Loading…

State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice

Decreased responsiveness to sensory stimuli during sleep is presumably mediated via thalamic gating. Without an obligatory thalamic relay in the olfactory system, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) is suggested to be a gate in anesthetized states. However, olfactory processing in natural sleep state...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cell reports (Cambridge) 2022-03, Vol.38 (9), p.110450-110450, Article 110450
Main Authors: Schreck, Mary R., Zhuang, Liujing, Janke, Emma, Moberly, Andrew H., Bhattarai, Janardhan P., Gottfried, Jay A., Wesson, Daniel W., Ma, Minghong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3
container_end_page 110450
container_issue 9
container_start_page 110450
container_title Cell reports (Cambridge)
container_volume 38
creator Schreck, Mary R.
Zhuang, Liujing
Janke, Emma
Moberly, Andrew H.
Bhattarai, Janardhan P.
Gottfried, Jay A.
Wesson, Daniel W.
Ma, Minghong
description Decreased responsiveness to sensory stimuli during sleep is presumably mediated via thalamic gating. Without an obligatory thalamic relay in the olfactory system, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) is suggested to be a gate in anesthetized states. However, olfactory processing in natural sleep states remains undetermined. Here, we simultaneously record local field potentials (LFPs) in hierarchical olfactory regions (olfactory bulb [OB], APC, and orbitofrontal cortex) while optogenetically activating olfactory sensory neurons, ensuring consistent peripheral inputs across states in behaving mice. Surprisingly, evoked LFPs in sleep states (both non-rapid eye movement [NREM] and rapid eye movement [REM]) are larger and contain greater gamma-band power and cross-region coherence (compared to wakefulness) throughout the olfactory pathway, suggesting the lack of a central gate. Single-unit recordings from the OB and APC reveal a higher percentage of responsive neurons during sleep with a higher incidence of suppressed firing. Additionally, nasal breathing is slower and shallower during sleep, suggesting a partial peripheral gating mechanism. [Display omitted] •OSN stimulations evoke larger olfactory LFPs in NREM and REM sleep than in wakefulness•Larger responses in sleep suggest the lack of a central gate in the olfactory pathway•More OB and APC units respond in NREM with a higher incidence of suppressed firing•Slower and shallower breathing could partially gate olfactory input in sleep Schreck et al. examine how the olfactory system responds to the same peripheral stimulus during natural sleep and wake in mice. Larger responses along the pathway during sleep suggest the lack of a central gate, but slower and shallower breathing may act as a partial peripheral gate to reduce olfactory input.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110450
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8958632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211124722001772</els_id><sourcerecordid>2635475805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRVKr_QCRHL6n7mTQgghS_oOBBPS-7k0m7Jc3G3bTQf29CterFvczO7LzvzD6EXDA6ZpRl18sxYB2wHXPK-ZgxKhU9IKecM5YyLvPDX_cTch7jkvYno4wV8picCMWFmlB1Sm5eO9NhWmKLTYlNl_i6MtD5sE3a4AFjdM08cU1SBcR6m1hcmM1QWjnAM3JUmTri-VcckfeH-7fpUzp7eXye3s1SkJno0gJMCVCBzarScJurXBRciTyboChkJWzOC8GBCwnWgpLKFIAgRTmkNrNiRG53vu3arrCEfs9gat0GtzJhq71x-u9L4xZ67jd6UqhJJnhvcPVlEPzHGmOnVy72BGvToF9HzTOhZD4Q6VvlrhWCjzFgtR_DqB7Y66XesdcDe71j38suf6-4F32T_vkD9qA2DoOO4LABLF1A6HTp3f8TPgG0upjP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635475805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Schreck, Mary R. ; Zhuang, Liujing ; Janke, Emma ; Moberly, Andrew H. ; Bhattarai, Janardhan P. ; Gottfried, Jay A. ; Wesson, Daniel W. ; Ma, Minghong</creator><creatorcontrib>Schreck, Mary R. ; Zhuang, Liujing ; Janke, Emma ; Moberly, Andrew H. ; Bhattarai, Janardhan P. ; Gottfried, Jay A. ; Wesson, Daniel W. ; Ma, Minghong</creatorcontrib><description>Decreased responsiveness to sensory stimuli during sleep is presumably mediated via thalamic gating. Without an obligatory thalamic relay in the olfactory system, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) is suggested to be a gate in anesthetized states. However, olfactory processing in natural sleep states remains undetermined. Here, we simultaneously record local field potentials (LFPs) in hierarchical olfactory regions (olfactory bulb [OB], APC, and orbitofrontal cortex) while optogenetically activating olfactory sensory neurons, ensuring consistent peripheral inputs across states in behaving mice. Surprisingly, evoked LFPs in sleep states (both non-rapid eye movement [NREM] and rapid eye movement [REM]) are larger and contain greater gamma-band power and cross-region coherence (compared to wakefulness) throughout the olfactory pathway, suggesting the lack of a central gate. Single-unit recordings from the OB and APC reveal a higher percentage of responsive neurons during sleep with a higher incidence of suppressed firing. Additionally, nasal breathing is slower and shallower during sleep, suggesting a partial peripheral gating mechanism. [Display omitted] •OSN stimulations evoke larger olfactory LFPs in NREM and REM sleep than in wakefulness•Larger responses in sleep suggest the lack of a central gate in the olfactory pathway•More OB and APC units respond in NREM with a higher incidence of suppressed firing•Slower and shallower breathing could partially gate olfactory input in sleep Schreck et al. examine how the olfactory system responds to the same peripheral stimulus during natural sleep and wake in mice. Larger responses along the pathway during sleep suggest the lack of a central gate, but slower and shallower breathing may act as a partial peripheral gate to reduce olfactory input.