Loading…
Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications
The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requireme...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Artificial intelligence review 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753 |
container_end_page | 2109 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2057 |
container_title | The Artificial intelligence review |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Olorunnimbe, Kenniy Viktor, Herna |
description | The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9245389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A737757518</galeid><sourcerecordid>A737757518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtBCIXgo_wAJZYtNFU_yMkw1SVaBFqsQG1pbjHN-6N7GDnVS6Oz6CL-RLcJtSHgtkybbOmZlzRoPQS0pOKCHqTaZE1KwijFW0XHVFHqENlYpXqtQfow1hdVuxhtED9Czna0KIZII_RQdcqpYKIjeoewcw4QFMCj5ssQ94vgKc52h3eDRpB_OPb98Nzvs8w2hmb3Fe0g3scXR4SsaWChzjztjdDHkuEsfYhB6baRq8LfgY8nP0xJkhw4v79xB9-fD-89lFdfnp_OPZ6WVlJeVzpQwnVnCmaie5s11jjRGcuL4lVrlWMmDMQUtK06imE1KUv-xMrXporZL8EL1ddaelG6G3EOZkBj0lX4zsdTRe_90J_kpv441umZC8aYvA0b1Ail-XYkePPlsYBhMgLlmzupFCKM5Jgb7-B3odlxSKPc2UUpIxdYc6WVFbM4D2wcUy15bTw-htDOB8qZ8qXhhK0qYQ2EqwKeacwD1sT4m-zVyvmesSt77LXN9OefWn7wfKr5ALgK-AXFphC-n3sv-R_Qkusrjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777522730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><creator>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</creator><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><description>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35791405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Deep learning ; Experimentation ; Machine learning ; Portfolio management ; Quantitative analysis ; Reproducibility ; Risk management ; Securities markets ; Stock markets ; Stocks ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2777522730/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2777522730?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,21360,21373,27282,27901,27902,33588,33589,33883,33884,34112,36037,36038,43709,43868,44339,73964,74152,74638</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><title>The Artificial intelligence review</title><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><description>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock markets</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0269-2821</issn><issn>1573-7462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtBCIXgo_wAJZYtNFU_yMkw1SVaBFqsQG1pbjHN-6N7GDnVS6Oz6CL-RLcJtSHgtkybbOmZlzRoPQS0pOKCHqTaZE1KwijFW0XHVFHqENlYpXqtQfow1hdVuxhtED9Czna0KIZII_RQdcqpYKIjeoewcw4QFMCj5ssQ94vgKc52h3eDRpB_OPb98Nzvs8w2hmb3Fe0g3scXR4SsaWChzjztjdDHkuEsfYhB6baRq8LfgY8nP0xJkhw4v79xB9-fD-89lFdfnp_OPZ6WVlJeVzpQwnVnCmaie5s11jjRGcuL4lVrlWMmDMQUtK06imE1KUv-xMrXporZL8EL1ddaelG6G3EOZkBj0lX4zsdTRe_90J_kpv441umZC8aYvA0b1Ail-XYkePPlsYBhMgLlmzupFCKM5Jgb7-B3odlxSKPc2UUpIxdYc6WVFbM4D2wcUy15bTw-htDOB8qZ8qXhhK0qYQ2EqwKeacwD1sT4m-zVyvmesSt77LXN9OefWn7wfKr5ALgK-AXFphC-n3sv-R_Qkusrjk</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creator><creator>Viktor, Herna</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><author>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock markets</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Artificial intelligence review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</au><au>Viktor, Herna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</atitle><jtitle>The Artificial intelligence review</jtitle><stitle>Artif Intell Rev</stitle><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2057</spage><epage>2109</epage><pages>2057-2109</pages><issn>0269-2821</issn><eissn>1573-7462</eissn><abstract>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>35791405</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0</doi><tpages>53</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-2821 |
ispartof | The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109 |
issn | 0269-2821 1573-7462 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9245389 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; Library & Information Science Collection |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Computer Science Deep learning Experimentation Machine learning Portfolio management Quantitative analysis Reproducibility Risk management Securities markets Stock markets Stocks Strategy |
title | Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20in%20the%20stock%20market%E2%80%94a%20systematic%20survey%20of%20practice,%20backtesting,%20and%20applications&rft.jtitle=The%20Artificial%20intelligence%20review&rft.au=Olorunnimbe,%20Kenniy&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2057&rft.epage=2109&rft.pages=2057-2109&rft.issn=0269-2821&rft.eissn=1573-7462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA737757518%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777522730&rft_id=info:pmid/35791405&rft_galeid=A737757518&rfr_iscdi=true |