Loading…

Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature

This systematic review of the literature aimed to highlight which criteria are described in the literature to define when a patient, after rotator cuff repair (RCR), is ready for return-to-play (RTP), which includes return to unrestricted activities, return to work, leisure, and sport activities. An...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2022-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2244
Main Authors: Bravi, Marco, Fossati, Chiara, Giombini, Arrigo, Macaluso, Andrea, Lazzoli, José Kawazoe, Santacaterina, Fabio, Bressi, Federica, Vorini, Ferruccio, Campi, Stefano, Papalia, Rocco, Pigozzi, Fabio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2244
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 11
creator Bravi, Marco
Fossati, Chiara
Giombini, Arrigo
Macaluso, Andrea
Lazzoli, José Kawazoe
Santacaterina, Fabio
Bressi, Federica
Vorini, Ferruccio
Campi, Stefano
Papalia, Rocco
Pigozzi, Fabio
description This systematic review of the literature aimed to highlight which criteria are described in the literature to define when a patient, after rotator cuff repair (RCR), is ready for return-to-play (RTP), which includes return to unrestricted activities, return to work, leisure, and sport activities. An online systematic search on the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was performed with no data limit until December 2021. A total of 24 studies that reported at least one criterion after RCR were included. Nine criteria were identified and among these, the most reported criterion was the time from surgery, which was used by 78% of the studies; time from surgery was used as the only criterion by 54% of the studies, and in combination with other criteria, in 24% of the studies. Strength and ROM were the most reported criteria after time (25%). These results are in line with a previous systematic review that aimed to identify RTP criteria after surgical shoulder stabilization and with a recent scoping review that investigated RTP criteria among athletes after RCR and anterior shoulder stabilization. Compared to this latest scoping review, our study adds the methodological strength of being conducted according to the Prisma guidelines; furthermore, our study included both athletes and non-athletes to provide a comprehensive view of the criteria used after RCR; moreover, ten additional recent manuscripts were examined with respect to the scoping review.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm11082244
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9024603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652972777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LwzAchoMobkxP3iXgZSLVNEmb1IMwhl8wUObuIU2T2dEuM0kn--_NcMo0lwTy_B7e5AXgLEXXhBToZqHaNEUcY0oPQB8jxhJEODncO_fAqfcLFBfnFKfsGPRIRrM8zveBGLs6aFdLaKyDUx06t0yCTV4buYHD6ez1EkoTATi1QYaIjDtj4Fvn5tptbuEIvm180K0MtYrT61p_QmvgZOuU0aVPwJGRjdenu30AZg_3s_FTMnl5fB6PJomKMUKCTQyHpZJphivKi4qyslQozShimOAqrzQrs0znKsOIK2mKEpclZ5xIzgpOBuDuW7vqylZXSi-Dk41YubqVbiOsrMXfm2X9LuZ2LQqEaY5IFAx3Amc_Ou2DaGuvdNPIpbadFzjPKOaUoyKiF__QhY2_Fl-3pXDBMGMsUlfflHLWe6fNb5gUiW11Yq-6SJ_v5_9lf4oiXxqGk1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652972777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Bravi, Marco ; Fossati, Chiara ; Giombini, Arrigo ; Macaluso, Andrea ; Lazzoli, José Kawazoe ; Santacaterina, Fabio ; Bressi, Federica ; Vorini, Ferruccio ; Campi, Stefano ; Papalia, Rocco ; Pigozzi, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravi, Marco ; Fossati, Chiara ; Giombini, Arrigo ; Macaluso, Andrea ; Lazzoli, José Kawazoe ; Santacaterina, Fabio ; Bressi, Federica ; Vorini, Ferruccio ; Campi, Stefano ; Papalia, Rocco ; Pigozzi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>This systematic review of the literature aimed to highlight which criteria are described in the literature to define when a patient, after rotator cuff repair (RCR), is ready for return-to-play (RTP), which includes return to unrestricted activities, return to work, leisure, and sport activities. An online systematic search on the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was performed with no data limit until December 2021. A total of 24 studies that reported at least one criterion after RCR were included. Nine criteria were identified and among these, the most reported criterion was the time from surgery, which was used by 78% of the studies; time from surgery was used as the only criterion by 54% of the studies, and in combination with other criteria, in 24% of the studies. Strength and ROM were the most reported criteria after time (25%). These results are in line with a previous systematic review that aimed to identify RTP criteria after surgical shoulder stabilization and with a recent scoping review that investigated RTP criteria among athletes after RCR and anterior shoulder stabilization. Compared to this latest scoping review, our study adds the methodological strength of being conducted according to the Prisma guidelines; furthermore, our study included both athletes and non-athletes to provide a comprehensive view of the criteria used after RCR; moreover, ten additional recent manuscripts were examined with respect to the scoping review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35456339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Clinical medicine ; Review ; Rotator cuff ; Sports injuries ; Surgery ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2244</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5808-9405 ; 0000-0002-3396-4100 ; 0000-0002-2870-7185 ; 0000-0001-9029-6156 ; 0000-0002-6142-3096</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652972777/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652972777?