Loading…

If Artificial In Vitro Microenvironment Can Influence Tumor Drug Resistance Network via Modulation of lncRNA Expression?—Comparative Analysis of Glioblastoma-Derived Cell Culture Models and Initial Tumors In Vivo

The tumor resistance of glioblastoma cells in vivo is thought to be enhanced by their heterogeneity and plasticity, which are extremely difficult to curb in vitro. The external microenvironment shapes the molecular profile of tumor culture models, thus influencing potential therapy response. Our stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cellular and molecular neurobiology 2022-05, Vol.42 (4), p.1005-1020
Main Authors: Witusik-Perkowska, Monika, Jaskólski, Dariusz J., Liberski, Paweł P., Szemraj, Janusz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The tumor resistance of glioblastoma cells in vivo is thought to be enhanced by their heterogeneity and plasticity, which are extremely difficult to curb in vitro. The external microenvironment shapes the molecular profile of tumor culture models, thus influencing potential therapy response. Our study examines the expression profile of selected lncRNAs involved in tumor resistance network in three different glioblastoma-derived models commonly utilized for testing drug response in vitro. Differential expression analysis revealed significant divergence in lncRNA profile between parental tumors and tumor-derived cell cultures in vitro, including the following particles: MALAT1, CASC2, H19, TUSC7, XIST, RP11-838N2.4, DLX6-AS1, GLIDR, MIR210HG, SOX2-OT. The examined lncRNAs influence the phenomenon of tumor resistance via their downstream target genes through a variety of processes: multi-drug resistance, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, autophagy, cell proliferation and viability, and DNA repair. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro expression identified differences in the levels of potential lncRNA targets, with the highest discrepancies detected for the MDR1 , LRP1 , BCRP and MRP1 genes. Co-expression analyses confirmed the following interrelations: MALAT1–TYMS, MALAT1–MRP5, H19–ZEB1, CASC2–VIM, CASC2–N-CAD; they additionally suggest the possibility of MALAT1–BCRP, MALAT1–mTOR and TUSC7–PTEN interconnections in glioblastoma. Although our results clearly demonstrate that the artificial ex vivo microenvironment changes the profile of lncRNAs related to tumor resistance, it is difficult to anticipate the final phenotypic effect, since this phenomenon is a complex one that involves a network of molecular interactions underlying a variety of cellular processes.
ISSN:0272-4340
1573-6830
DOI:10.1007/s10571-020-00991-3