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-1247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35235805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; local field potential ; mediodorsal thalamus ; Mice ; olfactory bulb ; Olfactory Bulb - physiology ; Olfactory Cortex ; Olfactory Pathways - physiology ; optogenetics ; orbitofrontal cortex ; piriform cortex ; sensory gating ; single-unit recording ; sleep ; Smell - physiology ; Wakefulness - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cell reports (Cambridge), 2022-03, Vol.38 (9), p.110450-110450, Article 110450</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3192-3866 ; 0000-0002-5027-9623</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35235805$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schreck, Mary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Liujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janke, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moberly, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattarai, Janardhan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottfried, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesson, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Minghong</creatorcontrib><title>State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice</title><title>Cell reports (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Cell Rep</addtitle><description>Decreased responsiveness to sensory stimuli during sleep is presumably mediated via thalamic gating. Without an obligatory thalamic relay in the olfactory system, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) is suggested to be a gate in anesthetized states. However, olfactory processing in natural sleep states remains undetermined. Here, we simultaneously record local field potentials (LFPs) in hierarchical olfactory regions (olfactory bulb [OB], APC, and orbitofrontal cortex) while optogenetically activating olfactory sensory neurons, ensuring consistent peripheral inputs across states in behaving mice. Surprisingly, evoked LFPs in sleep states (both non-rapid eye movement [NREM] and rapid eye movement [REM]) are larger and contain greater gamma-band power and cross-region coherence (compared to wakefulness) throughout the olfactory pathway, suggesting the lack of a central gate. Single-unit recordings from the OB and APC reveal a higher percentage of responsive neurons during sleep with a higher incidence of suppressed firing. Additionally, nasal breathing is slower and shallower during sleep, suggesting a partial peripheral gating mechanism. [Display omitted] •OSN stimulations evoke larger olfactory LFPs in NREM and REM sleep than in wakefulness•Larger responses in sleep suggest the lack of a central gate in the olfactory pathway•More OB and APC units respond in NREM with a higher incidence of suppressed firing•Slower and shallower breathing could partially gate olfactory input in sleep Schreck et al. examine how the olfactory system responds to the same peripheral stimulus during natural sleep and wake in mice. Larger responses along the pathway during sleep suggest the lack of a central gate, but slower and shallower breathing may act as a partial peripheral gate to reduce olfactory input.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>local field potential</subject><subject>mediodorsal thalamus</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>olfactory bulb</subject><subject>Olfactory Bulb - physiology</subject><subject>Olfactory Cortex</subject><subject>Olfactory Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>optogenetics</subject><subject>orbitofrontal cortex</subject><subject>piriform cortex</subject><subject>sensory gating</subject><subject>single-unit recording</subject><subject>sleep</subject><subject>Smell - physiology</subject><subject>Wakefulness - physiology</subject><issn>2211-1247</issn><issn>2211-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRVKr_QCRHL6n7mTQgghS_oOBBPS-7k0m7Jc3G3bTQf29CterFvczO7LzvzD6EXDA6ZpRl18sxYB2wHXPK-ZgxKhU9IKecM5YyLvPDX_cTch7jkvYno4wV8picCMWFmlB1Sm5eO9NhWmKLTYlNl_i6MtD5sE3a4AFjdM08cU1SBcR6m1hcmM1QWjnAM3JUmTri-VcckfeH-7fpUzp7eXye3s1SkJno0gJMCVCBzarScJurXBRciTyboChkJWzOC8GBCwnWgpLKFIAgRTmkNrNiRG53vu3arrCEfs9gat0GtzJhq71x-u9L4xZ67jd6UqhJJnhvcPVlEPzHGmOnVy72BGvToF9HzTOhZD4Q6VvlrhWCjzFgtR_DqB7Y66XesdcDe71j38suf6-4F32T_vkD9qA2DoOO4LABLF1A6HTp3f8TPgG0upjP</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Schreck, Mary R.</creator><creator>Zhuang, Liujing</creator><creator>Janke, Emma</creator><creator>Moberly, Andrew H.</creator><creator>Bhattarai, Janardhan P.</creator><creator>Gottfried, Jay A.