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35456339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossati, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giombini, Arrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzoli, José Kawazoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santacaterina, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorini, Ferruccio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalia, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigozzi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>This systematic review of the literature aimed to highlight which criteria are described in the literature to define when a patient, after rotator cuff repair (RCR), is ready for return-to-play (RTP), which includes return to unrestricted activities, return to work, leisure, and sport activities. An online systematic search on the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was performed with no data limit until December 2021. A total of 24 studies that reported at least one criterion after RCR were included. Nine criteria were identified and among these, the most reported criterion was the time from surgery, which was used by 78% of the studies; time from surgery was used as the only criterion by 54% of the studies, and in combination with other criteria, in 24% of the studies. Strength and ROM were the most reported criteria after time (25%). These results are in line with a previous systematic review that aimed to identify RTP criteria after surgical shoulder stabilization and with a recent scoping review that investigated RTP criteria among athletes after RCR and anterior shoulder stabilization. Compared to this latest scoping review, our study adds the methodological strength of being conducted according to the Prisma guidelines; furthermore, our study included both athletes and non-athletes to provide a comprehensive view of the criteria used after RCR; moreover, ten additional recent manuscripts were examined with respect to the scoping review.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LwzAchoMobkxP3iXgZSLVNEmb1IMwhl8wUObuIU2T2dEuM0kn--_NcMo0lwTy_B7e5AXgLEXXhBToZqHaNEUcY0oPQB8jxhJEODncO_fAqfcLFBfnFKfsGPRIRrM8zveBGLs6aFdLaKyDUx06t0yCTV4buYHD6ez1EkoTATi1QYaIjDtj4Fvn5tptbuEIvm180K0MtYrT61p_QmvgZOuU0aVPwJGRjdenu30AZg_3s_FTMnl5fB6PJomKMUKCTQyHpZJphivKi4qyslQozShimOAqrzQrs0znKsOIK2mKEpclZ5xIzgpOBuDuW7vqylZXSi-Dk41YubqVbiOsrMXfm2X9LuZ2LQqEaY5IFAx3Amc_Ou2DaGuvdNPIpbadFzjPKOaUoyKiF__QhY2_Fl-3pXDBMGMsUlfflHLWe6fNb5gUiW11Yq-6SJ_v5_9lf4oiXxqGk1k</recordid><startdate>20220417</startdate><enddate>20220417</enddate><creator>Bravi, Marco</creator><creator>Fossati, Chiara</creator><creator>Giombini, Arrigo</creator><creator>Macaluso, Andrea</creator><creator>Lazzoli, José Kawazoe</creator><creator>Santacaterina, Fabio</creator><creator>Bressi, Federica</creator><creator>Vorini, Ferruccio</creator><creator>Campi, Stefano</creator><creator>Papalia, Rocco</creator><creator>Pigozzi, Fabio</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-9405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-4100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-7185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-6156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-3096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220417</creationdate><title>Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature</title><author>Bravi, Marco ; Fossati, Chiara ; Giombini, Arrigo ; Macaluso, Andrea ; Lazzoli, José Kawazoe ; Santacaterina, Fabio ; Bressi, Federica ; Vorini, Ferruccio ; Campi, Stefano ; Papalia, Rocco ; Pigozzi, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossati, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giombini, Arrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaluso, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzoli, José Kawazoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santacaterina, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorini, Ferruccio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalia, Rocco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pigozzi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravi, Marco</au><au>Fossati, Chiara</au><au>Giombini, Arrigo</au><au>Macaluso, Andrea</au><au>Lazzoli, José Kawazoe</au><au>Santacaterina, Fabio</au><au>Bressi, Federica</au><au>Vorini, Ferruccio</au><au>Campi, Stefano</au><au>Papalia, Rocco</au><au>Pigozzi, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-04-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2244</spage><pages>2244-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>This systematic review of the literature aimed to highlight which criteria are described in the literature to define when a patient, after rotator cuff repair (RCR), is ready for return-to-play (RTP), which includes return to unrestricted activities, return to work, leisure, and sport activities. An online systematic search on the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, was performed with no data limit until December 2021. A total of 24 studies that reported at least one criterion after RCR were included. Nine criteria were identified and among these, the most reported criterion was the time from surgery, which was used by 78% of the studies; time from surgery was used as the only criterion by 54% of the studies, and in combination with other criteria, in 24% of the studies. Strength and ROM were the most reported criteria after time (25%). These results are in line with a previous systematic review that aimed to identify RTP criteria after surgical shoulder stabilization and with a recent scoping review that investigated RTP criteria among athletes after RCR and anterior shoulder stabilization. Compared to this latest scoping review, our study adds the methodological strength of being conducted according to the Prisma guidelines; furthermore, our study included both athletes and non-athletes to provide a comprehensive view of the criteria used after RCR; moreover, ten additional recent manuscripts were examined with respect to the scoping review.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35456339</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11082244</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-9405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-4100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-7185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-6156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-3096</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2244
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9024603
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Athletes
Clinical medicine
Review
Rotator cuff
Sports injuries
Surgery
Systematic review
title Criteria for Return-to-Play (RTP) after Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criteria%20for%20Return-to-Play%20(RTP)%20after%20Rotator%20Cuff%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Bravi,%20Marco&rft.date=2022-04-17&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2244&rft.pages=2244-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11082244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2652972777%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2f0882aca152d489d47bbc015407232d6de7b55e6c5208caf9b2bb8783a87983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652972777&rft_id=info:pmid/35456339&rfr_iscdi=true