Loading…

Perspectives, benefits and challenges of a live OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study

Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students' practical skills under necessary infection control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2022-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e058845-e058845
Main Authors: Loda, Teresa, Erschens, Rebecca Sarah, Nevins, Andrew B, Zipfel, Stephan, Herrmann-Werner, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic mandated fundamental changes to student evaluations, including the administration of the observed structured clinical examination (OSCE). This study aims to conduct an in-person OSCE to verify students' practical skills under necessary infection control practices and the impact of face masks on student-patient interactions. Cross-sectional design. The OSCE at Medical School of Tuebingen takes place in October 2020. A total of 149 students (third year of study) completed the survey (RR=80.1%). It was their first OSCE. Primary outcome measure was how this type of OSCE was evaluated by participating students in regard to preparation, content and difficulty as well as in real life. Secondary outcome measures were how the implemented hygiene actions influenced the OSCE, including the interaction and communication between students and standardised patients (SPs). Items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1=completely to 6=not at all). Means, SDs, frequencies and percentages were calculated. 149 students, 32 SPs and 59 examiners participated. The students rated the OSCE with 2.37 (±0.52) for preparation and 2.07 (±0.32) for content. They perceived the interaction to be significantly disrupted by the use of face masks (3.03±1.54) (p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058845