Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel

Abstract We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.e347-e349
Main Authors: Tande, Aaron J, Swift, Melanie D, Challener, Douglas W, Berbari, Elie F, Tommaso, Christopher P, Christopherson, Darrin R, Binnicker, Matthew J, Breeher, Laura E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Brief Report
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63
container_end_page e349
container_issue 1
container_start_page e347
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 75
creator Tande, Aaron J
Swift, Melanie D
Challener, Douglas W
Berbari, Elie F
Tommaso, Christopher P
Christopherson, Darrin R
Binnicker, Matthew J
Breeher, Laura E
description Abstract We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guide return to work decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cid/ciac235
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9129106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciac235</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2645471578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAURk1pSdI0q76AVmVCcavfsbUpGKdJBgIpmSRbIcvXExVbciR5yrxXH7AOMwSy6UJIFx3Ohe_Lss8EfyNYsu_GtvPRhjLxLjshghX5Ukjyfn5jUea8ZOVx9jHG3xgTUmJxlB0zwQTFkpxkfx-S7W3aId-hS9_3_k8-jaj2wTu9tWGK6MJG0BEQxUSiRX37uLrIiTxHlUt2Aw7dQ0wRVV2CgCozJUBr2EKAw3AHcbRBJx92aL1zbfADvPFTtFhXd-u89o85PUcr14FJ1jtUDd5t0DXoPj0ZPQt_QYjeOeg_ZR863Uc4O9yn2cPlz_v6Or-5vVrV1U1uGJEpb3DZUAodKYhkomWma1qsNaUSM1NqIZYdFB20mBPgXAPmc4ScM10C10WzZKfZj713nJoBWgMuBd2rMdhBh53y2qq3P84-qY3fKkmoJPhFsDgIgn-e5qDUYKOBvtcO_BQVXXLBCyKKcka_7lETfIwButc1BKuXntXcszr0PNNf9rSfxv-C_wCxw6kL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645471578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Tande, Aaron J ; Swift, Melanie D ; Challener, Douglas W ; Berbari, Elie F ; Tommaso, Christopher P ; Christopherson, Darrin R ; Binnicker, Matthew J ; Breeher, Laura E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tande, Aaron J ; Swift, Melanie D ; Challener, Douglas W ; Berbari, Elie F ; Tommaso, Christopher P ; Christopherson, Darrin R ; Binnicker, Matthew J ; Breeher, Laura E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guide return to work decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35352091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Brief Report</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.e347-e349</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5900-5573</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tande, Aaron J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challener, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbari, Elie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tommaso, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopherson, Darrin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnicker, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeher, Laura E</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guide return to work decisions.</description><subject>Brief Report</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAURk1pSdI0q76AVmVCcavfsbUpGKdJBgIpmSRbIcvXExVbciR5yrxXH7AOMwSy6UJIFx3Ohe_Lss8EfyNYsu_GtvPRhjLxLjshghX5Ukjyfn5jUea8ZOVx9jHG3xgTUmJxlB0zwQTFkpxkfx-S7W3aId-hS9_3_k8-jaj2wTu9tWGK6MJG0BEQxUSiRX37uLrIiTxHlUt2Aw7dQ0wRVV2CgCozJUBr2EKAw3AHcbRBJx92aL1zbfADvPFTtFhXd-u89o85PUcr14FJ1jtUDd5t0DXoPj0ZPQt_QYjeOeg_ZR863Uc4O9yn2cPlz_v6Or-5vVrV1U1uGJEpb3DZUAodKYhkomWma1qsNaUSM1NqIZYdFB20mBPgXAPmc4ScM10C10WzZKfZj713nJoBWgMuBd2rMdhBh53y2qq3P84-qY3fKkmoJPhFsDgIgn-e5qDUYKOBvtcO_BQVXXLBCyKKcka_7lETfIwButc1BKuXntXcszr0PNNf9rSfxv-C_wCxw6kL</recordid><startdate>20220824</startdate><enddate>20220824</enddate><creator>Tande, Aaron J</creator><creator>Swift, Melanie D</creator><creator>Challener, Douglas W</creator><creator>Berbari, Elie F</creator><creator>Tommaso, Christopher P</creator><creator>Christopherson, Darrin R</creator><creator>Binnicker, Matthew J</creator><creator>Breeher, Laura E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-5573</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220824</creationdate><title>Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel</title><author>Tande, Aaron J ; Swift, Melanie D ; Challener, Douglas W ; Berbari, Elie F ; Tommaso, Christopher P ; Christopherson, Darrin R ; Binnicker, Matthew J ; Breeher, Laura E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brief Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tande, Aaron J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challener, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbari, Elie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tommaso, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopherson, Darrin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binnicker, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeher, Laura E</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford University Press Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tande, Aaron J</au><au>Swift, Melanie D</au><au>Challener, Douglas W</au><au>Berbari, Elie F</au><au>Tommaso, Christopher P</au><au>Christopherson, Darrin R</au><au>Binnicker, Matthew J</au><au>Breeher, Laura E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2022-08-24</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e347</spage><epage>e349</epage><pages>e347-e349</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guide return to work decisions.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35352091</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciac235</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-5573</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.e347-e349
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9129106
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Brief Report
title Utility of Follow-up Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Tests After Acute Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Among Healthcare Personnel
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A07%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20Follow-up%20Coronavirus%20Disease%202019%20(COVID-19)%20Antigen%20Tests%20After%20Acute%20Severe%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Syndrome%20Coronavirus%202%20(SARS-CoV-2)%20Infection%20Among%20Healthcare%20Personnel&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Tande,%20Aaron%20J&rft.date=2022-08-24&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e347&rft.epage=e349&rft.pages=e347-e349&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciac235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2645471578%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b08b22ef171935d3cfbd0aa22903c8a556fe7fed041e44ae04235443a8e4a7b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645471578&rft_id=info:pmid/35352091&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciac235&rfr_iscdi=true