</creator><creator>Wesson, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Ma, Minghong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-3866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-9623</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice</title><author>Schreck, Mary R. ; Zhuang, Liujing ; Janke, Emma ; Moberly, Andrew H. ; Bhattarai, Janardhan P. ; Gottfried, Jay A. ; Wesson, Daniel W. ; Ma, Minghong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>local field potential</topic><topic>mediodorsal thalamus</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>olfactory bulb</topic><topic>Olfactory Bulb - physiology</topic><topic>Olfactory Cortex</topic><topic>Olfactory Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>optogenetics</topic><topic>orbitofrontal cortex</topic><topic>piriform cortex</topic><topic>sensory gating</topic><topic>single-unit recording</topic><topic>sleep</topic><topic>Smell - physiology</topic><topic>Wakefulness - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schreck, Mary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Liujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janke, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moberly, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattarai, Janardhan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottfried, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesson, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Minghong</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cell reports (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schreck, Mary R.</au><au>Zhuang, Liujing</au><au>Janke, Emma</au><au>Moberly, Andrew H.</au><au>Bhattarai, Janardhan P.</au><au>Gottfried, Jay A.</au><au>Wesson, Daniel W.</au><au>Ma, Minghong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice</atitle><jtitle>Cell reports (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Cell Rep</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>110450</spage><epage>110450</epage><pages>110450-110450</pages><artnum>110450</artnum><issn>2211-1247</issn><eissn>2211-1247</eissn><abstract>Decreased responsiveness to sensory stimuli during sleep is presumably mediated via thalamic gating. Without an obligatory thalamic relay in the olfactory system, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) is suggested to be a gate in anesthetized states. However, olfactory processing in natural sleep states remains undetermined. Here, we simultaneously record local field potentials (LFPs) in hierarchical olfactory regions (olfactory bulb [OB], APC, and orbitofrontal cortex) while optogenetically activating olfactory sensory neurons, ensuring consistent peripheral inputs across states in behaving mice. Surprisingly, evoked LFPs in sleep states (both non-rapid eye movement [NREM] and rapid eye movement [REM]) are larger and contain greater gamma-band power and cross-region coherence (compared to wakefulness) throughout the olfactory pathway, suggesting the lack of a central gate. Single-unit recordings from the OB and APC reveal a higher percentage of responsive neurons during sleep with a higher incidence of suppressed firing. Additionally, nasal breathing is slower and shallower during sleep, suggesting a partial peripheral gating mechanism. [Display omitted] •OSN stimulations evoke larger olfactory LFPs in NREM and REM sleep than in wakefulness•Larger responses in sleep suggest the lack of a central gate in the olfactory pathway•More OB and APC units respond in NREM with a higher incidence of suppressed firing•Slower and shallower breathing could partially gate olfactory input in sleep Schreck et al. examine how the olfactory system responds to the same peripheral stimulus during natural sleep and wake in mice. Larger responses along the pathway during sleep suggest the lack of a central gate, but slower and shallower breathing may act as a partial peripheral gate to reduce olfactory input.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35235805</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110450</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-3866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-9623</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-1247
ispartof Cell reports (Cambridge), 2022-03, Vol.38 (9), p.110450-110450, Article 110450
issn 2211-1247
2211-1247
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8958632
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Animals
local field potential
mediodorsal thalamus
Mice
olfactory bulb
Olfactory Bulb - physiology
Olfactory Cortex
Olfactory Pathways - physiology
optogenetics
orbitofrontal cortex
piriform cortex
sensory gating
single-unit recording
sleep
Smell - physiology
Wakefulness - physiology
title State-dependent olfactory processing in freely behaving mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State-dependent%20olfactory%20processing%20in%20freely%20behaving%20mice&rft.jtitle=Cell%20reports%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=Schreck,%20Mary%20R.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=110450&rft.epage=110450&rft.pages=110450-110450&rft.artnum=110450&rft.issn=2211-1247&rft.eissn=2211-1247&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2635475805%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-9cadccfcb6fda2b75739253768e394f3b72932c234cbbc545a9cec43dcbbcb6b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635475805&rft_id=info:pmid/35235805&rfr_iscdi=true