Loading…

Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications

The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requireme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Artificial intelligence review 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109
Main Authors: Olorunnimbe, Kenniy, Viktor, Herna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753
container_end_page 2109
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2057
container_title The Artificial intelligence review
container_volume 56
creator Olorunnimbe, Kenniy
Viktor, Herna
description The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9245389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A737757518</galeid><sourcerecordid>A737757518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtBCIXgo_wAJZYtNFU_yMkw1SVaBFqsQG1pbjHN-6N7GDnVS6Oz6CL-RLcJtSHgtkybbOmZlzRoPQS0pOKCHqTaZE1KwijFW0XHVFHqENlYpXqtQfow1hdVuxhtED9Czna0KIZII_RQdcqpYKIjeoewcw4QFMCj5ssQ94vgKc52h3eDRpB_OPb98Nzvs8w2hmb3Fe0g3scXR4SsaWChzjztjdDHkuEsfYhB6baRq8LfgY8nP0xJkhw4v79xB9-fD-89lFdfnp_OPZ6WVlJeVzpQwnVnCmaie5s11jjRGcuL4lVrlWMmDMQUtK06imE1KUv-xMrXporZL8EL1ddaelG6G3EOZkBj0lX4zsdTRe_90J_kpv441umZC8aYvA0b1Ail-XYkePPlsYBhMgLlmzupFCKM5Jgb7-B3odlxSKPc2UUpIxdYc6WVFbM4D2wcUy15bTw-htDOB8qZ8qXhhK0qYQ2EqwKeacwD1sT4m-zVyvmesSt77LXN9OefWn7wfKr5ALgK-AXFphC-n3sv-R_Qkusrjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777522730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><creator>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</creator><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><description>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35791405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Deep learning ; Experimentation ; Machine learning ; Portfolio management ; Quantitative analysis ; Reproducibility ; Risk management ; Securities markets ; Stock markets ; Stocks ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2777522730/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2777522730?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11667,21360,21373,27282,27901,27902,33588,33589,33883,33884,34112,36037,36038,43709,43868,44339,73964,74152,74638</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><title>The Artificial intelligence review</title><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><description>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock markets</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0269-2821</issn><issn>1573-7462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtBCIXgo_wAJZYtNFU_yMkw1SVaBFqsQG1pbjHN-6N7GDnVS6Oz6CL-RLcJtSHgtkybbOmZlzRoPQS0pOKCHqTaZE1KwijFW0XHVFHqENlYpXqtQfow1hdVuxhtED9Czna0KIZII_RQdcqpYKIjeoewcw4QFMCj5ssQ94vgKc52h3eDRpB_OPb98Nzvs8w2hmb3Fe0g3scXR4SsaWChzjztjdDHkuEsfYhB6baRq8LfgY8nP0xJkhw4v79xB9-fD-89lFdfnp_OPZ6WVlJeVzpQwnVnCmaie5s11jjRGcuL4lVrlWMmDMQUtK06imE1KUv-xMrXporZL8EL1ddaelG6G3EOZkBj0lX4zsdTRe_90J_kpv441umZC8aYvA0b1Ail-XYkePPlsYBhMgLlmzupFCKM5Jgb7-B3odlxSKPc2UUpIxdYc6WVFbM4D2wcUy15bTw-htDOB8qZ8qXhhK0qYQ2EqwKeacwD1sT4m-zVyvmesSt77LXN9OefWn7wfKr5ALgK-AXFphC-n3sv-R_Qkusrjk</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creator><creator>Viktor, Herna</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</title><author>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy ; Viktor, Herna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock markets</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, Herna</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Artificial intelligence review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olorunnimbe, Kenniy</au><au>Viktor, Herna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications</atitle><jtitle>The Artificial intelligence review</jtitle><stitle>Artif Intell Rev</stitle><addtitle>Artif Intell Rev</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2057</spage><epage>2109</epage><pages>2057-2109</pages><issn>0269-2821</issn><eissn>1573-7462</eissn><abstract>The widespread usage of machine learning in different mainstream contexts has made deep learning the technique of choice in various domains, including finance. This systematic survey explores various scenarios employing deep learning in financial markets, especially the stock market. A key requirement for our methodology is its focus on research papers involving backtesting. That is, we consider whether the experimentation mode is sufficient for market practitioners to consider the work in a real-world use case. Works meeting this requirement are distributed across seven distinct specializations. Most studies focus on trade strategy, price prediction, and portfolio management, with a limited number considering market simulation, stock selection, hedging strategy, and risk management. We also recognize that domain-specific metrics such as “returns” and “volatility” appear most important for accurately representing model performance across specializations. Our study demonstrates that, although there have been some improvements in reproducibility, substantial work remains to be done regarding model explainability. Accordingly, we suggest several future directions, such as improving trust by creating reproducible, explainable, and accountable models and emphasizing prediction of longer-term horizons—potentially via the utilization of supplementary data—which continues to represent a significant unresolved challenge.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>35791405</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0</doi><tpages>53</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1914-5077</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2821
ispartof The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2057-2109
issn 0269-2821
1573-7462
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9245389
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; Library & Information Science Collection
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science
Deep learning
Experimentation
Machine learning
Portfolio management
Quantitative analysis
Reproducibility
Risk management
Securities markets
Stock markets
Stocks
Strategy
title Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20in%20the%20stock%20market%E2%80%94a%20systematic%20survey%20of%20practice,%20backtesting,%20and%20applications&rft.jtitle=The%20Artificial%20intelligence%20review&rft.au=Olorunnimbe,%20Kenniy&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2057&rft.epage=2109&rft.pages=2057-2109&rft.issn=0269-2821&rft.eissn=1573-7462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA737757518%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-7a30c43276f53fcb8caa430fd90c7f952e22fe9053fa78b4549055ba67de9c753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777522730&rft_id=info:pmid/35791405&rft_galeid=A737757518&rfr_iscdi=true