Social control and solidarity during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The direct and indirect effects of causal attribution of insufficient compliance through perceived anomie

• Published in: Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2022-09, Vol.32 (5), p.963-973
• Main Authors: Roblain, Antoine, Gale, Jessica, Abboud, Soha, Arnal, Camila, Bornand, Thierry, Hanioti, Mado, Klein, Olivier, Klein, Pit P. L. E., Lastrego, Simona, Licata, Laurent, Mora, Youri L., Nera, Kenzo, Van der Linden, Nicolas, Van Oost, Pascaline, Toma, Claudia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anomie; Attitudes; Attribution; causal attribution; Causality; Compliance; COVID-19; Crises; Health behavior; Indirect effects; pandemic; Pandemics; Perceptions; Prosocial behavior; Regulation; Social cohesion; Social control; Social impact; Social regulation; Social solidarity; solidarity
• ISSN: 1052-9284; 1099-1298
• DOI: 10.1002/casp.2600

The COVID‐19 pandemic is a crisis which called for two crucial modes of social regulation: social control and social solidarity. In the present pre‐registered study, we examine how the perceived non‐compliance with health measures relates to attitudes towards these modes of social regulation, as well as to the role played by the perception of disintegrated and disregulated society (anomie). Using data from an online cross‐sectional survey conducted in Belgium in April 2020 (N = 717), results show that the causal attribution of the crisis to insufficient compliance was differentially associated with support for social control and social solidarity behaviours. Specifically, greater attribution to insufficient compliance was associated with a perceived breakdown in the social fabric (disintegration), which explained stronger support for social control and fewer solidarity‐based actions. Perceived disregulation, conversely, was associated with less support for social control and more support for social solidarity. Therefore, the perception of the pandemic and associated perceived anomie tend to polarize citizens' attitudes towards these two modes of social regulation. In this way, prosocial behaviours might be inhibited by communications that attribute the pandemic's causes to incivility. Other implications of our findings for the social psychological literature on communities' reactions to the pandemic are discussed. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.