Loading…
Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study
Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to pre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nutrients 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1136 |
container_title | Nutrients |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Goni, Leticia Gil, Mario de la O, Víctor Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel Eisenberg, David M Pueyo-Garrigues, María Vasilj, Maria Gayoso, Lucía Etxeberria, Usune Ruiz-Canela, Miguel |
description | Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/nu14061136 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8950242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644013409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVlLxDAUhYMoKuqLP0ACvogwmq1p44MwjCuIC26PIW1uNdomY9oq8-9tcfe-3Av343AOB6F1SnY4V2TXd1QQSSmXc2iZkZSNpBR8_te9hNaa5okMk5JU8kW0xBPORar4Mro_gFeowrQG32LjLb4zlbOmdcHjUGKDz-ENn4Qa8CSEZ-cf8FGElw58McNXHTQD6I2LsIfH-NJVocXXbWdnq2ihNFUDa597Bd0eHd5MTkZnF8enk_HZqOhdtyOQuaEkVdYkIlEJpYKSwkqWlEAEyfNMMg55meUElIUsA5pblXMDmS2tZYavoP0P3WmX12CLPkY0lZ5GV5s408E4_ffj3aN-CK86UwlhgvUCW58CMbwMgXTtmgKqyngIXaOZFIJQLojq0c1_6FPoou_jDRQTicgU76ntD6qIoWkilN9mKNFDZfqnsh7e-G3_G_0qiL8D-q6Rkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642454893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu14061136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35334793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Clarity ; Cooking ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Criteria ; Diet ; Dietitians ; Food ; Gold ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Intervention ; Pilot Projects ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3917-9808 ; 0000-0002-8791-2832 ; 0000-0001-5238-0082 ; 0000-0002-7684-2787 ; 0000-0001-5800-8804 ; 0000-0002-5479-2045 ; 0000-0002-9916-275X ; 0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642454893/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642454893?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,38493,43871,44566,53766,53768,74155,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la O, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilj, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxeberria, Usune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><title>Nutrients</title><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><description>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clarity</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVlLxDAUhYMoKuqLP0ACvogwmq1p44MwjCuIC26PIW1uNdomY9oq8-9tcfe-3Av343AOB6F1SnY4V2TXd1QQSSmXc2iZkZSNpBR8_te9hNaa5okMk5JU8kW0xBPORar4Mro_gFeowrQG32LjLb4zlbOmdcHjUGKDz-ENn4Qa8CSEZ-cf8FGElw58McNXHTQD6I2LsIfH-NJVocXXbWdnq2ihNFUDa597Bd0eHd5MTkZnF8enk_HZqOhdtyOQuaEkVdYkIlEJpYKSwkqWlEAEyfNMMg55meUElIUsA5pblXMDmS2tZYavoP0P3WmX12CLPkY0lZ5GV5s408E4_ffj3aN-CK86UwlhgvUCW58CMbwMgXTtmgKqyngIXaOZFIJQLojq0c1_6FPoou_jDRQTicgU76ntD6qIoWkilN9mKNFDZfqnsh7e-G3_G_0qiL8D-q6Rkw</recordid><startdate>20220308</startdate><enddate>20220308</enddate><creator>Goni, Leticia</creator><creator>Gil, Mario</creator><creator>de la O, Víctor</creator><creator>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Eisenberg, David M</creator><creator>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creator><creator>Vasilj, Maria</creator><creator>Gayoso, Lucía</creator><creator>Etxeberria, Usune</creator><creator>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-275X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220308</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><author>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clarity</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la O, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilj, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxeberria, Usune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goni, Leticia</au><au>Gil, Mario</au><au>de la O, Víctor</au><au>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Eisenberg, David M</au><au>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</au><au>Vasilj, Maria</au><au>Gayoso, Lucía</au><au>Etxeberria, Usune</au><au>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><date>2022-03-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1136</spage><pages>1136-</pages><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35334793</pmid><doi>10.3390/nu14061136</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-275X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6643 |
ispartof | Nutrients, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136 |
issn | 2072-6643 2072-6643 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8950242 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Chronic illnesses Clarity Cooking Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Criteria Diet Dietitians Food Gold Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Intervention Pilot Projects Questionnaires Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validity |
title | Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20New%20Home%20Cooking%20Frequency%20Questionnaire:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Goni,%20Leticia&rft.date=2022-03-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1136&rft.pages=1136-&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu14061136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2644013409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642454893&rft_id=info:pmid/35334793&rfr_iscdi=true |