Loading…

Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrients 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136
Main Authors: Goni, Leticia, Gil, Mario, de la O, Víctor, Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel, Eisenberg, David M, Pueyo-Garrigues, María, Vasilj, Maria, Gayoso, Lucía, Etxeberria, Usune, Ruiz-Canela, Miguel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1136
container_title Nutrients
container_volume 14
creator Goni, Leticia
Gil, Mario
de la O, Víctor
Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel
Eisenberg, David M
Pueyo-Garrigues, María
Vasilj, Maria
Gayoso, Lucía
Etxeberria, Usune
Ruiz-Canela, Miguel
description Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values > 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/nu14061136
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8950242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644013409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVlLxDAUhYMoKuqLP0ACvogwmq1p44MwjCuIC26PIW1uNdomY9oq8-9tcfe-3Av343AOB6F1SnY4V2TXd1QQSSmXc2iZkZSNpBR8_te9hNaa5okMk5JU8kW0xBPORar4Mro_gFeowrQG32LjLb4zlbOmdcHjUGKDz-ENn4Qa8CSEZ-cf8FGElw58McNXHTQD6I2LsIfH-NJVocXXbWdnq2ihNFUDa597Bd0eHd5MTkZnF8enk_HZqOhdtyOQuaEkVdYkIlEJpYKSwkqWlEAEyfNMMg55meUElIUsA5pblXMDmS2tZYavoP0P3WmX12CLPkY0lZ5GV5s408E4_ffj3aN-CK86UwlhgvUCW58CMbwMgXTtmgKqyngIXaOZFIJQLojq0c1_6FPoou_jDRQTicgU76ntD6qIoWkilN9mKNFDZfqnsh7e-G3_G_0qiL8D-q6Rkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642454893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values &gt; 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu14061136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35334793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Clarity ; Cooking ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Criteria ; Diet ; Dietitians ; Food ; Gold ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Intervention ; Pilot Projects ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3917-9808 ; 0000-0002-8791-2832 ; 0000-0001-5238-0082 ; 0000-0002-7684-2787 ; 0000-0001-5800-8804 ; 0000-0002-5479-2045 ; 0000-0002-9916-275X ; 0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642454893/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2642454893?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,38493,43871,44566,53766,53768,74155,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la O, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilj, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxeberria, Usune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><title>Nutrients</title><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><description>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values &gt; 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clarity</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVlLxDAUhYMoKuqLP0ACvogwmq1p44MwjCuIC26PIW1uNdomY9oq8-9tcfe-3Av343AOB6F1SnY4V2TXd1QQSSmXc2iZkZSNpBR8_te9hNaa5okMk5JU8kW0xBPORar4Mro_gFeowrQG32LjLb4zlbOmdcHjUGKDz-ENn4Qa8CSEZ-cf8FGElw58McNXHTQD6I2LsIfH-NJVocXXbWdnq2ihNFUDa597Bd0eHd5MTkZnF8enk_HZqOhdtyOQuaEkVdYkIlEJpYKSwkqWlEAEyfNMMg55meUElIUsA5pblXMDmS2tZYavoP0P3WmX12CLPkY0lZ5GV5s408E4_ffj3aN-CK86UwlhgvUCW58CMbwMgXTtmgKqyngIXaOZFIJQLojq0c1_6FPoou_jDRQTicgU76ntD6qIoWkilN9mKNFDZfqnsh7e-G3_G_0qiL8D-q6Rkw</recordid><startdate>20220308</startdate><enddate>20220308</enddate><creator>Goni, Leticia</creator><creator>Gil, Mario</creator><creator>de la O, Víctor</creator><creator>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Eisenberg, David M</creator><creator>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creator><creator>Vasilj, Maria</creator><creator>Gayoso, Lucía</creator><creator>Etxeberria, Usune</creator><creator>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-275X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220308</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</title><author>Goni, Leticia ; Gil, Mario ; de la O, Víctor ; Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel ; Eisenberg, David M ; Pueyo-Garrigues, María ; Vasilj, Maria ; Gayoso, Lucía ; Etxeberria, Usune ; Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clarity</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goni, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la O, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilj, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxeberria, Usune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goni, Leticia</au><au>Gil, Mario</au><au>de la O, Víctor</au><au>Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Eisenberg, David M</au><au>Pueyo-Garrigues, María</au><au>Vasilj, Maria</au><au>Gayoso, Lucía</au><au>Etxeberria, Usune</au><au>Ruiz-Canela, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><date>2022-03-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1136</spage><pages>1136-</pages><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>Home cooking and the type of cooking techniques can have an effect on our health. However, as far as we know, there is no questionnaire that measures in depth the frequency and type of cooking techniques used at home. Our aim was to design a new Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire (HCFQ) and to preliminarily assess its psychometric properties. For this purpose we used a five-phase approach, as follows: Phase 1: item generation based on expert opinion, relevant literature and previous surveys; Phase 2: content validity assessed by experts for relevance and clarity (epidemiologists, dietitians, chefs); Phase 3: face validity and inter-item reliability; Phase 4: criterion validity using a 7-day food and culinary record; and Phase 5: test stability and inter-item reliability. The content validity index for scale and item level values provided evidence of the content validity for relevance and clarity. Criterion validity analysis showed intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31−0.69. Test−retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.49−0.92, with ƙ values &gt; 0.44. Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. In conclusion, the HCFQ is a promising tool with sound content and face validity, substantial criterion validity, and adequate reliability. This 174-item HCFQ is the first questionnaire to assess how often people cook and which cooking methods they use at home.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35334793</pmid><doi>10.3390/nu14061136</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-9808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-8804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-2045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-275X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-0015</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6643
ispartof Nutrients, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.1136
issn 2072-6643
2072-6643
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8950242
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Chronic illnesses
Clarity
Cooking
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Criteria
Diet
Dietitians
Food
Gold
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Intervention
Pilot Projects
Questionnaires
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validity
title Development and Validation of a New Home Cooking Frequency Questionnaire: A Pilot Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20New%20Home%20Cooking%20Frequency%20Questionnaire:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Goni,%20Leticia&rft.date=2022-03-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1136&rft.pages=1136-&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu14061136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2644013409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e6ba1079da5459511410cd625fe040bb8623ebf8b0e9de88e1bd9b3ae8dfdd2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642454893&rft_id=info:pmid/35334793&rfr_iscdi=true