Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Prognostic Scales: The Impact of Exercise Modality in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine 2022-05, Vol.11 (11), p.3122
• Main Authors: Herrero Huertas, Julia, García Clemente, Marta, Díaz Molina, Beatriz, Lambert Rodríguez, José Luis, Íscar Urrutia, Marta
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiac arrhythmia; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Clinical medicine; Dyspnea; Ejection fraction; Fitness equipment; Heart failure; Oxygen saturation; Patients; Spirometry
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113122

The cardiopulmonary exercise (CPET) test is an essential tool to determine the severity, prognosis, and need for invasive treatments in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but disregards the exercise modality. The present study aimed at analyzing the differences between treadmill and cycle-ergometer exercises. This was a prospective study, involving 65 patients with HfrEF who performed treadmill exercise followed by cycle-ergometer exercise 72 h later. We enrolled 65 patients, aged 58 ± 9 years, with an ejection fraction of 29 ± 9%. Peak VO2 was 20% greater (95% CI: 18−21%; p < 0.000) on the treadmill, and the ventilatory efficiency estimated by the VE/VCO2 slope (32 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 9; p < 0.05). The ventilatory response was greater on the treadmill: maximum ventilation (55 ± 16 vs. 46 ± 11 L/min; p < 0.000) and ventilatory reserve at the maximum effort (28 ± 17 vs. 41 ± 15%; p < 0.000). These values led to a change in the functional class of 23 (51%) patients and ventilatory class of 28 (47%) patients. Differences in the main parameters, including peak VO2 and VE/VCO2, impact prognostic scales and possible advanced treatments; therefore, the results should be interpreted in accordance with the exercise modality.