MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy

Abstract Motivation The analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioinformatics 2022-04, Vol.38 (8), p.2344-2347
Main Authors: Pandey, Palash, Arora, Sanjeevani, Rosen, Gail L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applications Note
Humans
Mutation
Neoplasms - genetics
Software
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6fa369675cbf3897247e37f7b48e8628d75ed48f9df2c7c060d9e5f8c4bd63213
container_end_page 2347
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2344
container_title Bioinformatics
container_volume 38
creator Pandey, Palash
Arora, Sanjeevani
Rosen, Gail L
description Abstract Motivation The analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each using different methodology and yielding significantly different results. Because of the non-trivial differences in tools’ refitting results, researchers may desire to survey and compare the available tools, in order to objectively evaluate the results for their specific research question, such as which mutational signatures are prevalent in different cancer types. Results Due to the need for effective comparison of refitting mutational signatures, we introduce a user-friendly software that can aggregate and visually present results from different refitting packages. Availability and implementation MetaMutationalSigs is implemented using R and python and is available for installation using Docker and available at: https://github.com/EESI/MetaMutationalSigs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9004636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2628675496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6fa369675cbf3897247e37f7b48e8628d75ed48f9df2c7c060d9e5f8c4bd63213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtLxDAQhYMo3v-C9NGXatKkSeODIOINdhG8PIc0TWqkTdYkFfbfG9l10TefZmDOfHOGA8AJgmcIcnzeWm-d8WGUyap43iapIEdbYB8RCssK1nw795iykjQQ74GDGN8hrBEhZBfs4RrVDFZ0HzzNdZLzKWWMd3J4tn28KJQfFzLY6F3hTTFupkW0vZNpCroI2tiUrOtzF6chxWKUnS60jMsjsGPkEPXxuh6C19ubl-v7cvZ493B9NSsVgTiV1EhMOWW1ag1uOKsI05gZ1pJGN7RqOlbrjjSGd6ZSTEEKO65r0yjSdhRXCB-CyxV3MbWj7pR2KchBLIIdZVgKL634O3H2TfT-U3AICcU0A07XgOA_Jh2TGG1Uehik036Kosousj_Cv6V0JVXBx5if35xBUHwHIv4GItaB5MWT3yY3az8JZAFaCfy0-C_0C_mGobE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628675496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Pandey, Palash ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Rosen, Gail L</creator><contributor>Marschall, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Palash ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Rosen, Gail L ; Marschall, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Motivation The analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each using different methodology and yielding significantly different results. Because of the non-trivial differences in tools’ refitting results, researchers may desire to survey and compare the available tools, in order to objectively evaluate the results for their specific research question, such as which mutational signatures are prevalent in different cancer types. Results Due to the need for effective comparison of refitting mutational signatures, we introduce a user-friendly software that can aggregate and visually present results from different refitting packages. Availability and implementation MetaMutationalSigs is implemented using R and python and is available for installation using Docker and available at: https://github.com/EESI/MetaMutationalSigs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-4803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1367-4811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35157026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Applications Note ; Humans ; Mutation ; Neoplasms - genetics ; Software</subject><ispartof>Bioinformatics, 2022-04, Vol.38 (8), p.2344-2347</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6fa369675cbf3897247e37f7b48e8628d75ed48f9df2c7c060d9e5f8c4bd63213</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1763-5750</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004636/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9004636/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Marschall, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Palash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Sanjeevani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Gail L</creatorcontrib><title>MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy</title><title>Bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Bioinformatics</addtitle><description>Abstract Motivation The analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each using different methodology and yielding significantly different results. Because of the non-trivial differences in tools’ refitting results, researchers may desire to survey and compare the available tools, in order to objectively evaluate the results for their specific research question, such as which mutational signatures are prevalent in different cancer types. Results Due to the need for effective comparison of refitting mutational signatures, we introduce a user-friendly software that can aggregate and visually present results from different refitting packages. Availability and implementation MetaMutationalSigs is implemented using R and python and is available for installation using Docker and available at: https://github.com/EESI/MetaMutationalSigs.</description><subject>Applications Note</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1367-4803</issn><issn>1460-2059</issn><issn>1367-4811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVtLxDAQhYMo3v-C9NGXatKkSeODIOINdhG8PIc0TWqkTdYkFfbfG9l10TefZmDOfHOGA8AJgmcIcnzeWm-d8WGUyap43iapIEdbYB8RCssK1nw795iykjQQ74GDGN8hrBEhZBfs4RrVDFZ0HzzNdZLzKWWMd3J4tn28KJQfFzLY6F3hTTFupkW0vZNpCroI2tiUrOtzF6chxWKUnS60jMsjsGPkEPXxuh6C19ubl-v7cvZ493B9NSsVgTiV1EhMOWW1ag1uOKsI05gZ1pJGN7RqOlbrjjSGd6ZSTEEKO65r0yjSdhRXCB-CyxV3MbWj7pR2KchBLIIdZVgKL634O3H2TfT-U3AICcU0A07XgOA_Jh2TGG1Uehik036Kosousj_Cv6V0JVXBx5if35xBUHwHIv4GItaB5MWT3yY3az8JZAFaCfy0-C_0C_mGobE</recordid><startdate>20220412</startdate><enddate>20220412</enddate><creator>Pandey, Palash</creator><creator>Arora, Sanjeevani</creator><creator>Rosen, Gail L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-5750</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220412</creationdate><title>MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy</title><author>Pandey, Palash ; Arora, Sanjeevani ; Rosen, Gail L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6fa369675cbf3897247e37f7b48e8628d75ed48f9df2c7c060d9e5f8c4bd63213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Applications Note</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Palash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Sanjeevani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Gail L</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandey, Palash</au><au>Arora, Sanjeevani</au><au>Rosen, Gail L</au><au>Marschall, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy</atitle><jtitle>Bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Bioinformatics</addtitle><date>2022-04-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2344</spage><epage>2347</epage><pages>2344-2347</pages><issn>1367-4803</issn><eissn>1460-2059</eissn><eissn>1367-4811</eissn><abstract>Abstract Motivation The analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each using different methodology and yielding significantly different results. Because of the non-trivial differences in tools’ refitting results, researchers may desire to survey and compare the available tools, in order to objectively evaluate the results for their specific research question, such as which mutational signatures are prevalent in different cancer types. Results Due to the need for effective comparison of refitting mutational signatures, we introduce a user-friendly software that can aggregate and visually present results from different refitting packages. Availability and implementation MetaMutationalSigs is implemented using R and python and is available for installation using Docker and available at: https://github.com/EESI/MetaMutationalSigs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35157026</pmid><doi>10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-5750</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-4803
ispartof Bioinformatics, 2022-04, Vol.38 (8), p.2344-2347
issn 1367-4803
1460-2059
1367-4811
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9004636
source PubMed (Medline); Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Applications Note
Humans
Mutation
Neoplasms - genetics
Software
title MetaMutationalSigs: comparison of mutational signature refitting results made easy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MetaMutationalSigs:%20comparison%20of%20mutational%20signature%20refitting%20results%20made%20easy&rft.jtitle=Bioinformatics&rft.au=Pandey,%20Palash&rft.date=2022-04-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2344&rft.epage=2347&rft.pages=2344-2347&rft.issn=1367-4803&rft.eissn=1460-2059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2628675496%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6fa369675cbf3897247e37f7b48e8628d75ed48f9df2c7c060d9e5f8c4bd63213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628675496&rft_id=info:pmid/35157026&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bioinformatics/btac091&rfr_iscdi=true