Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Development of 5-Year Prediction Models Using the FRISBEE Study

• Published in: The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2022-05, Vol.107 (6), p.e2438-e2448
• Main Authors: Baleanu, Felicia, Moreau, Michel, Charles, Alexia, Iconaru, Laura, Karmali, Rafik, Surquin, Murielle, Benoit, Florence, Mugisha, Aude, Paesmans, Marianne, Rubinstein, Michel, Rozenberg, Serge, Bergmann, Pierre, Body, Jean-Jacques
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Belgium; Bone Density; Care and treatment; Comorbidity; Female; Femur Neck; Fractures; Hip Fractures; Humans; Mortality; Online Only; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology; Osteoporotic Fractures - etiology; Postmenopausal women; Postmenopause; Rheumatoid factor; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
• ISSN: 0021-972X; 1945-7197
• DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac092

Individualized fracture risk may help to select patients requiring a pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis. FRAX and the Garvan fracture risk calculators are the most used tools, although their external validation has shown significant differences in their risk prediction ability. Using data from the Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry study, a cohort of 3560 postmenopausal women aged 60 to 85 years, we aimed to construct original 5-year fracture risk prediction models using validated clinical risk factors (CRFs). Three models of competing risk analysis were developed to predict major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), all fractures, and central fractures (femoral neck, shoulder, clinical spine, pelvis, ribs, scapula, clavicle, sternum). Age, a history of fracture, and hip or spine BMD were predictors common to the 3 models. Excessive alcohol intake and the presence of comorbidities were specific additional CRFs for MOFs, a history of fall for all fractures, and rheumatoid arthritis for central fractures. Our models predicted the fracture probability at 5 years with an acceptable accuracy (Brier scores ≤ 0.1) and had a good discrimination power (area under the receiver operating curve of 0.73 for MOFs and 0.72 for central fractures) when internally validated by bootstrap. Three simple nomograms, integrating significant CRFs and the mortality risk, were constructed for different fracture sites. In conclusion, we derived 3 models predicting fractures with an acceptable accuracy, particularly for MOFs and central fractures. The models are based on a limited number of CRFs, and we constructed nomograms for use in clinical practice.