Bedside Selection of Positive End Expiratory Pressure by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Patients Undergoing Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Comparison between COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS from Other Etiologies

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine 2022-03, Vol.11 (6), p.1639
• Main Authors: Di Pierro, Michela, Giani, Marco, Bronco, Alfio, Lembo, Francesca Maria, Rona, Roberto, Bellani, Giacomo, Foti, Giuseppe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Intensive care; Patients; Pulmonary arteries; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Software; Statistical analysis; Tomography; Ventilators
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061639

The interest in protective ventilation strategies and individualized approaches for patients with severe illness on veno venous extracorporeal support has increased in recent years. Wide heterogeneity exists among patients with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) and ARDS from other etiologies (NC-ARDS). EIT is a useful tool for the accurate analysis of regional lung volume distribution and allows for a tailored ventilatory setting. The aim of this work is to retrospectively describe the results of EIT assessments performed in patients C-ARDS and NC-ARDS undergoing V-V ECMO support. A clinical EIT-guided decremental PEEP trail was conducted for all patients included in the study and mechanically ventilated. 12 patients with C-ARDS and 12 patients with NC-ARDS were included in the study for a total of 13 and 18 EIT evaluations, respectively. No significant differences in arterial blood gas, respiratory parameters, and regional ventilation before and after the EIT exam were recorded. The subset of patients with NC-ARDS whose EIT exam led to PEEP modification was characterized by a lower baseline compliance compared with the C-ARDS group: 18 (16-28) vs. 27 (24-30) ( = 0.04). Overdistension significantly increased at higher steps only for the NC-ARDS group. A higher percentage of overdistension was described in patients with NC-ARDS when compared with patients with C-ARDS. EIT is feasible in patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS on veno-venous extracorporeal support and may help in tailoring the PEEP setting. Overall, severe COVID-19-related ARDS presents respiratory characteristics similar to severe "classical" NC-ARDS. However, C-ARDS is associated with a lower risk of overdistension at a higher PEEP level compared with NC-ARDS.