Loading…

The Function Improved of the Newly Designed Magnetic-End Ureteric Stenting Retrieval Device: A Clinical Prospective Randomized and Control Trial in a Multicenter Study

Objective. To demonstrate the advantage of our newly designed magnetic ureteric stenting retrieval device over traditional nonmagnetic ureteric stents and other retrieval devices without cystoscopy intervention on clinical application and cost-related outcomes. Patients and Methods. A total of 333 p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contrast media and molecular imaging 2022, Vol.2022 (1), p.4107491-4107491
Main Authors: Zeng, Shaohua, Liu, Bo, Hu, Hu, Shi, Jian, Qian, Ping, Zhang, Xiaoping, Peng, Kexue, Yang, Sixing, Huang, Zheng, Pan, Tiejun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. To demonstrate the advantage of our newly designed magnetic ureteric stenting retrieval device over traditional nonmagnetic ureteric stents and other retrieval devices without cystoscopy intervention on clinical application and cost-related outcomes. Patients and Methods. A total of 333 patients were recruited into two study groups: magnetic-end ureteral stent (Group A) and conventional ureteral stent (Group B). The effects were evaluated by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) scores, complications of the indwelling stent, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at stent removal, and cost-analysis outcomes between the magnetic ureteric stenting retrieval device and traditional double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) removed by cystoscopy. Results. The VAS of the pain score of patients undergoing magnetic stent removal with the retrieval device was 2 ± 0.97, whereas that of patients undergoing conventional ureteral stent removal with cystoscopy was 5.76 ± 1.53 (p
ISSN:1555-4309
1555-4317
DOI:10.1155/2022/4107491