=115683&rft.issn=0732-8893&rft.eissn=1879-0070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2651690079%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d4fc80a8c970899e760686b226802cedaf74ac501c9235d96e5d3151f181849f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2651690079&rft_id=info:pmid/35421760&rfr_iscdi=true